监护:住院医生对照顾无行为能力、无代言人的老年人的看法的影响。

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23337214231218581
Linda Wang, Jared Morphew, Caroline Vitale, Patricia Mullan, Kahli Zietlow
{"title":"监护:住院医生对照顾无行为能力、无代言人的老年人的看法的影响。","authors":"Linda Wang, Jared Morphew, Caroline Vitale, Patricia Mullan, Kahli Zietlow","doi":"10.1177/23337214231218581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the incidence of dementia rises, increased utilization of surrogate decision-makers, including legal guardians, is anticipated. This manuscript presents an analysis of resident physicians' experiences and perceptions regarding requirements, roles, and responsibilities of caring for older adults in need of, or already under, legal guardianship. This is a cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. A survey was sent, via Qualtrics, to all emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, and medicine-pediatric resident physicians. Eighty-eight out of three hundred thirty-three (26.4%) eligible residents physicians completed the survey. Most (98.9%) reported caring for patients under guardianship, yet many resident physicians reported significant uncertainty regarding the roles and responsibilities of guardianship, including its potential benefits and limitations. They also displayed misconceptions and overconfidence about guardians' abilities to facilitate disposition, ensure financial security, and assign code status, among other matters. Our study highlights the importance of structured and directed education on the topic of guardianship for medical trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":52146,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10725095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guardianship: The Implications of Resident Physician Perceptions of Caring for Incapacitated Older Adults Without Advocates.\",\"authors\":\"Linda Wang, Jared Morphew, Caroline Vitale, Patricia Mullan, Kahli Zietlow\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23337214231218581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the incidence of dementia rises, increased utilization of surrogate decision-makers, including legal guardians, is anticipated. This manuscript presents an analysis of resident physicians' experiences and perceptions regarding requirements, roles, and responsibilities of caring for older adults in need of, or already under, legal guardianship. This is a cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. A survey was sent, via Qualtrics, to all emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, and medicine-pediatric resident physicians. Eighty-eight out of three hundred thirty-three (26.4%) eligible residents physicians completed the survey. Most (98.9%) reported caring for patients under guardianship, yet many resident physicians reported significant uncertainty regarding the roles and responsibilities of guardianship, including its potential benefits and limitations. They also displayed misconceptions and overconfidence about guardians' abilities to facilitate disposition, ensure financial security, and assign code status, among other matters. Our study highlights the importance of structured and directed education on the topic of guardianship for medical trainees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10725095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231218581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231218581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着痴呆症发病率的上升,包括法定监护人在内的代理决策者的使用率预计会增加。本手稿分析了住院医生在照顾需要或已经接受法定监护的老年人时的要求、角色和责任方面的经验和看法。这是一项横断面研究,在一家三级学术医疗中心进行。我们通过 Qualtrics 向所有急诊科、家庭医学科、内科、普外科和儿科住院医师发送了一份调查问卷。在 333 名符合条件的住院医师中,有 88 名(26.4%)完成了调查。大多数住院医师(98.9%)表示曾在监护人的监护下照顾过病人,但许多住院医师表示对监护人的角色和责任,包括其潜在的益处和局限性有很大的不确定性。他们还对监护人在促进处置、确保经济安全和分配代码状态等方面的能力表现出误解和过度自信。我们的研究强调了对医学实习生进行有组织、有指导的监护专题教育的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guardianship: The Implications of Resident Physician Perceptions of Caring for Incapacitated Older Adults Without Advocates.

As the incidence of dementia rises, increased utilization of surrogate decision-makers, including legal guardians, is anticipated. This manuscript presents an analysis of resident physicians' experiences and perceptions regarding requirements, roles, and responsibilities of caring for older adults in need of, or already under, legal guardianship. This is a cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. A survey was sent, via Qualtrics, to all emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, and medicine-pediatric resident physicians. Eighty-eight out of three hundred thirty-three (26.4%) eligible residents physicians completed the survey. Most (98.9%) reported caring for patients under guardianship, yet many resident physicians reported significant uncertainty regarding the roles and responsibilities of guardianship, including its potential benefits and limitations. They also displayed misconceptions and overconfidence about guardians' abilities to facilitate disposition, ensure financial security, and assign code status, among other matters. Our study highlights the importance of structured and directed education on the topic of guardianship for medical trainees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, GGM facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Quantile Regression and Gaussian (Z-scores) Percentiles to BSA in Growth Charts With a Pakistani Population. Risk Factor Analysis in Patients Exhibiting Cerebral Microbleeds and the Correlation with Cognitive Impairment. A Novel Protocol for the Early Detection of COVID-19 at a Skilled Nursing Facility. Understanding Pandemic Increases in Long-Stay Psychotropic Prescribing for Dementia Symptoms: A Survey of Nursing Home Clinicians. Patient Autonomy Versus Intervention: Geriatric Care Dilemmas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1