POM-Checker 用于测量健康参与者肩关节活动范围的有效性和可靠性:单中心试点对比研究

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.3390/mps6060114
Hongmin Chu, Weonjin Kim, Seongsu Joo, Eunsik Park, Yeong Won Kim, Cheol-Hyun Kim, Sangkwan Lee
{"title":"POM-Checker 用于测量健康参与者肩关节活动范围的有效性和可靠性:单中心试点对比研究","authors":"Hongmin Chu, Weonjin Kim, Seongsu Joo, Eunsik Park, Yeong Won Kim, Cheol-Hyun Kim, Sangkwan Lee","doi":"10.3390/mps6060114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare shoulder movement measurements between a Kinect-based markerless ROM assessment device (POM-Checker) and a 3D motion capture analysis system (BTS SMART DX-400).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-visit clinical trial designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the POM-Checker. The primary outcome was to assess the equivalence between two measurement devices within the same set of participants, aiming to evaluate the validity of the POM-Checker compared to the gold standard device (3D Motion Analysis System). As this was a pilot study, six participants were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the reproducibility of the measurements. Among the 18 movements analyzed, 16 exhibited ICC values of >0.75, indicating excellent reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that the POM-checker is reliable and validated to measure the range of motion of the shoulder joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10745328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of POM-Checker for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Healthy Participants: A Pilot Single-Center Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hongmin Chu, Weonjin Kim, Seongsu Joo, Eunsik Park, Yeong Won Kim, Cheol-Hyun Kim, Sangkwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/mps6060114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare shoulder movement measurements between a Kinect-based markerless ROM assessment device (POM-Checker) and a 3D motion capture analysis system (BTS SMART DX-400).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-visit clinical trial designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the POM-Checker. The primary outcome was to assess the equivalence between two measurement devices within the same set of participants, aiming to evaluate the validity of the POM-Checker compared to the gold standard device (3D Motion Analysis System). As this was a pilot study, six participants were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the reproducibility of the measurements. Among the 18 movements analyzed, 16 exhibited ICC values of >0.75, indicating excellent reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that the POM-checker is reliable and validated to measure the range of motion of the shoulder joint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10745328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6060114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6060114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在比较基于 Kinect 的无标记 ROM 评估设备(POM-Checker)和三维运动捕捉分析系统(BTS SMART DX-400)的肩关节运动测量结果:这是一项单次临床试验,旨在评估POM-Checker的有效性和可靠性。主要结果是评估在同一组参与者中两种测量设备之间的等效性,目的是评估 POM-Checker 与黄金标准设备(三维运动分析系统)相比的有效性。由于这是一项试验性研究,共有六名参与者参加:采用类内相关系数(ICC)和相应的 95% 置信区间(CI)来评估测量结果的可重复性。在分析的 18 个动作中,有 16 个动作的 ICC 值大于 0.75,表明重现性极佳:结果表明,POM-检查器在测量肩关节活动范围方面是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and Reliability of POM-Checker for Measuring Shoulder Range of Motion in Healthy Participants: A Pilot Single-Center Comparative Study.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare shoulder movement measurements between a Kinect-based markerless ROM assessment device (POM-Checker) and a 3D motion capture analysis system (BTS SMART DX-400).

Methods: This was a single-visit clinical trial designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the POM-Checker. The primary outcome was to assess the equivalence between two measurement devices within the same set of participants, aiming to evaluate the validity of the POM-Checker compared to the gold standard device (3D Motion Analysis System). As this was a pilot study, six participants were included.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the reproducibility of the measurements. Among the 18 movements analyzed, 16 exhibited ICC values of >0.75, indicating excellent reproducibility.

Conclusion: The results showed that the POM-checker is reliable and validated to measure the range of motion of the shoulder joint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parasitological Examination of the Digestive System of Wild Boar from a Practical Point of View-Endoparasitological Sampling under Field Conditions. Full Validation and Application to Clinical Research of a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Assessment of Urinary 3-Indoxyl Sulfate in Pediatric Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. A Mathematical Model of Pressure Ulcer Formation to Facilitate Prevention and Management. Evaluation of an Italian Population-Based Programme for Risk Assessment and Genetic Counselling and Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer after 10 Years of Operation: An Observational Study Protocol. The Sri Lanka Mother and Newborn Growth (S-MaNGro) Cohort: Protocol of a Nationwide Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1