将舌下免疫疗法配药登记处的命名患者产品与法国医疗保险数据库 (SNDS) 成功连接:EfficAPSI 队列的方法构成。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Expert Review of Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294040
Philippe Devillier, Mathieu Molimard, Jean-François Bergmann, Bertrand Delaisi, Amandine Gouverneur, Jade Vadel, Cédric Collin, Laurence Girard, Silvia Scurati, Pascal Demoly
{"title":"将舌下免疫疗法配药登记处的命名患者产品与法国医疗保险数据库 (SNDS) 成功连接:EfficAPSI 队列的方法构成。","authors":"Philippe Devillier, Mathieu Molimard, Jean-François Bergmann, Bertrand Delaisi, Amandine Gouverneur, Jade Vadel, Cédric Collin, Laurence Girard, Silvia Scurati, Pascal Demoly","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The only causal treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT) including personalized liquid sublingual AIT (SLIT). We present the methodology for establishing the EfficAPSI cohort to further evaluate the real-life effectiveness and use of SLIT liquid.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The EfficAPSI cohort was constituted by deterministic linkage of Stallergenes Greer dispensing and nationwide French healthcare insurance system (SNDS) databases. Data from 2006 to 2018 were extracted. All patients who initiated Stallergenes Greer SLIT liquid between 2010 and 2013 were considered as exposed and those dispensed with AR symptomatic treatment only as control. To limit the impact of confounding, the models will be weighted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 445,574 patients were included; median age was 38 years; 59.1% were female. Exposed patients (<i>n</i> = 112,492) were significantly younger, more frequently males, and less likely to have comorbidities than controls (<i>n</i> = 333,082). After IPTW, patients' characteristics from both groups were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To date, the EfficAPSI cohort has the largest number of person-years of follow-up in the field of AIT. The completeness of the data allows to evaluate SLIT liquid effectiveness with rigorous methodology, leading to important insights on personalized medicine in real-life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A successful linkage of a named patient products of sublingual immunotherapy-dispensing registry to French healthcare insurance database (SNDS): methodological constitution of the EfficAPSI cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Devillier, Mathieu Molimard, Jean-François Bergmann, Bertrand Delaisi, Amandine Gouverneur, Jade Vadel, Cédric Collin, Laurence Girard, Silvia Scurati, Pascal Demoly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The only causal treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT) including personalized liquid sublingual AIT (SLIT). We present the methodology for establishing the EfficAPSI cohort to further evaluate the real-life effectiveness and use of SLIT liquid.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The EfficAPSI cohort was constituted by deterministic linkage of Stallergenes Greer dispensing and nationwide French healthcare insurance system (SNDS) databases. Data from 2006 to 2018 were extracted. All patients who initiated Stallergenes Greer SLIT liquid between 2010 and 2013 were considered as exposed and those dispensed with AR symptomatic treatment only as control. To limit the impact of confounding, the models will be weighted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 445,574 patients were included; median age was 38 years; 59.1% were female. Exposed patients (<i>n</i> = 112,492) were significantly younger, more frequently males, and less likely to have comorbidities than controls (<i>n</i> = 333,082). After IPTW, patients' characteristics from both groups were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To date, the EfficAPSI cohort has the largest number of person-years of follow-up in the field of AIT. The completeness of the data allows to evaluate SLIT liquid effectiveness with rigorous methodology, leading to important insights on personalized medicine in real-life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2023.2294040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:过敏性鼻炎(AR)的唯一有效治疗方法是过敏原免疫疗法(AIT),包括个性化液体舌下AIT(SLIT)。我们介绍了建立 EfficAPSI 队列的方法,以进一步评估 SLIT 液体在现实生活中的有效性和使用情况:EfficAPSI队列由Stallergenes Greer配药数据库和法国全国医疗保险系统(SNDS)数据库的确定性链接构成。提取了 2006 年至 2018 年的数据。所有在 2010 年至 2013 年期间开始使用 Stallergenes Greer SLIT 液体的患者均被视为暴露者,而仅配发 AR 对症治疗药物的患者则被视为对照组。为限制混杂因素的影响,模型将采用逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)进行加权:共纳入 445,574 名患者;中位年龄为 38 岁;59.1% 为女性。与对照组(人数=333 082)相比,暴露患者(人数=112 492)明显更年轻,男性更多,患有合并症的可能性更小。IPTW后,两组患者的特征相似:迄今为止,EfficAPSI 队列在 AIT 领域拥有最多的随访年数。数据的完整性使我们能用严格的方法评估 SLIT 液体的有效性,从而对现实生活中的个性化医疗有重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A successful linkage of a named patient products of sublingual immunotherapy-dispensing registry to French healthcare insurance database (SNDS): methodological constitution of the EfficAPSI cohort.

Background: The only causal treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT) including personalized liquid sublingual AIT (SLIT). We present the methodology for establishing the EfficAPSI cohort to further evaluate the real-life effectiveness and use of SLIT liquid.

Research design and methods: The EfficAPSI cohort was constituted by deterministic linkage of Stallergenes Greer dispensing and nationwide French healthcare insurance system (SNDS) databases. Data from 2006 to 2018 were extracted. All patients who initiated Stallergenes Greer SLIT liquid between 2010 and 2013 were considered as exposed and those dispensed with AR symptomatic treatment only as control. To limit the impact of confounding, the models will be weighted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results: A total of 445,574 patients were included; median age was 38 years; 59.1% were female. Exposed patients (n = 112,492) were significantly younger, more frequently males, and less likely to have comorbidities than controls (n = 333,082). After IPTW, patients' characteristics from both groups were similar.

Conclusions: To date, the EfficAPSI cohort has the largest number of person-years of follow-up in the field of AIT. The completeness of the data allows to evaluate SLIT liquid effectiveness with rigorous methodology, leading to important insights on personalized medicine in real-life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Ten clinical conundrums in the management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Anakinra as first-line monotherapy for new-onset steroid-naïve sJIA patients. Pathogen-specific cell-mediated immunity to guide the management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation: state of the art clinical review. Aleukemic variant of T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - diagnostically challenging subtype. Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphoproliferation in inborn errors of immunity: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1