Qayoom Yousuf, Aamir Rashid, Imran Hafeez, Hilal Rather, Ishrath Syed, Altaf H Mir, Suheel A Mir, Ajaz Lone
{"title":"首次经静脉植入心脏电子设备后静脉狭窄的发生率和预测因素","authors":"Qayoom Yousuf, Aamir Rashid, Imran Hafeez, Hilal Rather, Ishrath Syed, Altaf H Mir, Suheel A Mir, Ajaz Lone","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Very few studies have been done on Venous stenosis following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation. We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of Venous stenosis/Occlusion following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation with venous angiography at one year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center prospective, observational study. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and device data was collected. All patients underwent a preimplant contrast and repeated venography at twelve months to look for upper limb venous anatomy, obstruction, or collaterals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients were included in the final analysis. 60 (41 %) patients developed some degree of venous stenosis. Most patients had mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all were asymptomatic. Among patient-related factors increasing age (64.66 ± 10.07 vs 60.91 ± 11.94 years p = 0.04), presence of hypertension (50.5 % vs 19.6 % p = 0.0004), diabetes (73 % vs 29.6 % p = 0.000) and dyslipidemia (66.7 % vs 36.3 p = 0.009) were significantly associated with Venous stenosis/occlusion. Among procedure-related factors, larger total lead diameter (3.88 ± 1.09 vs. 3.50 ± 1.03 mm p = 0.03) and implantation of biventricular devices (p = 0.0037) seem to be significantly associated with venous obstruction. In logistic regression analysis, hypertension (p = 0.018), total lead diameter (p = 0.024), and use of CRT-P/CRTD/ICD (p = 0.03) remained significant predictors of severe venous stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates venous obstruction in 40 % of cardiac implantable electronic device patients at one-year follow-up. Most patients have mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all are asymptomatic. Increasing age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, larger total lead diameter, and implantation of biventricular devices are significantly associated with venous obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"35 4","pages":"301-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10727134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Predictors of Venous Stenosis Following First Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Qayoom Yousuf, Aamir Rashid, Imran Hafeez, Hilal Rather, Ishrath Syed, Altaf H Mir, Suheel A Mir, Ajaz Lone\",\"doi\":\"10.37616/2212-5043.1358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Very few studies have been done on Venous stenosis following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation. We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of Venous stenosis/Occlusion following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation with venous angiography at one year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center prospective, observational study. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and device data was collected. All patients underwent a preimplant contrast and repeated venography at twelve months to look for upper limb venous anatomy, obstruction, or collaterals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients were included in the final analysis. 60 (41 %) patients developed some degree of venous stenosis. Most patients had mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all were asymptomatic. Among patient-related factors increasing age (64.66 ± 10.07 vs 60.91 ± 11.94 years p = 0.04), presence of hypertension (50.5 % vs 19.6 % p = 0.0004), diabetes (73 % vs 29.6 % p = 0.000) and dyslipidemia (66.7 % vs 36.3 p = 0.009) were significantly associated with Venous stenosis/occlusion. Among procedure-related factors, larger total lead diameter (3.88 ± 1.09 vs. 3.50 ± 1.03 mm p = 0.03) and implantation of biventricular devices (p = 0.0037) seem to be significantly associated with venous obstruction. In logistic regression analysis, hypertension (p = 0.018), total lead diameter (p = 0.024), and use of CRT-P/CRTD/ICD (p = 0.03) remained significant predictors of severe venous stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates venous obstruction in 40 % of cardiac implantable electronic device patients at one-year follow-up. Most patients have mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all are asymptomatic. Increasing age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, larger total lead diameter, and implantation of biventricular devices are significantly associated with venous obstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"301-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10727134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:关于首次植入经静脉心脏设备后静脉狭窄的研究很少。我们旨在通过静脉血管造影术评估首次植入经静脉心脏设备一年后静脉狭窄/闭塞的发生率和预测因素:本研究是一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。收集了人口统计学、临床、手术和装置数据。所有患者都接受了植入前对比检查,并在 12 个月时重复进行静脉造影,以观察上肢静脉解剖、阻塞或袢:结果:共有 146 名患者被纳入最终分析。60名患者(41%)出现了一定程度的静脉狭窄。大多数患者为轻度至中度狭窄,几乎所有患者都没有症状。在患者相关因素中,年龄增长(64.66 ± 10.07 岁 vs 60.91 ± 11.94 岁,P = 0.04)、高血压(50.5 % vs 19.6 %,P = 0.0004)、糖尿病(73 % vs 29.6 %,P = 0.000)和血脂异常(66.7 % vs 36.3 %,P = 0.009)与静脉狭窄/闭塞显著相关。在手术相关因素中,导联总直径较大(3.88 ± 1.09 vs. 3.50 ± 1.03 mm p = 0.03)和植入双心室装置(p = 0.0037)似乎与静脉阻塞显著相关。在逻辑回归分析中,高血压(p = 0.018)、总导联直径(p = 0.024)和使用 CRT-P/CRTD/ICD(p = 0.03)仍是严重静脉狭窄的重要预测因素:我们的研究表明,40%的心脏植入式电子装置患者在随访一年后会出现静脉阻塞。大多数患者为轻度至中度狭窄,几乎所有患者都没有症状。年龄增大、高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、导联总直径增大以及植入双心室装置与静脉阻塞有很大关系。
Prevalence and Predictors of Venous Stenosis Following First Transvenous Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation.
Objectives: Very few studies have been done on Venous stenosis following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation. We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of Venous stenosis/Occlusion following the first transvenous cardiac device implantation with venous angiography at one year of follow-up.
Methods: This study was a single-center prospective, observational study. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and device data was collected. All patients underwent a preimplant contrast and repeated venography at twelve months to look for upper limb venous anatomy, obstruction, or collaterals.
Results: A total of 146 patients were included in the final analysis. 60 (41 %) patients developed some degree of venous stenosis. Most patients had mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all were asymptomatic. Among patient-related factors increasing age (64.66 ± 10.07 vs 60.91 ± 11.94 years p = 0.04), presence of hypertension (50.5 % vs 19.6 % p = 0.0004), diabetes (73 % vs 29.6 % p = 0.000) and dyslipidemia (66.7 % vs 36.3 p = 0.009) were significantly associated with Venous stenosis/occlusion. Among procedure-related factors, larger total lead diameter (3.88 ± 1.09 vs. 3.50 ± 1.03 mm p = 0.03) and implantation of biventricular devices (p = 0.0037) seem to be significantly associated with venous obstruction. In logistic regression analysis, hypertension (p = 0.018), total lead diameter (p = 0.024), and use of CRT-P/CRTD/ICD (p = 0.03) remained significant predictors of severe venous stenosis.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrates venous obstruction in 40 % of cardiac implantable electronic device patients at one-year follow-up. Most patients have mild to moderate stenosis, and almost all are asymptomatic. Increasing age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, larger total lead diameter, and implantation of biventricular devices are significantly associated with venous obstruction.