了解经济学混合课堂:案例研究

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS International Review of Economics Education Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282
Jonathan L. Graves , Emrul Hasan , Trish L. Varao-Sousa
{"title":"了解经济学混合课堂:案例研究","authors":"Jonathan L. Graves ,&nbsp;Emrul Hasan ,&nbsp;Trish L. Varao-Sousa","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental </span>pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45496,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the hybrid classroom in economics: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan L. Graves ,&nbsp;Emrul Hasan ,&nbsp;Trish L. Varao-Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental </span>pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388023000233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388023000233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了在 2021 年夏季采用混合(在线和面对面)教学形式讲授的中级计量经济学课程中,在线学生和面对面学生("队列")之间的差异。我们将这门课程设计为实验性试点课程,采用讲座、实验和实践活动相结合的方式,研究混合教学是否一定会使一组学生(如面授学生)比另一组学生(如在线学生)更有优势。我们特别想知道,是否可以通过课程设计的选择和互动学习活动的使用来减少差异。我们发现,我们的设计为学生带来了普遍非常积极的体验--在线学习和面对面学习的学生在情感体验上没有差异。我们确实发现,在参与度和同伴评价方面存在一些微小的差异,这对面对面学习的学生有利,但在总体学业成绩方面没有差异。我们的结论是,本案例研究表明,如果课程和教学大纲设计得当,某些形式的混合学习并不一定对在线学生不利。我们还为寻求调整、复制或扩展我们的方法的教育工作者提供了范例和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the hybrid classroom in economics: A case study

In this paper, we discuss the differences between online and in-person students (“cohorts”) in an intermediate econometrics course taught in Summer 2021 using a hybrid (online and in-person) educational format. We designed this course as an experimental pilot which used a combination of lectures, labs, and hands-on activities to study whether hybrid instruction necessarily advantages one group of students (e.g., in-person) over another (e.g., online). We were particularly interested to know if differences could be reduced through course design choices and the use of interactive learning activities. We found that our design led to generally highly positive experiences for students – and there were no differences in affective experiences between the online and in-person cohorts. We did find some small differences in participation and peer-evaluation, favouring in-person students, but no differences in overall academic achievement. We conclude that this case study shows how certain forms of hybrid learning do not necessarily disadvantage online students, if properly supported with course and curriculum design. We also provide examples and guidance for educators seeking to adapt, replicate, or extend our approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring economic graph competence Turn the camera on to get better grade: Evidence from a field experiment Environmental economics in the wild: Using long-form journalism and other mass media in the classroom Investigating the link between students’ learning intentions and their learning outcomes: A clustered randomised controlled trial A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1