压力和无压力时期的商品期货市场:量子关联方法的进一步启示

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.005
Amal Abricha , Amine Ben Amar , Makram Bellalah
{"title":"压力和无压力时期的商品期货市场:量子关联方法的进一步启示","authors":"Amal Abricha ,&nbsp;Amine Ben Amar ,&nbsp;Makram Bellalah","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most of the academic literature on connectedness focuses on stock markets and commodity spot markets. However, there is still much to say about the connectedness among commodity futures markets at different expiration dates, as this part of the literature is as yet small and inconclusive. This paper builds on the existing literature by focusing on connectedness among a set of ten commodity futures markets (including energy, agriculture, and metal sectors) at different maturities, the global equity market and three different sources of uncertainty (financial, economic, and geopolitical) over the period 2000–2022. In doing so, we estimate a combination of complementary connectedness metrics based on the work of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), which enables measuring average, and the works of Chatziantoniou et al. (2021) and Ando et al. (2022) which enable measuring connectedness under different market circumstances (i.e., low, median and high quantiles). The analysis provides evidence of the variable aspect of connectedness across commodities and uncertainty measures assessed across different quantiles. The average directional connectedness network suggests that commodity futures markets within the same category are significantly sensitive to each-other. However, interdependencies between commodities belonging to different categories are relatively lower. The average total connectedness across quantiles provides evidence of (i) a clear symmetric pattern at the extreme lower and upper quantiles, and (ii) an increase in connectedness with the magnitude of extreme negative and positive shocks. The time-varying analysis indicates that connectedness increases at all quantiles during periods of high market stress, but with relatively higher intensity at the lower quantiles. Additionally, the structure and magnitude of connectedness at the extremes – upper and lower quantiles – differs from the pattern of connectedness at the median quantiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commodity futures markets under stress and stress-free periods: Further insights from a quantile connectedness approach\",\"authors\":\"Amal Abricha ,&nbsp;Amine Ben Amar ,&nbsp;Makram Bellalah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most of the academic literature on connectedness focuses on stock markets and commodity spot markets. However, there is still much to say about the connectedness among commodity futures markets at different expiration dates, as this part of the literature is as yet small and inconclusive. This paper builds on the existing literature by focusing on connectedness among a set of ten commodity futures markets (including energy, agriculture, and metal sectors) at different maturities, the global equity market and three different sources of uncertainty (financial, economic, and geopolitical) over the period 2000–2022. In doing so, we estimate a combination of complementary connectedness metrics based on the work of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), which enables measuring average, and the works of Chatziantoniou et al. (2021) and Ando et al. (2022) which enable measuring connectedness under different market circumstances (i.e., low, median and high quantiles). The analysis provides evidence of the variable aspect of connectedness across commodities and uncertainty measures assessed across different quantiles. The average directional connectedness network suggests that commodity futures markets within the same category are significantly sensitive to each-other. However, interdependencies between commodities belonging to different categories are relatively lower. The average total connectedness across quantiles provides evidence of (i) a clear symmetric pattern at the extreme lower and upper quantiles, and (ii) an increase in connectedness with the magnitude of extreme negative and positive shocks. The time-varying analysis indicates that connectedness increases at all quantiles during periods of high market stress, but with relatively higher intensity at the lower quantiles. Additionally, the structure and magnitude of connectedness at the extremes – upper and lower quantiles – differs from the pattern of connectedness at the median quantiles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976923001394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976923001394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于关联性的学术文献大多集中于股票市场和商品现货市场。然而,关于不同到期日的商品期货市场之间的关联性仍有很多值得探讨的地方,因为这部分文献目前还很少,也没有定论。本文在现有文献的基础上,重点研究了 2000-2022 年间不同到期日的十个商品期货市场(包括能源、农业和金属行业)、全球股票市场和三种不同的不确定性来源(金融、经济和地缘政治)之间的关联性。在此过程中,我们根据 Diebold 和 Yilmaz(2012 年)的研究成果以及 Chatziantoniou 等人(2021 年)和 Ando 等人(2022 年)的研究成果,对互补的连通性指标组合进行了估算,前者可以测量平均值,后者可以测量不同市场环境下(即低、中和高量级)的连通性。分析表明,在不同数量级评估的商品和不确定性度量中,连通性具有可变性。平均方向关联度网络表明,同一类别的商品期货市场对彼此有明显的敏感性。然而,属于不同类别的商品之间的相互依赖性相对较低。不同量化值之间的平均总连通性表明:(i) 在极端的下量化值和上量化值之间存在明显的对称模式;(ii) 随着极端的负冲击和正冲击幅度的增加,连通性也在增加。时变分析表明,在市场高度紧张时期,所有量级的关联度都会增加,但较低量级的关联度相对较高。此外,极端量级(上量级和下量级)的连通性结构和规模与中位量级的连通性模式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commodity futures markets under stress and stress-free periods: Further insights from a quantile connectedness approach

Most of the academic literature on connectedness focuses on stock markets and commodity spot markets. However, there is still much to say about the connectedness among commodity futures markets at different expiration dates, as this part of the literature is as yet small and inconclusive. This paper builds on the existing literature by focusing on connectedness among a set of ten commodity futures markets (including energy, agriculture, and metal sectors) at different maturities, the global equity market and three different sources of uncertainty (financial, economic, and geopolitical) over the period 2000–2022. In doing so, we estimate a combination of complementary connectedness metrics based on the work of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012), which enables measuring average, and the works of Chatziantoniou et al. (2021) and Ando et al. (2022) which enable measuring connectedness under different market circumstances (i.e., low, median and high quantiles). The analysis provides evidence of the variable aspect of connectedness across commodities and uncertainty measures assessed across different quantiles. The average directional connectedness network suggests that commodity futures markets within the same category are significantly sensitive to each-other. However, interdependencies between commodities belonging to different categories are relatively lower. The average total connectedness across quantiles provides evidence of (i) a clear symmetric pattern at the extreme lower and upper quantiles, and (ii) an increase in connectedness with the magnitude of extreme negative and positive shocks. The time-varying analysis indicates that connectedness increases at all quantiles during periods of high market stress, but with relatively higher intensity at the lower quantiles. Additionally, the structure and magnitude of connectedness at the extremes – upper and lower quantiles – differs from the pattern of connectedness at the median quantiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Monetary policy through the risk-taking channel: Evidence from an emerging market Bank insolvency risk, Z-score measures and unimodal returns: A refinement Can corporate social performance mitigate the risk of extreme stock returns? Are public debt and public debt expectations associated with debt management strategies? Time-frequency co-movement and cross-quantile connectedness of exchange rates: Evidence from ASEAN+3 Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1