Thiago Guedes Pinto, Daniel Vitor de Souza, Glenda Nicioli da Silva, Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori, Manoela Domingues Martins, Daniel Araki Ribeiro
{"title":"彗星试验作为体内口腔癌发生的合适生物标志物:系统综述。","authors":"Thiago Guedes Pinto, Daniel Vitor de Souza, Glenda Nicioli da Silva, Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori, Manoela Domingues Martins, Daniel Araki Ribeiro","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2023.2298182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In order to detect genetic damage, different methods have been developed, such as micronuclei and comet assay. The comet assay presents some advantages when compared to the other aforementioned methods, including wide versatility, as any eukaryotic cell can be evaluated at an individual cellular level. In this context, the aim of this systematic review was designed to help further elucidate the following question: is the comet assay a suitable biomarker of <i>in vivo</i> oral carcinogenesis?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The present systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full manuscripts from 18 studies were carefully selected in this setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies demonstrated positive findings for genotoxicity in peripheral blood or oral cells in patients with pre-malignant lesions or oral cancer. In the quality assessment of studies, 1 was classified as Strong, 5 were considered as Moderate, and 12 were classified as Weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, the comet assay can be a useful biomarker for oral carcinogenesis. However, further studies with more strict parameters are suggested (with less uncontrolled confounders) in order to increase findings reliability for diagnosis of oral potentially malignant lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"692-702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comet assay as a suitable biomarker for <i>in vivo</i> oral carcinogenesis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Guedes Pinto, Daniel Vitor de Souza, Glenda Nicioli da Silva, Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori, Manoela Domingues Martins, Daniel Araki Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1354750X.2023.2298182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In order to detect genetic damage, different methods have been developed, such as micronuclei and comet assay. The comet assay presents some advantages when compared to the other aforementioned methods, including wide versatility, as any eukaryotic cell can be evaluated at an individual cellular level. In this context, the aim of this systematic review was designed to help further elucidate the following question: is the comet assay a suitable biomarker of <i>in vivo</i> oral carcinogenesis?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The present systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full manuscripts from 18 studies were carefully selected in this setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies demonstrated positive findings for genotoxicity in peripheral blood or oral cells in patients with pre-malignant lesions or oral cancer. In the quality assessment of studies, 1 was classified as Strong, 5 were considered as Moderate, and 12 were classified as Weak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, the comet assay can be a useful biomarker for oral carcinogenesis. However, further studies with more strict parameters are suggested (with less uncontrolled confounders) in order to increase findings reliability for diagnosis of oral potentially malignant lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"692-702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2023.2298182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2023.2298182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:为了检测基因损伤,人们开发了不同的方法,如微核检测和彗星检测。与上述其他方法相比,彗星试验具有一些优势,包括用途广泛,可在单个细胞水平上对任何真核细胞进行评估。在此背景下,本系统综述旨在帮助进一步阐明以下问题:彗星试验是否是体内口腔癌发生的合适生物标志物? 材料与方法:本系统综述根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南进行。在此背景下,对 18 项研究的完整手稿进行了仔细筛选:结果:共有 15 项研究显示,恶性肿瘤前病变或口腔癌患者外周血或口腔细胞中的基因毒性结果呈阳性。在对研究进行质量评估时,1 项研究被评为 "强",5 项研究被评为 "中",12 项研究被评为 "弱":总之,彗星试验可以作为口腔癌发生的有用生物标志物。结论:总之,彗星测定是口腔癌发生的有用生物标志物,但建议进一步研究更严格的参数(减少未控制的混杂因素),以提高结果对诊断口腔潜在恶性病变的可靠性。
Comet assay as a suitable biomarker for in vivo oral carcinogenesis: a systematic review.
Background and objectives: In order to detect genetic damage, different methods have been developed, such as micronuclei and comet assay. The comet assay presents some advantages when compared to the other aforementioned methods, including wide versatility, as any eukaryotic cell can be evaluated at an individual cellular level. In this context, the aim of this systematic review was designed to help further elucidate the following question: is the comet assay a suitable biomarker of in vivo oral carcinogenesis?
Material and methods: The present systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full manuscripts from 18 studies were carefully selected in this setting.
Results: A total of 15 studies demonstrated positive findings for genotoxicity in peripheral blood or oral cells in patients with pre-malignant lesions or oral cancer. In the quality assessment of studies, 1 was classified as Strong, 5 were considered as Moderate, and 12 were classified as Weak.
Conclusion: In summary, the comet assay can be a useful biomarker for oral carcinogenesis. However, further studies with more strict parameters are suggested (with less uncontrolled confounders) in order to increase findings reliability for diagnosis of oral potentially malignant lesions.
期刊介绍:
The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source.
Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged:
• Biomarkers of disease
• Biomarkers of exposure
• Biomarkers of response
• Biomarkers of susceptibility
Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.