[将连续变量二分时统计能力的巨大损失]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33588/rn.7801.2023163
C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente
{"title":"[将连续变量二分时统计能力的巨大损失]。","authors":"C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente","doi":"10.33588/rn.7801.2023163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A very common practice in medical research, during the process of data analysis, is to dichotomise numerical variables in two groups. This leads to the loss of very useful information that can undermine the effectiveness of the research. Several examples are used to show how the dichotomisation of numerical variables can lead to a loss of statistical power in studies. This can be a critical aspect in assessing, for example, whether a therapeutic procedure is more effective or whether a certain factor is a risk factor. Dichotomising continuous variables is therefore not recommended unless there is a very specific reason to do so.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"27-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The dramatic loss of statistical power when dichotomising continuous variables].\",\"authors\":\"C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7801.2023163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A very common practice in medical research, during the process of data analysis, is to dichotomise numerical variables in two groups. This leads to the loss of very useful information that can undermine the effectiveness of the research. Several examples are used to show how the dichotomisation of numerical variables can lead to a loss of statistical power in studies. This can be a critical aspect in assessing, for example, whether a therapeutic procedure is more effective or whether a certain factor is a risk factor. Dichotomising continuous variables is therefore not recommended unless there is a very specific reason to do so.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"27-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7801.2023163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7801.2023163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在数据分析过程中,医学研究中一种非常常见的做法是将数字变量分为两组。这种做法会导致非常有用的信息丢失,从而影响研究的有效性。我们用几个例子来说明数字变量的二分法如何导致研究中统计能力的丧失。例如,在评估治疗程序是否更有效或某一因素是否是风险因素时,这一点至关重要。因此,除非有非常特殊的原因,否则不建议对连续变量进行二分法处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The dramatic loss of statistical power when dichotomising continuous variables].

A very common practice in medical research, during the process of data analysis, is to dichotomise numerical variables in two groups. This leads to the loss of very useful information that can undermine the effectiveness of the research. Several examples are used to show how the dichotomisation of numerical variables can lead to a loss of statistical power in studies. This can be a critical aspect in assessing, for example, whether a therapeutic procedure is more effective or whether a certain factor is a risk factor. Dichotomising continuous variables is therefore not recommended unless there is a very specific reason to do so.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
[Cognition and Long COVID: A PRISMA Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies]. [Neurology in Bohemian Lights]. The Efficacy of Boxing Training on Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Referral Profile of Adult Patients Attended in the Neuropsychology Consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz in Madrid from 2018 to 2023]. [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1