使用 BiSect 采用钳夹法进行腹腔镜肝脏切除术的安全性和可行性。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Nippon Medical School Pub Date : 2024-03-09 Epub Date: 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-112
Masato Yoshioka, Tetsuya Shimizu, Junji Ueda, Mampei Kawashima, Toshiyuki Irie, Takahiro Haruna, Takashi Ohno, Yoichi Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuguchi, Akira Matsushita, Nobuhiko Taniai, Hiroshi Yoshida
{"title":"使用 BiSect 采用钳夹法进行腹腔镜肝脏切除术的安全性和可行性。","authors":"Masato Yoshioka, Tetsuya Shimizu, Junji Ueda, Mampei Kawashima, Toshiyuki Irie, Takahiro Haruna, Takashi Ohno, Yoichi Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuguchi, Akira Matsushita, Nobuhiko Taniai, Hiroshi Yoshida","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various energy devices are available for resection of the liver parenchyma during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). We have historically performed liver resections using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA). More recently, we have used new bipolar forceps (BiSect; Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) to perform clamp-crush dissection with good results. The BiSect is a reusable bipolar forceps with a laparoscopic dissecting forceps tip and both an incision mode and coagulation mode. We evaluated the perioperative clinical course of patients who underwent LLR using the clamp-crush method with the BiSect compared with the CUSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center case control study involved patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer who underwent LLR using either the BiSect or CUSA at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. We performed the LLR using CUSA from January 2019 to early October 2020. After introduction of the BiSect in late October 2020, we used BiSect for the LLR. Before surgery, the three-dimensional liver was constructed based on computed tomography images, and a preoperative simulation was performed. We evaluated the results of LLR using the BiSect versus the CUSA and assessed the short-term results of LLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, we performed partial liver resection using the BiSect in 26 patients and the CUSA in 16 patients. In the BiSect group, the median bleeding volume was 55 mL, the median operation time was 227 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days. In the CUSA group, the median bleeding volume was 87 mL, the median operation time was 305 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical course including bile leakage, bile duct stenosis, and post operative hospital stay between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with LLR using the CUSA, the clamp-crush method using the BiSect in LLR is a safe and useful liver transection technique. Further study should be conducted to clarify whether BiSect is safe and useful in LLR for patients with other tumor types and patients who undergo other procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Clamp-Crush Method Using the BiSect.\",\"authors\":\"Masato Yoshioka, Tetsuya Shimizu, Junji Ueda, Mampei Kawashima, Toshiyuki Irie, Takahiro Haruna, Takashi Ohno, Yoichi Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuguchi, Akira Matsushita, Nobuhiko Taniai, Hiroshi Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various energy devices are available for resection of the liver parenchyma during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). We have historically performed liver resections using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA). More recently, we have used new bipolar forceps (BiSect; Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) to perform clamp-crush dissection with good results. The BiSect is a reusable bipolar forceps with a laparoscopic dissecting forceps tip and both an incision mode and coagulation mode. We evaluated the perioperative clinical course of patients who underwent LLR using the clamp-crush method with the BiSect compared with the CUSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center case control study involved patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer who underwent LLR using either the BiSect or CUSA at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. We performed the LLR using CUSA from January 2019 to early October 2020. After introduction of the BiSect in late October 2020, we used BiSect for the LLR. Before surgery, the three-dimensional liver was constructed based on computed tomography images, and a preoperative simulation was performed. We evaluated the results of LLR using the BiSect versus the CUSA and assessed the short-term results of LLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, we performed partial liver resection using the BiSect in 26 patients and the CUSA in 16 patients. In the BiSect group, the median bleeding volume was 55 mL, the median operation time was 227 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days. In the CUSA group, the median bleeding volume was 87 mL, the median operation time was 305 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical course including bile leakage, bile duct stenosis, and post operative hospital stay between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with LLR using the CUSA, the clamp-crush method using the BiSect in LLR is a safe and useful liver transection technique. Further study should be conducted to clarify whether BiSect is safe and useful in LLR for patients with other tumor types and patients who undergo other procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nippon Medical School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在腹腔镜肝脏切除术(LLR)中,有多种能量设备可用于切除肝实质。我们一直使用 Cavitron 超声波手术抽吸器(CUSA)进行肝脏切除。最近,我们使用新型双极镊子(BiSect;Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH,德国图宾根)进行钳压解剖,效果良好。BiSect 是一种可重复使用的双极镊子,具有腹腔镜剥离镊的尖端,同时具有切割模式和凝固模式。我们评估了使用 BiSect 与 CUSA 进行钳夹法 LLR 患者的围手术期临床过程:这项单中心病例对照研究涉及2019年1月至2022年12月期间在我院使用BiSect或CUSA进行LLR的结直肠癌肝转移患者。我们在 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月初使用 CUSA 进行了 LLR。手术前,我们根据计算机断层扫描图像构建了三维肝脏,并进行了术前模拟。我们评估了使用 BisSect 与 CUSA 进行 LLR 的结果,并评估了 LLR 的短期效果:在研究期间,我们使用 BiSect 对 26 名患者进行了肝脏部分切除术,使用 CUSA 对 16 名患者进行了肝脏部分切除术。BiSect 组的中位出血量为 55 毫升,中位手术时间为 227 分钟,中位术后住院时间为 9 天。CUSA 组的中位出血量为 87 毫升,中位手术时间为 305 分钟,中位术后住院时间为 10 天。两组患者在胆汁渗漏、胆管狭窄和术后住院时间等临床病程方面的差异无统计学意义:结论:与使用 CUSA 的 LLR 相比,在 LLR 中使用 BiSect 的钳夹-挤压法是一种安全有效的肝横断技术。应开展进一步研究,以明确 BiSect 在其他类型肿瘤患者和接受其他手术的患者的 LLR 中是否安全和有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Clamp-Crush Method Using the BiSect.

