正中靶心:用开放式和封闭式直接问题准确衡量创新的支付意愿

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Research in Marketing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.12.003
Jonas Schmidt , Michael Steiner , Manfred Krafft , Nadine Eckel , Darren W. Dahl
{"title":"正中靶心:用开放式和封闭式直接问题准确衡量创新的支付意愿","authors":"Jonas Schmidt ,&nbsp;Michael Steiner ,&nbsp;Manfred Krafft ,&nbsp;Nadine Eckel ,&nbsp;Darren W. Dahl","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Knowledge of a customer’s willingness to pay (WTP) at early stages of product development is key to the success of innovations. However, since innovative products do not exist yet, only the hypothetical WTP can be surveyed, inducing a measurement bias. Unfortunately, little is known about the factors that induce this bias and how it differs depending on the method utilized in measuring WTP. We address this gap by focusing on direct methods to survey hypothetical WTP. Based on anchoring theory and the corresponding psychological mechanisms for open questions as well as closed questions, we conducted two experiments, each comprised of a survey and a field study. The experiments differ regarding the product category and the product’s degree of innovativeness. Our results show that open questions are less accurate in estimating real WTP than closed questions. Further, our research offers insights into moderating factors that influence the efficacy of open and closed questions. For example, for customers with a very high product category knowledge, open questions are applicable, while closed questions result in higher accuracy when accounting for the customers’ cognitive abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 383-402"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016781162300085X/pdfft?md5=48a96b2913080b49b24b49b2ad89cb7a&pid=1-s2.0-S016781162300085X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hitting the bullseye: Accurately measuring willingness to pay for innovations with open and closed direct questions\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Schmidt ,&nbsp;Michael Steiner ,&nbsp;Manfred Krafft ,&nbsp;Nadine Eckel ,&nbsp;Darren W. Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Knowledge of a customer’s willingness to pay (WTP) at early stages of product development is key to the success of innovations. However, since innovative products do not exist yet, only the hypothetical WTP can be surveyed, inducing a measurement bias. Unfortunately, little is known about the factors that induce this bias and how it differs depending on the method utilized in measuring WTP. We address this gap by focusing on direct methods to survey hypothetical WTP. Based on anchoring theory and the corresponding psychological mechanisms for open questions as well as closed questions, we conducted two experiments, each comprised of a survey and a field study. The experiments differ regarding the product category and the product’s degree of innovativeness. Our results show that open questions are less accurate in estimating real WTP than closed questions. Further, our research offers insights into moderating factors that influence the efficacy of open and closed questions. For example, for customers with a very high product category knowledge, open questions are applicable, while closed questions result in higher accuracy when accounting for the customers’ cognitive abilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 383-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016781162300085X/pdfft?md5=48a96b2913080b49b24b49b2ad89cb7a&pid=1-s2.0-S016781162300085X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016781162300085X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016781162300085X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在产品开发的早期阶段了解客户的支付意愿(WTP)是创新成功的关键。然而,由于创新产品尚不存在,因此只能对假设的 WTP 进行调查,从而产生测量偏差。遗憾的是,人们对导致这种偏差的因素以及偏差因测量 WTP 所用方法的不同而产生的差异知之甚少。为了弥补这一不足,我们重点研究了调查假设 WTP 的直接方法。基于锚定理论以及开放式问题和封闭式问题的相应心理机制,我们进行了两项实验,每项实验都包括一项调查和一项实地研究。实验的产品类别和产品的创新程度各不相同。我们的结果表明,开放式问题在估算真实 WTP 方面不如封闭式问题准确。此外,我们的研究还对影响开放式问题和封闭式问题效果的调节因素提出了见解。例如,对于产品类别知识非常丰富的客户,开放式问题是适用的,而考虑到客户的认知能力,封闭式问题的准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hitting the bullseye: Accurately measuring willingness to pay for innovations with open and closed direct questions

Knowledge of a customer’s willingness to pay (WTP) at early stages of product development is key to the success of innovations. However, since innovative products do not exist yet, only the hypothetical WTP can be surveyed, inducing a measurement bias. Unfortunately, little is known about the factors that induce this bias and how it differs depending on the method utilized in measuring WTP. We address this gap by focusing on direct methods to survey hypothetical WTP. Based on anchoring theory and the corresponding psychological mechanisms for open questions as well as closed questions, we conducted two experiments, each comprised of a survey and a field study. The experiments differ regarding the product category and the product’s degree of innovativeness. Our results show that open questions are less accurate in estimating real WTP than closed questions. Further, our research offers insights into moderating factors that influence the efficacy of open and closed questions. For example, for customers with a very high product category knowledge, open questions are applicable, while closed questions result in higher accuracy when accounting for the customers’ cognitive abilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels Editorial Board Strange Case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer Preference Inconsistencies in Costly Price Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1