比较戈伐欣草本胶囊和甲氧氯普胺缓解功能性消化不良患者胃肠道症状的效果:一项随机双盲临床试验。

IF 1.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Reviews on recent clinical trials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0115748871266848231120112355
Majid Asghari, Sajjad Ahmadpour, Mikaeil Molazadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Jafari, Ahmad Hormati, Mohammad Reza Pashaei, Yousef Mohammadpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi, Seyed Mahmoud Eshagh Hoseini
{"title":"比较戈伐欣草本胶囊和甲氧氯普胺缓解功能性消化不良患者胃肠道症状的效果:一项随机双盲临床试验。","authors":"Majid Asghari, Sajjad Ahmadpour, Mikaeil Molazadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Jafari, Ahmad Hormati, Mohammad Reza Pashaei, Yousef Mohammadpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi, Seyed Mahmoud Eshagh Hoseini","doi":"10.2174/0115748871266848231120112355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is felt as a discomfort or pain on the center line or upper abdomen. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of Govarcin herbal capsule and Metoclopramide for alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally, 106 patients enrolled in a double-blind, clinical trial study. The participants had FD and were divided into two groups receiving Govarcin and Metoclopramide by block randomization. The patients were treated for four weeks, taking one Govarcin capsule or Metoclopramide tablet after each meal. The rate of improvement in patients was assessed by mitigation of clinical symptoms, including epigastric pain, fullness, discomfort, nausea, vomiting and heartburn. Also, before and after intervention, we used Nepin questionnaire and ROME III. SPSS statistics 25 software was used for data analyzing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical symptom score changes between Govarcin and Metoclopramide patients' groups showed that there was no significant difference in any of the clinical symptom scores (except for heartburn, <i>p-value</i>=0.012) between the study groups. Nepean score in Govarcin group before and after treatment were 19.3±4.8 and 8.9±2.8, respectively (<i>p-value</i><0.001). For Metoclopramide group, these values were 19.8±3.5 and 9.4±2.1 respectively (<i>p-value</i><0.001). No significant difference was found in terms of Nepean score between the Govarcin and Metoclopramide groups (<i>p-value</i>=0.995).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Govarcin herbal capsule can be used to remedy symptoms in patients with FD. It seems that Govarcin is as effective as Metoclopramide in fighting symptoms of FD as no significant difference in efficacy has been demonstrated between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"143-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effects of Govarcin Herbal Capsule and Metoclopramide for Alleviating Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Majid Asghari, Sajjad Ahmadpour, Mikaeil Molazadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Jafari, Ahmad Hormati, Mohammad Reza Pashaei, Yousef Mohammadpour, Mohammad Amin Habibi, Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi, Seyed Mahmoud Eshagh Hoseini\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748871266848231120112355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is felt as a discomfort or pain on the center line or upper abdomen. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of Govarcin herbal capsule and Metoclopramide for alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with FD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally, 106 patients enrolled in a double-blind, clinical trial study. The participants had FD and were divided into two groups receiving Govarcin and Metoclopramide by block randomization. The patients were treated for four weeks, taking one Govarcin capsule or Metoclopramide tablet after each meal. The rate of improvement in patients was assessed by mitigation of clinical symptoms, including epigastric pain, fullness, discomfort, nausea, vomiting and heartburn. Also, before and after intervention, we used Nepin questionnaire and ROME III. SPSS statistics 25 software was used for data analyzing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical symptom score changes between Govarcin and Metoclopramide patients' groups showed that there was no significant difference in any of the clinical symptom scores (except for heartburn, <i>p-value</i>=0.012) between the study groups. Nepean score in Govarcin group before and after treatment were 19.3±4.8 and 8.9±2.8, respectively (<i>p-value</i><0.001). For Metoclopramide group, these values were 19.8±3.5 and 9.4±2.1 respectively (<i>p-value</i><0.001). No significant difference was found in terms of Nepean score between the Govarcin and Metoclopramide groups (<i>p-value</i>=0.995).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Govarcin herbal capsule can be used to remedy symptoms in patients with FD. It seems that Govarcin is as effective as Metoclopramide in fighting symptoms of FD as no significant difference in efficacy has been demonstrated between them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"143-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871266848231120112355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871266848231120112355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能性消化不良(FD)是指腹部正中线或上腹部的不适或疼痛。在这项研究中,我们探讨了高伐素草本胶囊对功能性消化不良的疗效,如果疗效显著,则可用于该病患者的治疗:方法:共有 106 名患者参加了双盲临床试验研究。方法:共有 106 名患者参加了这项双盲临床试验研究,他们都患有 FD,并被随机分为两组,分别接受高伐霉素和甲氧氯普胺治疗。患者接受为期四周的治疗,每餐后服用一粒高伐林胶囊或甲氧氯普胺片剂。通过减轻上腹痛、饱胀、不适、恶心、呕吐和烧心等临床症状来评估患者的改善率。此外,在干预前后,我们还使用了 Nepin 问卷和 ROME III。数据分析采用 SPSS 统计 25 软件:高伐林组和甲氧氯普胺组患者的临床症状评分变化显示,研究组之间的任何临床症状评分均无显著差异(烧心除外,P-vale=0.012)。高伐霉素组治疗前后的尼泊金评分分别为(19.3±4.8)分和(8.9±2.8)分(p-value):Govarcin中药胶囊可用于治疗FD患者的症状。在消除 FD 症状方面,Guarcin 似乎与甲氧氯普胺一样有效,因为两者的疗效没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effects of Govarcin Herbal Capsule and Metoclopramide for Alleviating Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is felt as a discomfort or pain on the center line or upper abdomen. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of Govarcin herbal capsule and Metoclopramide for alleviating gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with FD.

Methods: Totally, 106 patients enrolled in a double-blind, clinical trial study. The participants had FD and were divided into two groups receiving Govarcin and Metoclopramide by block randomization. The patients were treated for four weeks, taking one Govarcin capsule or Metoclopramide tablet after each meal. The rate of improvement in patients was assessed by mitigation of clinical symptoms, including epigastric pain, fullness, discomfort, nausea, vomiting and heartburn. Also, before and after intervention, we used Nepin questionnaire and ROME III. SPSS statistics 25 software was used for data analyzing.

Results: Clinical symptom score changes between Govarcin and Metoclopramide patients' groups showed that there was no significant difference in any of the clinical symptom scores (except for heartburn, p-value=0.012) between the study groups. Nepean score in Govarcin group before and after treatment were 19.3±4.8 and 8.9±2.8, respectively (p-value<0.001). For Metoclopramide group, these values were 19.8±3.5 and 9.4±2.1 respectively (p-value<0.001). No significant difference was found in terms of Nepean score between the Govarcin and Metoclopramide groups (p-value=0.995).

Conclusion: Govarcin herbal capsule can be used to remedy symptoms in patients with FD. It seems that Govarcin is as effective as Metoclopramide in fighting symptoms of FD as no significant difference in efficacy has been demonstrated between them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on recent clinical trials
Reviews on recent clinical trials PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the Mysteries of Alzheimer's Disease Using Artificial Intelligence. Non-alcoholic Wernicke Encephalopathy in a Young Patient with Adenocarcinoma of the Colon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. The Efficacy of Two Triple Therapy Regimens and One Quadruple Regimen [Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, Metronidazole with Bismuth] in Eradicating Helicobacter Pylori in Patients with Peptic Ulcer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ongoing Clinical Trials for Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Afflicted Infertility in Women: A Narrative Review. Etiology, Recent Advances, and Clinical Trials Data for the Treatment of Angioedema: A Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1