智利老年人罗兰德痴呆症通用评估量表(RUDAS)的正常化。

Q3 Medicine Dementia e Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2023-12-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0033
Consuelo Sepúlveda-Ibarra, Fernando Henríquez Chaparro, Anthony Marcotti, Guillermo Soto, Andrea Slachevsky
{"title":"智利老年人罗兰德痴呆症通用评估量表(RUDAS)的正常化。","authors":"Consuelo Sepúlveda-Ibarra, Fernando Henríquez Chaparro, Anthony Marcotti, Guillermo Soto, Andrea Slachevsky","doi":"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a cognitive screening that evaluates older people with low educational levels. In Chile, there are no normative data to assess this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain normative data on RUDAS in older Chilean people with up to 12 years of schooling, and to determine whether age and schooling years influence a person's performance on RUDAS and on the items that constitute it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of cognitively healthy people 60 years old or over, with up to 12 schooling years was evaluated (n=135). Multiple regression models were applied to obtain normative data on RUDAS, according to age and schooling years, and to measure the effects of schooling on different items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis showed that none of the items had schooling as a significant predictor, except for the visuoconstruction item. The variables age and schooling explained 12.6% (R^2=0.126) of the RUDAS total score variance. The item visuoconstruction was the most associated with the educational level (OR=1,147).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that RUDAS is a recommended instrument for evaluating older people with low educational levels. However, more studies are needed to prove the validity of the RUDAS on Chilean older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":39167,"journal":{"name":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normalization of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) in Chilean older people.\",\"authors\":\"Consuelo Sepúlveda-Ibarra, Fernando Henríquez Chaparro, Anthony Marcotti, Guillermo Soto, Andrea Slachevsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a cognitive screening that evaluates older people with low educational levels. In Chile, there are no normative data to assess this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain normative data on RUDAS in older Chilean people with up to 12 years of schooling, and to determine whether age and schooling years influence a person's performance on RUDAS and on the items that constitute it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of cognitively healthy people 60 years old or over, with up to 12 schooling years was evaluated (n=135). Multiple regression models were applied to obtain normative data on RUDAS, according to age and schooling years, and to measure the effects of schooling on different items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis showed that none of the items had schooling as a significant predictor, except for the visuoconstruction item. The variables age and schooling explained 12.6% (R^2=0.126) of the RUDAS total score variance. The item visuoconstruction was the most associated with the educational level (OR=1,147).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that RUDAS is a recommended instrument for evaluating older people with low educational levels. However, more studies are needed to prove the validity of the RUDAS on Chilean older people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715235/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia e Neuropsychologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia e Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗兰德老年痴呆症通用评估量表(RUDAS)是一种认知筛查方法,用于评估教育水平较低的老年人。在智利,还没有对这一人群进行评估的标准数据:获取智利受教育年限不超过 12 年的老年人的 RUDAS 标准数据,并确定年龄和受教育年限是否会影响一个人在 RUDAS 及其构成项目上的表现:评估对象为 60 岁或以上、受教育年限不超过 12 年、认知能力健康的人群(人数为 135 人)。采用多元回归模型,根据年龄和受教育年限获得 RUDAS 的标准数据,并测量受教育年限对不同项目的影响:回归分析表明,除视觉建构项目外,其他项目的预测因素均与就学无关。年龄和学校教育变量解释了 12.6% 的 RUDAS 总分方差(R^2=0.126)。视觉构造项目与受教育程度的关联度最高(OR=1 147):本研究表明,RUDAS 是评估低教育水平老年人的推荐工具。然而,还需要更多的研究来证明 RUDAS 对智利老年人的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normalization of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) in Chilean older people.

Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) is a cognitive screening that evaluates older people with low educational levels. In Chile, there are no normative data to assess this population.

Objective: To obtain normative data on RUDAS in older Chilean people with up to 12 years of schooling, and to determine whether age and schooling years influence a person's performance on RUDAS and on the items that constitute it.

Methods: A group of cognitively healthy people 60 years old or over, with up to 12 schooling years was evaluated (n=135). Multiple regression models were applied to obtain normative data on RUDAS, according to age and schooling years, and to measure the effects of schooling on different items.

Results: Regression analysis showed that none of the items had schooling as a significant predictor, except for the visuoconstruction item. The variables age and schooling explained 12.6% (R^2=0.126) of the RUDAS total score variance. The item visuoconstruction was the most associated with the educational level (OR=1,147).

Conclusion: This study showed that RUDAS is a recommended instrument for evaluating older people with low educational levels. However, more studies are needed to prove the validity of the RUDAS on Chilean older people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia e Neuropsychologia
Dementia e Neuropsychologia Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dementia top Neuropsychologia the official scientific journal of the Cognitive Neurology and Ageing Department of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology and of the Brazilian Association of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry, is published by the "Associação Neurologia Cognitiva e do Comportamento", a nonprofit Brazilian association. Regularly published on March, June, September, and December since 2007.
期刊最新文献
Brain morphometry in transient global amnesia: a triangulated analysis approach. Executive functions, mental health, and quality of life in healthy older adults. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in clinical practice in Brazil: recommendations from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Use of anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease in Brazil: a position paper from the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. Caring for people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic:a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1