在基于图像存档和通信系统的磁共振成像规划下进行的经椎间孔腰椎硬膜外注射与在直接 X 光引导下进行的注射之间的比较。

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2023.1260
Zhaokui Yan, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Lixue Wu, Xiaobing Pu, Changchao Dong, Gang Tan, Hongyun Wo, Chengwei Kang
{"title":"在基于图像存档和通信系统的磁共振成像规划下进行的经椎间孔腰椎硬膜外注射与在直接 X 光引导下进行的注射之间的比较。","authors":"Zhaokui Yan, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Lixue Wu, Xiaobing Pu, Changchao Dong, Gang Tan, Hongyun Wo, Chengwei Kang","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to compare the treatment cost, operation time, clinical effect, and complications between punctures done under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planning based on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and punctures done under immediate X-ray fluoroscopy guidance in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar epidural injection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective study conducted between October 2016 and June 2021, 128 patients were randomly divided into Groups A and B by the random number table method. In Group A (n=66; 36 males, 30 females; mean age: 64.5±2.4 years, range, 50 to 72 years), puncture was performed by planning with PACS-based MRI; in Group B (n=62; 34 males, 28 females; mean age: 65.3±2.6 years; range, 48 to 73 years), puncture was performed under immediate X-ray guidance. The cost of treatment, duration of procedure, clinical outcome, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in treatment cost in Groups A and B was statistically significant (p<0.001), with 755.67±29.45 yuan and 1.158.08±43.92 yuan, respectively. The mean treatment time was statistically significant (p<0.001) between the groups, with 21.16±1.91 min in Group A and 37.26±2 min in Group B. However, there was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of improvement in pain scores and Oswestry disability index (both p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of complication rates (both p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to immediate X-ray guided puncture, the puncture method using PACS for MRI planning shortened the transforaminal lumbar epidural injection procedure time and reduced the treatment costs without exposing the physician or patient to additional radiation, while there was no significant difference in the short-term clinical outcome or complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between transforaminal lumbar epidural injection performed under picture archiving and communication systems-based magnetic resonance imaging planning and injection under immediate X-ray guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaokui Yan, Guy Romeo Kenmegne, Lixue Wu, Xiaobing Pu, Changchao Dong, Gang Tan, Hongyun Wo, Chengwei Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to compare the treatment cost, operation time, clinical effect, and complications between punctures done under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planning based on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and punctures done under immediate X-ray fluoroscopy guidance in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar epidural injection.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective study conducted between October 2016 and June 2021, 128 patients were randomly divided into Groups A and B by the random number table method. In Group A (n=66; 36 males, 30 females; mean age: 64.5±2.4 years, range, 50 to 72 years), puncture was performed by planning with PACS-based MRI; in Group B (n=62; 34 males, 28 females; mean age: 65.3±2.6 years; range, 48 to 73 years), puncture was performed under immediate X-ray guidance. The cost of treatment, duration of procedure, clinical outcome, and complications were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference in treatment cost in Groups A and B was statistically significant (p<0.001), with 755.67±29.45 yuan and 1.158.08±43.92 yuan, respectively. The mean treatment time was statistically significant (p<0.001) between the groups, with 21.16±1.91 min in Group A and 37.26±2 min in Group B. However, there was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of improvement in pain scores and Oswestry disability index (both p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of complication rates (both p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to immediate X-ray guided puncture, the puncture method using PACS for MRI planning shortened the transforaminal lumbar epidural injection procedure time and reduced the treatment costs without exposing the physician or patient to additional radiation, while there was no significant difference in the short-term clinical outcome or complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"45-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在比较在基于图像存档和通信系统(PACS)的磁共振成像(MRI)规划下进行的穿刺与在X光透视引导下立即进行的穿刺在经椎间孔腰椎硬膜外注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的治疗费用、手术时间、临床效果和并发症:在2016年10月至2021年6月进行的这项前瞻性研究中,采用随机数字表法将128名患者随机分为A组和B组。在 A 组(n=66;36 名男性,30 名女性;平均年龄:64.5±2.4 岁,范围:50 至 72 岁)中,穿刺是通过基于 PACS 的磁共振成像计划进行的;在 B 组(n=62;34 名男性,28 名女性;平均年龄:65.3±2.6 岁;范围:48 至 73 岁)中,穿刺是在即时 X 光引导下进行的。比较了两组的治疗费用、手术时间、临床结果和并发症:结果:A 组和 B 组的治疗费用差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结果:A 组和 B 组的治疗费用差异有统计学意义(P0.05),A 组和 B 组的并发症发生率差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05):结论:与即时 X 光引导穿刺相比,使用 PACS 进行磁共振成像规划的穿刺方法缩短了经椎间孔腰椎硬膜外注射的手术时间,降低了治疗成本,同时不会使医生或患者受到额外辐射,而短期临床疗效和并发症发生率则无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison between transforaminal lumbar epidural injection performed under picture archiving and communication systems-based magnetic resonance imaging planning and injection under immediate X-ray guidance.

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the treatment cost, operation time, clinical effect, and complications between punctures done under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planning based on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and punctures done under immediate X-ray fluoroscopy guidance in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar epidural injection.

Patients and methods: In this prospective study conducted between October 2016 and June 2021, 128 patients were randomly divided into Groups A and B by the random number table method. In Group A (n=66; 36 males, 30 females; mean age: 64.5±2.4 years, range, 50 to 72 years), puncture was performed by planning with PACS-based MRI; in Group B (n=62; 34 males, 28 females; mean age: 65.3±2.6 years; range, 48 to 73 years), puncture was performed under immediate X-ray guidance. The cost of treatment, duration of procedure, clinical outcome, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The difference in treatment cost in Groups A and B was statistically significant (p<0.001), with 755.67±29.45 yuan and 1.158.08±43.92 yuan, respectively. The mean treatment time was statistically significant (p<0.001) between the groups, with 21.16±1.91 min in Group A and 37.26±2 min in Group B. However, there was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of improvement in pain scores and Oswestry disability index (both p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between Group A and Group B in terms of complication rates (both p>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to immediate X-ray guided puncture, the puncture method using PACS for MRI planning shortened the transforaminal lumbar epidural injection procedure time and reduced the treatment costs without exposing the physician or patient to additional radiation, while there was no significant difference in the short-term clinical outcome or complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison between 3D printed models and standard 2D planning in the use of metal block augments in revision knee arthroplasty. A rare mass with atypical localization: Heterotopic ossification associated with flexor hallucis longus. Anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction improves sport participation and activity levels in adolescents with recurrent patellar dislocation. Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients. Chronic dislocations of the fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joints with successful treatment by ligament repair: A case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1