母乳喂养和哺乳干预中的伦理问题:范围审查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/08903344231215073
Supriya Subramani, Rasita Vinay, Julian W März, Michaela Hefti, Nikola Biller-Andorno
{"title":"母乳喂养和哺乳干预中的伦理问题:范围审查。","authors":"Supriya Subramani, Rasita Vinay, Julian W März, Michaela Hefti, Nikola Biller-Andorno","doi":"10.1177/08903344231215073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infant feeding interventions that promote and support breastfeeding are considered important contributions to global public health. As these interventions often target private settings (e.g., individuals' homes) and involve vulnerable populations (e.g., pregnant women, infants, and underprivileged families), a keen awareness of ethical issues is crucial.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to capture the key elements of the current ethical discourse regarding breastfeeding and lactation interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodology to identify the ethical issues of breastfeeding and lactation interventions as they are reflected in the scholarly literature published between January 1990 and October 2022. Abstracts (<i>N</i> = 3715) from PubMed, ScienceDirect, JSTOR and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened. The final sample consisted of 26 publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurring ethical issues identified in these studies were: the normative assumptions of motherhood; maternal autonomy and informed choice; information disclosure, balancing risks and benefits, and counseling practices; stigma and social context; ethics of health communication in breastfeeding campaigns; and the ethical acceptability of financial incentives in breastfeeding interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review illustrated that, while a wide range of ethical arguments were examined, the emphasis has been primarily on accounting for mothers' experiences and lactating persons' choices, as well as achieving public health objectives relating to infant nutrition in breastfeeding interventions. To effectively and ethically implement breastfeeding and lactation interventions, we must consider the social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they occur. One key learning identified was that women's experiences were missing in these interventions and, in response, we suggest moving beyond the dichotomous approach of individual health versus population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"150-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Issues in Breastfeeding and Lactation Interventions: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Supriya Subramani, Rasita Vinay, Julian W März, Michaela Hefti, Nikola Biller-Andorno\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08903344231215073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infant feeding interventions that promote and support breastfeeding are considered important contributions to global public health. As these interventions often target private settings (e.g., individuals' homes) and involve vulnerable populations (e.g., pregnant women, infants, and underprivileged families), a keen awareness of ethical issues is crucial.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to capture the key elements of the current ethical discourse regarding breastfeeding and lactation interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodology to identify the ethical issues of breastfeeding and lactation interventions as they are reflected in the scholarly literature published between January 1990 and October 2022. Abstracts (<i>N</i> = 3715) from PubMed, ScienceDirect, JSTOR and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened. The final sample consisted of 26 publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recurring ethical issues identified in these studies were: the normative assumptions of motherhood; maternal autonomy and informed choice; information disclosure, balancing risks and benefits, and counseling practices; stigma and social context; ethics of health communication in breastfeeding campaigns; and the ethical acceptability of financial incentives in breastfeeding interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review illustrated that, while a wide range of ethical arguments were examined, the emphasis has been primarily on accounting for mothers' experiences and lactating persons' choices, as well as achieving public health objectives relating to infant nutrition in breastfeeding interventions. To effectively and ethically implement breastfeeding and lactation interventions, we must consider the social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they occur. One key learning identified was that women's experiences were missing in these interventions and, in response, we suggest moving beyond the dichotomous approach of individual health versus population health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"150-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799543/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Lactation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231215073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231215073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:促进和支持母乳喂养的婴儿喂养干预措施被认为是对全球公共卫生的重要贡献。由于这些干预措施通常针对私人环境(如个人家庭),并涉及弱势群体(如孕妇、婴儿和贫困家庭),因此敏锐地意识到伦理问题至关重要。研究目的:本范围综述旨在捕捉当前有关母乳喂养和哺乳干预措施的伦理讨论的关键要素:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的方法进行了一次范围界定审查,以确定 1990 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月间发表的学术文献中所反映的母乳喂养和哺乳干预的伦理问题。我们筛选了 PubMed、ScienceDirect、JSTOR 和 Cochrane 系统综述数据库中的摘要(N = 3715)。最终样本包括 26 篇出版物:这些研究中反复出现的伦理问题包括:母亲身份的规范性假设;产妇自主权和知情选择;信息披露、平衡风险和收益以及咨询实践;污名化和社会背景;母乳喂养运动中的健康传播伦理;以及母乳喂养干预中经济激励的伦理可接受性:本综述表明,虽然对各种伦理论点进行了研究,但重点主要是考虑母亲的经历和哺乳者的选择,以及在母乳喂养干预措施中实现与婴儿营养有关的公共卫生目标。为了有效地、合乎道德地实施母乳喂养和哺乳干预,我们必须考虑到干预所处的社会、经济和文化背景。我们发现的一个关键问题是,在这些干预措施中缺少妇女的经验,对此,我们建议超越个人健康与群体健康的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical Issues in Breastfeeding and Lactation Interventions: A Scoping Review.

Background: Infant feeding interventions that promote and support breastfeeding are considered important contributions to global public health. As these interventions often target private settings (e.g., individuals' homes) and involve vulnerable populations (e.g., pregnant women, infants, and underprivileged families), a keen awareness of ethical issues is crucial.

Research aim: The purpose of this scoping review was to capture the key elements of the current ethical discourse regarding breastfeeding and lactation interventions.

Method: A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodology to identify the ethical issues of breastfeeding and lactation interventions as they are reflected in the scholarly literature published between January 1990 and October 2022. Abstracts (N = 3715) from PubMed, ScienceDirect, JSTOR and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened. The final sample consisted of 26 publications.

Results: The recurring ethical issues identified in these studies were: the normative assumptions of motherhood; maternal autonomy and informed choice; information disclosure, balancing risks and benefits, and counseling practices; stigma and social context; ethics of health communication in breastfeeding campaigns; and the ethical acceptability of financial incentives in breastfeeding interventions.

Conclusion: This review illustrated that, while a wide range of ethical arguments were examined, the emphasis has been primarily on accounting for mothers' experiences and lactating persons' choices, as well as achieving public health objectives relating to infant nutrition in breastfeeding interventions. To effectively and ethically implement breastfeeding and lactation interventions, we must consider the social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they occur. One key learning identified was that women's experiences were missing in these interventions and, in response, we suggest moving beyond the dichotomous approach of individual health versus population health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Immunological Factors and Macronutrient Content in Human Milk From Women With Subclinical Mastitis. Considerations When Measuring Exclusive Breastfeeding. Bridging the Gap Between Lactation Care and Research in Human Lactation. Utilizing Lactation Acuity to Improve Lactation Services in a U.S. Hospital. Breastfeeding Intentions, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among Medical Students in Croatia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1