比较用传统方法和使用信息与传播技术解决化学计算问题的速度。

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Chimica Slovenica Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.17344/acsi.2023.8485
Brina Dojer, Andrej Šorgo, Matjaž Kristl
{"title":"比较用传统方法和使用信息与传播技术解决化学计算问题的速度。","authors":"Brina Dojer, Andrej Šorgo, Matjaž Kristl","doi":"10.17344/acsi.2023.8485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficiency of time use is a key factor in chemistry calculation tasks, affecting both, personal and professional domains. This study is dedicated to finding the fastest methods for accomplishing chemistry tasks. Our investigation delves into the comparative temporal outlays made by students as they engage three different approaches: using an electronic calculator, a basic calculator app on a smartphone, and a desktop computer calculator. As part of our research, we examine a cohort of 52 Slovenian university students, preservice teachers who were actively enrolled in chemistry and related science programs, spanning the academic years of 2019 and 2022.  The results from 2019 show that students can solve the chemistry tasks most quickly using electronic calculator and take the most time to calculate the tasks using smartphones (Δmean = 133 s; ΔSD = 5 s; Δmin = 97 s; Δmax = 131 s). An even larger difference is observed from the 2022 study year (Δmean = 189 s; ΔSD = 129 s; Δmin = 170 s; Δmax = 625 s). In summary, although smartphones are recognised as a multitasking device, replacing traditional single-purpose devices, they have not been able to outperform them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7122,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chimica Slovenica","volume":"70 4","pages":"690-698"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of the speed of solving chemistry calculation tasks in the traditional way and with the use of ICT.\",\"authors\":\"Brina Dojer, Andrej Šorgo, Matjaž Kristl\",\"doi\":\"10.17344/acsi.2023.8485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Efficiency of time use is a key factor in chemistry calculation tasks, affecting both, personal and professional domains. This study is dedicated to finding the fastest methods for accomplishing chemistry tasks. Our investigation delves into the comparative temporal outlays made by students as they engage three different approaches: using an electronic calculator, a basic calculator app on a smartphone, and a desktop computer calculator. As part of our research, we examine a cohort of 52 Slovenian university students, preservice teachers who were actively enrolled in chemistry and related science programs, spanning the academic years of 2019 and 2022.  The results from 2019 show that students can solve the chemistry tasks most quickly using electronic calculator and take the most time to calculate the tasks using smartphones (Δmean = 133 s; ΔSD = 5 s; Δmin = 97 s; Δmax = 131 s). An even larger difference is observed from the 2022 study year (Δmean = 189 s; ΔSD = 129 s; Δmin = 170 s; Δmax = 625 s). In summary, although smartphones are recognised as a multitasking device, replacing traditional single-purpose devices, they have not been able to outperform them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Chimica Slovenica\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"690-698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Chimica Slovenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2023.8485\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chimica Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2023.8485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时间利用效率是化学计算任务中的一个关键因素,对个人和专业领域都有影响。本研究致力于寻找完成化学任务的最快方法。我们的研究深入探讨了学生在使用电子计算器、智能手机上的基本计算器应用程序和台式电脑计算器这三种不同方法时所耗费时间的比较。作为研究的一部分,我们对斯洛文尼亚的 52 名大学生进行了研究,他们都是积极参加化学和相关科学课程的职前教师,时间跨度为 2019 和 2022 学年。 2019 学年的结果表明,学生使用电子计算器能最快速地完成化学任务,而使用智能手机计算任务花费的时间最多(Δmean = 133 s; ΔSD = 5 s; Δmin = 97 s; Δmax = 131 s)。2022 研究年度的差异更大(Δmean = 189 s; ΔSD = 129 s; Δmin = 170 s; Δmax = 625 s)。总之,尽管智能手机被认为是一种多任务设备,可以取代传统的单用途设备,但其性能却无法超越传统设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The comparison of the speed of solving chemistry calculation tasks in the traditional way and with the use of ICT.

Efficiency of time use is a key factor in chemistry calculation tasks, affecting both, personal and professional domains. This study is dedicated to finding the fastest methods for accomplishing chemistry tasks. Our investigation delves into the comparative temporal outlays made by students as they engage three different approaches: using an electronic calculator, a basic calculator app on a smartphone, and a desktop computer calculator. As part of our research, we examine a cohort of 52 Slovenian university students, preservice teachers who were actively enrolled in chemistry and related science programs, spanning the academic years of 2019 and 2022.  The results from 2019 show that students can solve the chemistry tasks most quickly using electronic calculator and take the most time to calculate the tasks using smartphones (Δmean = 133 s; ΔSD = 5 s; Δmin = 97 s; Δmax = 131 s). An even larger difference is observed from the 2022 study year (Δmean = 189 s; ΔSD = 129 s; Δmin = 170 s; Δmax = 625 s). In summary, although smartphones are recognised as a multitasking device, replacing traditional single-purpose devices, they have not been able to outperform them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Chimica Slovenica
Acta Chimica Slovenica 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Is an international, peer-reviewed and Open Access journal. It provides a forum for the publication of original scientific research in all fields of chemistry and closely related areas. Reviews, feature, scientific and technical articles, and short communications are welcome.
期刊最新文献
DRUŠTVENE VESTI IN DRUGE AKTIVNOSTI SOCIETY NEWS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, ACTIVITIES. Synthesis of (E)-3-{[2-oxo-5-arylfuran-3(2H)-ylidene]methyl}-4H-1-benzopyran-4-ones, crystal structure, quantum chemical substantiation. Extraction System for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Tungsten(VI) with 4-Nitrocatechol and Benzalkonium Chloride. Synthetic Optimization and Antibacterial Activity of Novel Benzodioxepine-Biphenyl Amide Derivatives. Development of eutectics of pioglitazone with citric acid and its effect on crystallite properties and dissolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1