教育 4.0 中的性别数字鸿沟:关于包容性因素和战略的系统性文献综述

Iris Cristina Peláez-Sánchez, Carlos Enrique George Reyes, Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales
{"title":"教育 4.0 中的性别数字鸿沟:关于包容性因素和战略的系统性文献综述","authors":"Iris Cristina Peláez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Carlos Enrique George Reyes,&nbsp;Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales","doi":"10.1002/fer3.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The gender digital divide (GDD) is a phenomenon that refers to the inequalities and differences between men and women in accessing the digital ecosystem in various environments, such as the scenarios of Education 4.0. Bridging the GDD in access, use, and appropriation of technologies would promote the digital inclusion in spaces traditionally dominated by men. A systematic literature review was conducted using seven databases, considering Scopus and Web of Science. Through this, the factors with the most significant impact on the widening of this type of gap were identified. The findings suggest that the elements that limit the GDD are (a) access and use of technologies, (b) social barriers, and (c) gender stereotypes and roles. On the other hand, factors that need to be considered for the digital inclusion of women were identified as follows: (a) the mode of interaction with technologies, (b) digital competencies in Education 4.0, (c) the mode of technology-mediated teaching and learning, (d) digital competencies in the workplace, and (e) digital participation. It is concluded that more digital inclusion strategies are needed to reduce the GDD, thus requiring greater participation from society and universities to achieve digital equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":100564,"journal":{"name":"Future in Educational Research","volume":"1 2","pages":"129-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fer3.16","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender digital divide in education 4.0: A systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Iris Cristina Peláez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Carlos Enrique George Reyes,&nbsp;Leonardo David Glasserman-Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fer3.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The gender digital divide (GDD) is a phenomenon that refers to the inequalities and differences between men and women in accessing the digital ecosystem in various environments, such as the scenarios of Education 4.0. Bridging the GDD in access, use, and appropriation of technologies would promote the digital inclusion in spaces traditionally dominated by men. A systematic literature review was conducted using seven databases, considering Scopus and Web of Science. Through this, the factors with the most significant impact on the widening of this type of gap were identified. The findings suggest that the elements that limit the GDD are (a) access and use of technologies, (b) social barriers, and (c) gender stereotypes and roles. On the other hand, factors that need to be considered for the digital inclusion of women were identified as follows: (a) the mode of interaction with technologies, (b) digital competencies in Education 4.0, (c) the mode of technology-mediated teaching and learning, (d) digital competencies in the workplace, and (e) digital participation. It is concluded that more digital inclusion strategies are needed to reduce the GDD, thus requiring greater participation from society and universities to achieve digital equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future in Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"129-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fer3.16\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future in Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fer3.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fer3.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别数字鸿沟(GDD)是一种现象,指的是在各种环境中,例如在教育 4.0 的情景中,男女在使用数字生态系统方面的不平等和差异。弥合技术获取、使用和占有方面的性别数字鸿沟将促进传统上由男性主导的空间的数字包容。我们利用 Scopus 和 Web of Science 等七个数据库进行了系统的文献综述。通过这项工作,确定了对此类差距扩大影响最大的因素。研究结果表明,限制性别与发展差距的因素有:(a) 获取和使用技术,(b) 社会障碍,(c) 性别陈规定型观念和角色。另一方面,确定了妇女融入数字世界需要考虑的以下因素:(a) 与技术互动的模式,(b) 教育 4.0 中的数字能力,(c) 以技术为媒介的教学模式,(d) 工作场所的数字能力,以及 (e) 数字参与。结论是,需要更多的数字包容战略来减少全球数字失踪人数,因此需要社会和大学的更多参与,以实现数字公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender digital divide in education 4.0: A systematic literature review of factors and strategies for inclusion

The gender digital divide (GDD) is a phenomenon that refers to the inequalities and differences between men and women in accessing the digital ecosystem in various environments, such as the scenarios of Education 4.0. Bridging the GDD in access, use, and appropriation of technologies would promote the digital inclusion in spaces traditionally dominated by men. A systematic literature review was conducted using seven databases, considering Scopus and Web of Science. Through this, the factors with the most significant impact on the widening of this type of gap were identified. The findings suggest that the elements that limit the GDD are (a) access and use of technologies, (b) social barriers, and (c) gender stereotypes and roles. On the other hand, factors that need to be considered for the digital inclusion of women were identified as follows: (a) the mode of interaction with technologies, (b) digital competencies in Education 4.0, (c) the mode of technology-mediated teaching and learning, (d) digital competencies in the workplace, and (e) digital participation. It is concluded that more digital inclusion strategies are needed to reduce the GDD, thus requiring greater participation from society and universities to achieve digital equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring the relationship between learning emotion and cognitive behaviors in a digital game Enhancing university students' learning performance in a metaverse-enabled immersive learning environment for STEM education: A community of inquiry approach Multidimensional challenges of internationalization among universities in Southeast Asia: A scoping review of empirical evidence Correction to Future in Educational Research articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1