比较不同 SPECT/CT 系统获得的骨 SUV。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1967/s002449912602
Mana Yoshimura, Natsumi Kugai, Togo Aida, Daisuke Hakamata, Narii Miyajima, Yoshitake Takahashi
{"title":"比较不同 SPECT/CT 系统获得的骨 SUV。","authors":"Mana Yoshimura, Natsumi Kugai, Togo Aida, Daisuke Hakamata, Narii Miyajima, Yoshitake Takahashi","doi":"10.1967/s002449912602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In bone scintigraphy, it is difficult to compare quantitative values, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), obtained from 2 different single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) devices owing to differences of imaging acquisition and analysis methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the SUV obtained from different SPECT/CT devices using the ratio to normal bone, and to analyze the correlation between them.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A total of 27 prostate cancer patients who underwent bone scintigraphy either using Symbia T16 or Symbia Intevo (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) were retrospectively analyzed. In each patient, spherical voxels of interest were placed on the following 5 reference points: humeral head (humerus), femoral neck (femur), lower part of the ilium (ilium), first lumbar vertebra (L1), fifth lumbar vertebra (L5), and the maximum SUV (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and average SUV (SUV<sub>ave</sub>) of these regions were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean and variance of SUV<sub>ave</sub> (humerus) was the smallest on both SPECT/CT. To compare the SUV obtained from the 2 devices, the SUV<sub>ave</sub> ratio and SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio of each region were calculated as the SUV<sub>ave</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub> of each region divided by the SUV<sub>ave</sub> of the humeral head in each patient. Median values of the SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio and SUV<sub>ave</sub> ratio of each region showed similar tendencies in both devices, with correlation coefficients between 0.93 and 1.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that by expressing the quantitative value of SUV<sub>ave</sub> of each region as a ratio to the SUV<sub>ave</sub> of the humeral head, accumulation in the targeted bone can be compared even when the imaging acquisition and analysis methodsare different.</p>","PeriodicalId":12871,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of bone SUV obtained from different SPECT/CT systems.\",\"authors\":\"Mana Yoshimura, Natsumi Kugai, Togo Aida, Daisuke Hakamata, Narii Miyajima, Yoshitake Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1967/s002449912602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In bone scintigraphy, it is difficult to compare quantitative values, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), obtained from 2 different single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) devices owing to differences of imaging acquisition and analysis methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the SUV obtained from different SPECT/CT devices using the ratio to normal bone, and to analyze the correlation between them.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A total of 27 prostate cancer patients who underwent bone scintigraphy either using Symbia T16 or Symbia Intevo (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) were retrospectively analyzed. In each patient, spherical voxels of interest were placed on the following 5 reference points: humeral head (humerus), femoral neck (femur), lower part of the ilium (ilium), first lumbar vertebra (L1), fifth lumbar vertebra (L5), and the maximum SUV (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and average SUV (SUV<sub>ave</sub>) of these regions were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean and variance of SUV<sub>ave</sub> (humerus) was the smallest on both SPECT/CT. To compare the SUV obtained from the 2 devices, the SUV<sub>ave</sub> ratio and SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio of each region were calculated as the SUV<sub>ave</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub> of each region divided by the SUV<sub>ave</sub> of the humeral head in each patient. Median values of the SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio and SUV<sub>ave</sub> ratio of each region showed similar tendencies in both devices, with correlation coefficients between 0.93 and 1.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that by expressing the quantitative value of SUV<sub>ave</sub> of each region as a ratio to the SUV<sub>ave</sub> of the humeral head, accumulation in the targeted bone can be compared even when the imaging acquisition and analysis methodsare different.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912602\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在骨闪烁成像中,由于成像采集和分析方法的不同,很难比较两种不同的单光子发射计算机断层扫描结合计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)设备获得的定量值,如标准化摄取值(SUV)。因此,本研究的目的是利用与正常骨骼的比值来比较不同 SPECT/CT 设备获得的 SUV 值,并分析它们之间的相关性:回顾性分析了使用 Symbia T16 或 Symbia Intevo(西门子医疗解决方案公司,德国埃尔兰根)进行骨扫描的 27 位前列腺癌患者。在每位患者的肱骨头(肱骨)、股骨颈(股骨)、髂骨下部(髂骨)、第一腰椎(L1)、第五腰椎(L5)5 个参考点上放置感兴趣的球形体素,并测量这些区域的最大 SUV(SUVmax)和平均 SUV(SUVave):两种 SPECT/CT 的 SUVave(肱骨)平均值和方差均最小。为了比较两种设备获得的 SUV,计算了每个区域的 SUVave 比值和 SUVmax 比值,即每个区域的 SUVave 和 SUVmax 除以每位患者肱骨头的 SUVave。两种设备的各区域 SUVmax 比值和 SUVave 比值的中值显示出相似的趋势,相关系数介于 0.93 和 1.19 之间:我们的研究结果表明,通过将每个区域的 SUVave 定量值表示为与肱骨头 SUVave 的比值,即使成像采集和分析方法不同,也能比较靶骨的积聚情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of bone SUV obtained from different SPECT/CT systems.

Objective: In bone scintigraphy, it is difficult to compare quantitative values, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), obtained from 2 different single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) devices owing to differences of imaging acquisition and analysis methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the SUV obtained from different SPECT/CT devices using the ratio to normal bone, and to analyze the correlation between them.

Subjects and methods: A total of 27 prostate cancer patients who underwent bone scintigraphy either using Symbia T16 or Symbia Intevo (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) were retrospectively analyzed. In each patient, spherical voxels of interest were placed on the following 5 reference points: humeral head (humerus), femoral neck (femur), lower part of the ilium (ilium), first lumbar vertebra (L1), fifth lumbar vertebra (L5), and the maximum SUV (SUVmax) and average SUV (SUVave) of these regions were measured.

Results: The mean and variance of SUVave (humerus) was the smallest on both SPECT/CT. To compare the SUV obtained from the 2 devices, the SUVave ratio and SUVmax ratio of each region were calculated as the SUVave and SUVmax of each region divided by the SUVave of the humeral head in each patient. Median values of the SUVmax ratio and SUVave ratio of each region showed similar tendencies in both devices, with correlation coefficients between 0.93 and 1.19.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that by expressing the quantitative value of SUVave of each region as a ratio to the SUVave of the humeral head, accumulation in the targeted bone can be compared even when the imaging acquisition and analysis methodsare different.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine published by the Hellenic Society of Nuclear Medicine in Thessaloniki, aims to contribute to research, to education and cover the scientific and professional interests of physicians, in the field of nuclear medicine and in medicine in general. The journal may publish papers of nuclear medicine and also papers that refer to related subjects as dosimetry, computer science, targeting of gene expression, radioimmunoassay, radiation protection, biology, cell trafficking, related historical brief reviews and other related subjects. Original papers are preferred. The journal may after special agreement publish supplements covering important subjects, dully reviewed and subscripted separately.
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT image of NK/T cell lymphoma in the sacroiliac joint. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and curative effect evaluation of multiple muscular tuberculosis. A comparative review of the application value of FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in lung cancer. A head-to-head comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma under different disease settings. Differentiated thyroid cancer with osteo-granulomatousinflammation: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1