用于检测住院患者 COVID-19 肺炎的手持式肺部超声波:前瞻性队列研究

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16484
Thomas F Heyne, Kay Negishi, Daniel S Choi, Ahad A Al Saud, Lucas X Marinacci, Patrick Y Smithedajkul, Lily R Devaraj, Brent P Little, Dexter P Mendoza, Efren J Flores, Milena Petranovic, Steven P Toal, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrew S Liteplo, Benjamin P Geisler
{"title":"用于检测住院患者 COVID-19 肺炎的手持式肺部超声波:前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Thomas F Heyne, Kay Negishi, Daniel S Choi, Ahad A Al Saud, Lucas X Marinacci, Patrick Y Smithedajkul, Lily R Devaraj, Brent P Little, Dexter P Mendoza, Efren J Flores, Milena Petranovic, Steven P Toal, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrew S Liteplo, Benjamin P Geisler","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Chest imaging, including chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT), can be a helpful adjunct to nucleic acid test (NAT) in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS), particularly with handheld devices, is an imaging alternative that is rapid, highly portable, and more accessible in low-resource settings. A standardized POCUS scanning protocol has been proposed to assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia, but it has not been sufficiently validated to assess diagnostic accuracy for COVID-19 pneumonia. <b>Purpose</b>: To assess the diagnostic performance of a standardized lung POCUS protocol using a handheld POCUS device to detect patients with either a positive NAT or a COVID-19-typical pattern on CT scan. Methods: Adult inpatients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and a recent CT were recruited from April to July 2020. Twelve lung zones were scanned with a handheld POCUS machine. Images were reviewed independently by blinded experts and scored according to the proposed protocol. Patients were divided into low, intermediate, and high suspicion based on their POCUS score. <b>Results</b>: Of 79 subjects, 26.6% had a positive NAT and 31.6% had a typical CT pattern. The receiver operator curve for POCUS had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787 for positive NAT and 0.820 for a typical CT. Using a two-point cutoff system, POCUS had a sensitivity of 0.90 and 1.00 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern, respectively, at the lower cutoff; it had a specificity of 0.90 and 0.89 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern at the higher cutoff, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed lung POCUS protocol with a handheld device showed reasonable diagnostic performance to detect inpatients with a positive NAT or typical CT pattern for COVID-19. Particularly in low-resource settings, POCUS with handheld devices may serve as a helpful adjunct for persons under investigation for COVID-19 pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handheld Lung Ultrasound to Detect COVID-19 Pneumonia in Inpatients: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas F Heyne, Kay Negishi, Daniel S Choi, Ahad A Al Saud, Lucas X Marinacci, Patrick Y Smithedajkul, Lily R Devaraj, Brent P Little, Dexter P Mendoza, Efren J Flores, Milena Petranovic, Steven P Toal, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrew S Liteplo, Benjamin P Geisler\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Chest imaging, including chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT), can be a helpful adjunct to nucleic acid test (NAT) in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS), particularly with handheld devices, is an imaging alternative that is rapid, highly portable, and more accessible in low-resource settings. A standardized POCUS scanning protocol has been proposed to assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia, but it has not been sufficiently validated to assess diagnostic accuracy for COVID-19 pneumonia. <b>Purpose</b>: To assess the diagnostic performance of a standardized lung POCUS protocol using a handheld POCUS device to detect patients with either a positive NAT or a COVID-19-typical pattern on CT scan. Methods: Adult inpatients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and a recent CT were recruited from April to July 2020. Twelve lung zones were scanned with a handheld POCUS machine. Images were reviewed independently by blinded experts and scored according to the proposed protocol. Patients were divided into low, intermediate, and high suspicion based on their POCUS score. <b>Results</b>: Of 79 subjects, 26.6% had