对带回家的纳洛酮的获取、体验和态度:在线调查。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s10900-023-01321-6
Lara Schwieger, Joseph Edward Carpenter, Tim P Moran, Fire Erowid, Matthew Cornelison, Dabney Evans, Brent Morgan, Brian Patrick Murray
{"title":"对带回家的纳洛酮的获取、体验和态度:在线调查。","authors":"Lara Schwieger, Joseph Edward Carpenter, Tim P Moran, Fire Erowid, Matthew Cornelison, Dabney Evans, Brent Morgan, Brian Patrick Murray","doi":"10.1007/s10900-023-01321-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The opioid public health crisis continues to burden individuals, communities, and economies. Public health opinion has emphasized the need for increased access to harm reduction services, but there is a dearth of information on the views and experiences of people who use opioids. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of naloxone use, attitudes, and experiences with naloxone among an online community of people who use drugs. We performed a cross-sectional survey looking at experiences with and attitudes towards take-home naloxone. Data is presented descriptively, with analysis of the differences between people who do and do not use opioids using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Fisher's exact tests. There were 1,143 respondents, of whom 70% were from the United States. Only 38% of participants who use opioids had received naloxone training, but 56% of these individuals said that they felt comfortable using a naloxone kit. Nearly all respondents (95%) said they would be willing to use naloxone on someone who had overdosed and approximately 90% would want naloxone used on them in case of an overdose. Regarding harm reduction, 24% of respondents said they had access to safe use programs, and 33% said they had access to clean needle exchange programs. A majority of the participants who use opioids were in favor of having naloxone with them when using drugs and believed naloxone should be freely available. This study demonstrates the receptiveness of take-home naloxone and highlights the need for better implementation of naloxone within communities that use opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to, Experience with, and Attitudes towards Take Home Naloxone: An Online Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Schwieger, Joseph Edward Carpenter, Tim P Moran, Fire Erowid, Matthew Cornelison, Dabney Evans, Brent Morgan, Brian Patrick Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10900-023-01321-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The opioid public health crisis continues to burden individuals, communities, and economies. Public health opinion has emphasized the need for increased access to harm reduction services, but there is a dearth of information on the views and experiences of people who use opioids. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of naloxone use, attitudes, and experiences with naloxone among an online community of people who use drugs. We performed a cross-sectional survey looking at experiences with and attitudes towards take-home naloxone. Data is presented descriptively, with analysis of the differences between people who do and do not use opioids using the χ<sup>2</sup> and Fisher's exact tests. There were 1,143 respondents, of whom 70% were from the United States. Only 38% of participants who use opioids had received naloxone training, but 56% of these individuals said that they felt comfortable using a naloxone kit. Nearly all respondents (95%) said they would be willing to use naloxone on someone who had overdosed and approximately 90% would want naloxone used on them in case of an overdose. Regarding harm reduction, 24% of respondents said they had access to safe use programs, and 33% said they had access to clean needle exchange programs. A majority of the participants who use opioids were in favor of having naloxone with them when using drugs and believed naloxone should be freely available. This study demonstrates the receptiveness of take-home naloxone and highlights the need for better implementation of naloxone within communities that use opioids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-023-01321-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-023-01321-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物公共卫生危机继续给个人、社区和经济造成负担。公共卫生舆论强调需要增加获得减低伤害服务的机会,但有关阿片类药物使用者的观点和经历的信息却十分匮乏。我们的研究旨在调查吸毒者在线社区中纳洛酮的使用率、态度以及使用纳洛酮的经验。我们进行了一项横断面调查,以了解人们使用带回家的纳洛酮的经历和态度。数据以描述性方式呈现,并使用 χ2 和费雪精确检验分析了使用和不使用阿片类药物人群之间的差异。共有 1,143 名受访者,其中 70% 来自美国。在使用阿片类药物的参与者中,只有 38% 的人接受过纳洛酮培训,但其中 56% 的人表示,他们对使用纳洛酮试剂盒感到得心应手。几乎所有受访者(95%)都表示,他们愿意对用药过量的人使用纳洛酮,约 90% 的受访者希望在用药过量时对他们使用纳洛酮。关于减少伤害,24% 的受访者表示他们可以参加安全使用计划,33% 的受访者表示他们可以参加清洁针头交换计划。大多数使用阿片类药物的参与者都赞成在吸毒时随身携带纳洛酮,并认为纳洛酮应该免费提供。这项研究表明,纳洛酮可以随身携带,并强调了在使用阿片类药物的社区中更好地使用纳洛酮的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to, Experience with, and Attitudes towards Take Home Naloxone: An Online Survey.

The opioid public health crisis continues to burden individuals, communities, and economies. Public health opinion has emphasized the need for increased access to harm reduction services, but there is a dearth of information on the views and experiences of people who use opioids. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence of naloxone use, attitudes, and experiences with naloxone among an online community of people who use drugs. We performed a cross-sectional survey looking at experiences with and attitudes towards take-home naloxone. Data is presented descriptively, with analysis of the differences between people who do and do not use opioids using the χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. There were 1,143 respondents, of whom 70% were from the United States. Only 38% of participants who use opioids had received naloxone training, but 56% of these individuals said that they felt comfortable using a naloxone kit. Nearly all respondents (95%) said they would be willing to use naloxone on someone who had overdosed and approximately 90% would want naloxone used on them in case of an overdose. Regarding harm reduction, 24% of respondents said they had access to safe use programs, and 33% said they had access to clean needle exchange programs. A majority of the participants who use opioids were in favor of having naloxone with them when using drugs and believed naloxone should be freely available. This study demonstrates the receptiveness of take-home naloxone and highlights the need for better implementation of naloxone within communities that use opioids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatrists' Perceptions of the Role of Journalists in Suicide Reporting and Prejudices about Mental Illnesses in Portugal. The Association of Sexual Minority Status with the Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Depression among NYC Adults. Association of National Identity and Trust in Government with COVID-19 Vaccination and Brand Choice in Taiwan. The Influence of the COVID 19 Pandemic on Food Insecurity Among Cancer Survivors Across New York State. Zika Virus Infection Knowledge and Communication Preferences Among Women of Reproductive Age in Central Brooklyn, New York: A Thematic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1