肩部手术椎间臂丛阻滞术后的反跳痛:不同多模式镇痛方案效果的随机临床试验。

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339
Tayfun Et, Betul Basaran, Aysegul Bilge, Rafet Yarımoğlu, Muhammet Korkusuz, İbrahim Tülüce
{"title":"肩部手术椎间臂丛阻滞术后的反跳痛:不同多模式镇痛方案效果的随机临床试验。","authors":"Tayfun Et, Betul Basaran, Aysegul Bilge, Rafet Yarımoğlu, Muhammet Korkusuz, İbrahim Tülüce","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rebound pain is characterized by sudden, significant acute postoperative pain occurring after the resolution of inter-scalene block (ISB); it affects the quality of recovery postoperatively. Dexamethasone increases ISB resolution time and decreases opioid consumption and the incidence of rebound pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate whether multimodal analgesia including intravenous dexamethasone administration with preoperative ISB reduces the incidence of rebound pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>60 patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to two different multimodal analgesia protocols. Thirty patients received 5 mg IV dexamethasone with non-steroid, paracetamol, and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while the control patients received the same regimen and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine without dexamethasone. Postoperative opioids were given to any patient on demand.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Effect of IV dexamethasone on pain score and incidence of rebound pain after ISB resolution and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-48 hours, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, sleep scale scores, and quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of rebound pain was lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (73.3% and 30%, respectively, <i>P</i>=.001). NPRS scores after ISB resolution were lower in the dexamethasone group (5 ([4-7]), 8 ([5.75-8]), <i>P</i><.001, respectively). Those who received IV dexamethasone had less sleep disturbances (<i>P</i><.001) and higher QoR-15 on day 1 (<i>P</i><.001) and day 7 (<i>P</i>=.020) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IV dexamethasone added to the ISB block resulted in a lower incidence of rebound pain. In addition, better results were obtained in postoperative sleep quality and QoR-15.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single-center study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rebound pain after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of different multimodal analgesia regimens.\",\"authors\":\"Tayfun Et, Betul Basaran, Aysegul Bilge, Rafet Yarımoğlu, Muhammet Korkusuz, İbrahim Tülüce\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rebound pain is characterized by sudden, significant acute postoperative pain occurring after the resolution of inter-scalene block (ISB); it affects the quality of recovery postoperatively. Dexamethasone increases ISB resolution time and decreases opioid consumption and the incidence of rebound pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate whether multimodal analgesia including intravenous dexamethasone administration with preoperative ISB reduces the incidence of rebound pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>60 patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to two different multimodal analgesia protocols. Thirty patients received 5 mg IV dexamethasone with non-steroid, paracetamol, and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while the control patients received the same regimen and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine without dexamethasone. Postoperative opioids were given to any patient on demand.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Effect of IV dexamethasone on pain score and incidence of rebound pain after ISB resolution and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-48 hours, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, sleep scale scores, and quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of rebound pain was lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (73.3% and 30%, respectively, <i>P</i>=.001). NPRS scores after ISB resolution were lower in the dexamethasone group (5 ([4-7]), 8 ([5.75-8]), <i>P</i><.001, respectively). Those who received IV dexamethasone had less sleep disturbances (<i>P</i><.001) and higher QoR-15 on day 1 (<i>P</i><.001) and day 7 (<i>P</i>=.020) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IV dexamethasone added to the ISB block resulted in a lower incidence of rebound pain. In addition, better results were obtained in postoperative sleep quality and QoR-15.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single-center study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反跳痛的特点是在肩胛间阻滞(ISB)缓解后突然发生的、明显的术后急性疼痛;它影响术后恢复的质量。地塞米松能延长ISB解除时间,减少阿片类药物的用量和反跳痛的发生率:评估包括术前 ISB 时静脉注射地塞米松在内的多模式镇痛是否能降低反跳痛的发生率:设计:前瞻性、随机对照试验:样本量:60 例患者:在全身麻醉下接受肩部手术的患者被随机分配到两种不同的多模式镇痛方案中。30名患者接受5毫克地塞米松静脉注射,同时使用非甾体类药物扑热息痛和15毫升0.5%布比卡因进行ISB,而对照组患者接受相同的方案,同时使用15毫升0.5%布比卡因进行ISB,不使用地塞米松。术后阿片类药物按需提供给任何患者:主要结果指标:静脉注射地塞米松对ISB缓解后疼痛评分和反跳痛发生率的影响、术后0-48小时阿片类药物用量、疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评分、睡眠评分量表评分和恢复质量-15评分(QoR-15):地塞米松组的反跳痛发生率低于对照组(分别为73.3%和30%,P=.001)。地塞米松组术后ISB缓解后的NPRS评分较低(5([4-7]),8([5.75-8]),PPPP=.020):结论:在 ISB 阻滞中加入静脉注射地塞米松可降低反跳痛的发生率。此外,术后睡眠质量和 QoR-15 也得到了改善:局限性:单中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rebound pain after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of different multimodal analgesia regimens.

Background: Rebound pain is characterized by sudden, significant acute postoperative pain occurring after the resolution of inter-scalene block (ISB); it affects the quality of recovery postoperatively. Dexamethasone increases ISB resolution time and decreases opioid consumption and the incidence of rebound pain.

Objective: Evaluate whether multimodal analgesia including intravenous dexamethasone administration with preoperative ISB reduces the incidence of rebound pain.

Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Tertiary university hospital.

Sample size: 60 patients.

Patients and methods: Patients who underwent shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to two different multimodal analgesia protocols. Thirty patients received 5 mg IV dexamethasone with non-steroid, paracetamol, and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while the control patients received the same regimen and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine without dexamethasone. Postoperative opioids were given to any patient on demand.

Main outcomes measures: Effect of IV dexamethasone on pain score and incidence of rebound pain after ISB resolution and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-48 hours, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, sleep scale scores, and quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15).

Results: The incidence of rebound pain was lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (73.3% and 30%, respectively, P=.001). NPRS scores after ISB resolution were lower in the dexamethasone group (5 ([4-7]), 8 ([5.75-8]), P<.001, respectively). Those who received IV dexamethasone had less sleep disturbances (P<.001) and higher QoR-15 on day 1 (P<.001) and day 7 (P=.020) postoperatively.

Conclusions: IV dexamethasone added to the ISB block resulted in a lower incidence of rebound pain. In addition, better results were obtained in postoperative sleep quality and QoR-15.

Limitations: Single-center study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of different patient positions on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing urological procedures: a prospective study. Estimating the prevalence of select non-communicable diseases in Saudi Arabia using a population-based sample: econometric analysis with natural language processing. Evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position: a prospective observational study. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination on cesarean section outcomes: a retrospective analysis. Predictors of medication regimen complexity and its impact on hemoglobin a1c in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective analysis in ambulatory care in Makkah City.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1