团队学习的影响:学生和教师促进者的比较研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Education for Health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-22 DOI:10.4103/efh.efh_191_23
Risa Iida, Mai Tanaka, Minami Torigoe, Sakiko Inaba, Noriaki Wakana, Kazuhiro Homma, Naoto Fukuyama
{"title":"团队学习的影响:学生和教师促进者的比较研究。","authors":"Risa Iida, Mai Tanaka, Minami Torigoe, Sakiko Inaba, Noriaki Wakana, Kazuhiro Homma, Naoto Fukuyama","doi":"10.4103/efh.efh_191_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) refers to the application of an active-learning method that has gained popularity across all health-care disciplines. This study aimed to assess nutrition students' perceptions of the roles of student versus faculty facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the study included, 117 2nd-year nutrition students registered in the \"Introduction to Medicine\" course in the 2022 academic year at a Japanese university. The first TBL session was faculty-led, whereas three students served as facilitators in the second. Upon completion of the course, learners and student facilitators completed a questionnaire on the student-led TBL. Responses to close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and those to open-ended questions were categorized into common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 learners and 3 student facilitators responded to the questions. Learners found student-led TBL to be just as or more effective than faculty-led TBL in three respects: comprehension (93.0%), active participation (96.5%), and expectation of academic performance improvement (93.9%). According to student facilitators, it improved their knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and leadership abilities. Learners and facilitators indicated that student-led TBL was significantly more effective than faculty-led TBL. Thus, student-led TBL can enhance the ability of all students at different academic levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Student-led TBL appears to be an effective learning strategy in higher education and further shifts toward student-centered learning in the course curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team-based Learning Impact: A Comparative Study of Student and Faculty Facilitators.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Iida, Mai Tanaka, Minami Torigoe, Sakiko Inaba, Noriaki Wakana, Kazuhiro Homma, Naoto Fukuyama\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/efh.efh_191_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) refers to the application of an active-learning method that has gained popularity across all health-care disciplines. This study aimed to assess nutrition students' perceptions of the roles of student versus faculty facilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the study included, 117 2nd-year nutrition students registered in the \\\"Introduction to Medicine\\\" course in the 2022 academic year at a Japanese university. The first TBL session was faculty-led, whereas three students served as facilitators in the second. Upon completion of the course, learners and student facilitators completed a questionnaire on the student-led TBL. Responses to close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and those to open-ended questions were categorized into common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 learners and 3 student facilitators responded to the questions. Learners found student-led TBL to be just as or more effective than faculty-led TBL in three respects: comprehension (93.0%), active participation (96.5%), and expectation of academic performance improvement (93.9%). According to student facilitators, it improved their knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and leadership abilities. Learners and facilitators indicated that student-led TBL was significantly more effective than faculty-led TBL. Thus, student-led TBL can enhance the ability of all students at different academic levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Student-led TBL appears to be an effective learning strategy in higher education and further shifts toward student-centered learning in the course curriculum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_191_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_191_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于团队的学习(TBL)指的是一种主动学习方法的应用,这种方法已在所有医疗保健学科中得到普及。本研究旨在评估营养学专业学生对学生与教师促进者角色的看法:研究对象包括日本一所大学 2022 学年注册 "医学入门 "课程的 117 名二年级营养学学生。第一节 TBL 课程由教师主持,第二节由三名学生担任主持人。课程结束后,学员和学生主持人填写了一份关于学生主导的 TBL 的调查问卷。对封闭式问题的回答采用描述性统计进行了分析,对开放式问题的回答则按共同主题进行了分类:共有 114 名学习者和 3 名学生辅导员回答了问题。学习者认为,学生主导的 TBL 在以下三个方面与教师主导的 TBL 一样有效或更有效:理解能力(93.0%)、积极参与(96.5%)和期望学业成绩提高(93.9%)。学生辅导员认为,TBL 提高了他们的知识水平、自信心、沟通技巧和领导能力。学习者和促进者表示,学生主导的 TBL 比教师主导的 TBL 更有效。因此,学生主导的 TBL 可以提高不同学术水平的所有学生的能力:讨论:学生主导的 TBL 似乎是高等教育中一种有效的学习策略,进一步推动了课程设置向以学生为中心的学习转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Team-based Learning Impact: A Comparative Study of Student and Faculty Facilitators.

Background: Team-based learning (TBL) refers to the application of an active-learning method that has gained popularity across all health-care disciplines. This study aimed to assess nutrition students' perceptions of the roles of student versus faculty facilitators.

Methods: Participants in the study included, 117 2nd-year nutrition students registered in the "Introduction to Medicine" course in the 2022 academic year at a Japanese university. The first TBL session was faculty-led, whereas three students served as facilitators in the second. Upon completion of the course, learners and student facilitators completed a questionnaire on the student-led TBL. Responses to close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and those to open-ended questions were categorized into common themes.

Results: A total of 114 learners and 3 student facilitators responded to the questions. Learners found student-led TBL to be just as or more effective than faculty-led TBL in three respects: comprehension (93.0%), active participation (96.5%), and expectation of academic performance improvement (93.9%). According to student facilitators, it improved their knowledge, confidence, communication skills, and leadership abilities. Learners and facilitators indicated that student-led TBL was significantly more effective than faculty-led TBL. Thus, student-led TBL can enhance the ability of all students at different academic levels.

Discussion: Student-led TBL appears to be an effective learning strategy in higher education and further shifts toward student-centered learning in the course curriculum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
期刊最新文献
The Way Forward for Integrated Health Sciences Degree Programs Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Lessons learned in development of vision and mission statements How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study Thank you, Michael Glasser!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1