Background: Various energy devices are available for resection of the liver parenchyma during laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). We have historically performed liver resections using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA). More recently, we have used new bipolar forceps (BiSect; Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) to perform clamp-crush dissection with good results. The BiSect is a reusable bipolar forceps with a laparoscopic dissecting forceps tip and both an incision mode and coagulation mode. We evaluated the perioperative clinical course of patients who underwent LLR using the clamp-crush method with the BiSect compared with the CUSA.

Methods: This single-center case control study involved patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer who underwent LLR using either the BiSect or CUSA at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2022. We performed the LLR using CUSA from January 2019 to early October 2020. After introduction of the BiSect in late October 2020, we used BiSect for the LLR. Before surgery, the three-dimensional liver was constructed based on computed tomography images, and a preoperative simulation was performed. We evaluated the results of LLR using the BiSect versus the CUSA and assessed the short-term results of LLR.

Results: During the study period, we performed partial liver resection using the BiSect in 26 patients and the CUSA in 16 patients. In the BiSect group, the median bleeding volume was 55 mL, the median operation time was 227 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days. In the CUSA group, the median bleeding volume was 87 mL, the median operation time was 305 minutes, and the median postoperative length of hospital stay was 10 days. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical course including bile leakage, bile duct stenosis, and post operative hospital stay between the two groups.

Conclusions: Compared with LLR using the CUSA, the clamp-crush method using the BiSect in LLR is a safe and useful liver transection technique. Further study should be conducted to clarify whether BiSect is safe and useful in LLR for patients with other tumor types and patients who undergo other procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nippon Medical School
Journal of Nippon Medical School MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Bacteremia and Meningitis in a Neonate Infected with Group B Streptococcus via Breastfeeding Who Survived without Neurological Sequelae: A Case Report. Ravulizumab Can Effectively Treat Ischemic Enteritis Caused by Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria. Use of a rigid curved laryngoscope for observation and debridement of degenerated cricoid cartilage in nasogastric tube syndrome: A case report. 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation Suppressed by Microhook Trabeculotomy in Ocular Hypertension: A Case Report. Acute focal bacterial nephritis in an infant referred with apnea caused by mixed infection with Enterococcus raffinosus and Escherichia coli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1