a positive NAT and 31.6% had a typical CT pattern. The receiver operator curve for POCUS had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787 for positive NAT and 0.820 for a typical CT. Using a two-point cutoff system, POCUS had a sensitivity of 0.90 and 1.00 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern, respectively, at the lower cutoff; it had a specificity of 0.90 and 0.89 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern at the higher cutoff, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: The proposed lung POCUS protocol with a handheld device showed reasonable diagnostic performance to detect inpatients with a positive NAT or typical CT pattern for COVID-19. Particularly in low-resource settings, POCUS with handheld devices may serve as a helpful adjunct for persons under investigation for COVID-19 pneumonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POCUS journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POCUS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸部成像,包括胸部 X 光片 (CXR) 和计算机断层扫描 (CT),可以作为核酸检测 (NAT) 的辅助手段,帮助诊断和治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19)。肺部护理点超声(POCUS),尤其是手持式设备,是一种快速、高度便携、在低资源环境中更容易获得的成像替代方法。目前已提出一种标准化的 POCUS 扫描方案来评估 COVID-19 肺炎的严重程度,但该方案尚未经过充分验证,无法评估 COVID-19 肺炎的诊断准确性。目的:评估标准化肺部 POCUS 方案的诊断性能,该方案使用手持式 POCUS 设备检测 CT 扫描中出现 NAT 阳性或 COVID-19 典型模式的患者。检测方法2020 年 4 月至 7 月期间,招募了确诊或疑似 COVID-19 且近期做过 CT 的成人住院患者。使用手持式 POCUS 机扫描 12 个肺区。由盲法专家独立审查图像,并根据建议方案进行评分。根据患者的 POCUS 评分,将其分为低度怀疑、中度怀疑和高度怀疑。结果显示在 79 名受试者中,26.6% 的人 NAT 呈阳性,31.6% 的人有典型的 CT 模式。POCUS 的受体运算曲线曲线下面积(AUC)为:NAT 阳性 0.787,典型 CT 0.820。采用两点截断系统,在较低的截断点,POCUS 与 NAT 和典型 CT 模式相比,灵敏度分别为 0.90 和 1.00;在较高的截断点,POCUS 与 NAT 和典型 CT 模式相比,特异性分别为 0.90 和 0.89。结论使用手持设备的肺部 POCUS 方案在检测 COVID-19 NAT 阳性或典型 CT 阳性的住院患者方面表现出了合理的诊断性能。特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,使用手持式设备进行肺部 POCUS 可作为一种有用的辅助手段,用于检测 COVID-19 肺炎患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Handheld Lung Ultrasound to Detect COVID-19 Pneumonia in Inpatients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Chest imaging, including chest X-ray (CXR) and computed tomography (CT), can be a helpful adjunct to nucleic acid test (NAT) in the diagnosis and management of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS), particularly with handheld devices, is an imaging alternative that is rapid, highly portable, and more accessible in low-resource settings. A standardized POCUS scanning protocol has been proposed to assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia, but it has not been sufficiently validated to assess diagnostic accuracy for COVID-19 pneumonia. Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of a standardized lung POCUS protocol using a handheld POCUS device to detect patients with either a positive NAT or a COVID-19-typical pattern on CT scan. Methods: Adult inpatients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and a recent CT were recruited from April to July 2020. Twelve lung zones were scanned with a handheld POCUS machine. Images were reviewed independently by blinded experts and scored according to the proposed protocol. Patients were divided into low, intermediate, and high suspicion based on their POCUS score. Results: Of 79 subjects, 26.6% had a positive NAT and 31.6% had a typical CT pattern. The receiver operator curve for POCUS had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.787 for positive NAT and 0.820 for a typical CT. Using a two-point cutoff system, POCUS had a sensitivity of 0.90 and 1.00 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern, respectively, at the lower cutoff; it had a specificity of 0.90 and 0.89 compared to NAT and typical CT pattern at the higher cutoff, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed lung POCUS protocol with a handheld device showed reasonable diagnostic performance to detect inpatients with a positive NAT or typical CT pattern for COVID-19. Particularly in low-resource settings, POCUS with handheld devices may serve as a helpful adjunct for persons under investigation for COVID-19 pneumonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of Point of Care Ultrasound to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review VExUS to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis: Exploring a Novel Dimension of Point of Care Ultrasound Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Return of the Living Dead Gut – A Case Report of Ischemic Colitis Identified on Point of Care Ultrasound Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1