设计和开展生命末期研究的方法和伦理挑战:对定性和文本证据的系统回顾。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1111/ijn.13224
Karolina Vlckova, Silvia Gonella, Laura Bavelaar, Gary Mitchell PhD, Tamara Sussman
{"title":"设计和开展生命末期研究的方法和伦理挑战:对定性和文本证据的系统回顾。","authors":"Karolina Vlckova,&nbsp;Silvia Gonella,&nbsp;Laura Bavelaar,&nbsp;Gary Mitchell PhD,&nbsp;Tamara Sussman","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Review methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Vlckova,&nbsp;Silvia Gonella,&nbsp;Laura Bavelaar,&nbsp;Gary Mitchell PhD,&nbsp;Tamara Sussman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.13224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review was conducted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Review methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在从研究人员的角度出发,确定设计和开展生命末期研究在方法和伦理方面面临的挑战,并提出一系列建议:背景:与面临生命末期问题的患者和家庭照护者一起开展研究在伦理和方法上都很复杂:设计:进行了系统性回顾:数据来源:对四个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycInfo)进行了检索,检索时间从开始到2021年结束(2022年2月):综述方法:遵循《系统综述首选报告项目》,采用 JBI 定性综合方法进行分析:结果:1983 项研究中有 17 项符合纳入标准。数据提炼出六大主题。这些主题包括:(1) 在研究过程的各个阶段都需要有灵活性;(2) 认真注意时间安排;(3) 方法的敏感性;(4) 利益相关者合作的重要性;(5) 需要研究人员具备独特的技能;(6) 需要处理数据缺失的问题:研究结果阐明了在这一领域开展研究时可以借鉴的培训计划、伦理审查程序和研究设计的若干注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life: A systematic review of qualitative and textual evidence

Aim

This systematic review aims to identify methodological and ethical challenges in designing and conducting research at the end of life from the perspective of researchers and provide a set of recommendations.

Background

Conducting research with patients and family carers facing end-of-life issues is ethically and methodologically complex.

Design

A systematic review was conducted.

Data sources

Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo) were searched from inception until the end of 2021 in February 2022.

Review methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews was followed, and the JBI Approach to qualitative synthesis was used for analysis.

Results

Seventeen of 1983 studies met inclusion criteria. Data were distilled to six main themes. These included (1) the need for flexibility at all stages of the research process; (2) careful attention to timing; (3) sensitivity in approach; (4) the importance of stakeholder collaboration; (5) the need for unique researcher skills; and (6) the need to deal with the issue of missing data.

Conclusion

The findings illuminate several considerations that can inform training programmes, ethical review processes and research designs when embarking on research in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Testing of the Cross-Culturally Adapted Thai Version of the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Patient Self-Care Scale in Caregivers of Patients With Chronic Illnesses. Establishment of Evidence-Based Nursing Indices for Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery. Prevalence and influencing factors of cognitive frailty among Chinese older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 'Development and Psychometric Testing of the Lean Management Scale for Nursing Services in Hospitals'. Examining the Influence of Health-Related Quality of Life on Job Satisfaction Among Nurses in Kazakhstan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1