用于全子宫切除术的新型手术机器人 Hugo™ RAS:一项试点研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11
G Monterossi, L Pedone Anchora, R Oliva, A Fagotti, F Fanfani, B Costantini, A Naldini, D Giannarelli, G Scambia
{"title":"用于全子宫切除术的新型手术机器人 Hugo™ RAS:一项试点研究。","authors":"G Monterossi, L Pedone Anchora, R Oliva, A Fagotti, F Fanfani, B Costantini, A Naldini, D Giannarelli, G Scambia","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rising popularity of robotic surgery, Hugo™ RAS is one of the newest surgical robotic platforms. Investigating the reliability of this tool is the first step toward validating its use in clinical practice; and presently there arelimited data available regarding this. The literature is constantly enriched with initial experiences, however no study has demonstrated the safety of this platform yet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate its reliability during total hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A series of 20 consecutive patients scheduled for minimally invasive total hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery were selected to undergo surgery with Hugo™ RAS. Data regarding any malfunction or breakdown of the robotic system as well as intra- and post-operative complications were prospectively recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen of the twenty patients (75.0%) underwent surgery for benign uterine diseases, and five (25.0%) underwent prophylactic surgery. Among the entire series, an instrument fault occurred in one case (5.0%). The problem was solved in 4.8 minutes and without complications for the patient. The median total operative time was 127 min (range, 98-255 min). The median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range:30-125 mL). No intraoperative complications were observed. One patient (5.0%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 post-operative complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, Hugo™ RAS showed high reliability, similar to other robotic devices.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Present findings suggest that Hugo™ RAS is a viable option for major surgical procedures and deserves further investigation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"15 4","pages":"331-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS for total hysterectomy: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"G Monterossi, L Pedone Anchora, R Oliva, A Fagotti, F Fanfani, B Costantini, A Naldini, D Giannarelli, G Scambia\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the rising popularity of robotic surgery, Hugo™ RAS is one of the newest surgical robotic platforms. Investigating the reliability of this tool is the first step toward validating its use in clinical practice; and presently there arelimited data available regarding this. The literature is constantly enriched with initial experiences, however no study has demonstrated the safety of this platform yet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate its reliability during total hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A series of 20 consecutive patients scheduled for minimally invasive total hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery were selected to undergo surgery with Hugo™ RAS. Data regarding any malfunction or breakdown of the robotic system as well as intra- and post-operative complications were prospectively recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen of the twenty patients (75.0%) underwent surgery for benign uterine diseases, and five (25.0%) underwent prophylactic surgery. Among the entire series, an instrument fault occurred in one case (5.0%). The problem was solved in 4.8 minutes and without complications for the patient. The median total operative time was 127 min (range, 98-255 min). The median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range:30-125 mL). No intraoperative complications were observed. One patient (5.0%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 post-operative complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, Hugo™ RAS showed high reliability, similar to other robotic devices.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Present findings suggest that Hugo™ RAS is a viable option for major surgical procedures and deserves further investigation in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"331-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832655/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着机器人手术的普及,Hugo™ RAS 成为最新的机器人手术平台之一。调查该工具的可靠性是验证其在临床实践中应用的第一步;目前,这方面的数据还很有限。文献中不断充实初步经验,但尚未有研究证明该平台的安全性:本研究旨在调查该平台在全子宫切除术中的可靠性:连续选取了 20 例因良性疾病或预防性手术而计划进行微创全子宫切除术(含或不含输卵管切除术)的患者,使用 Hugo™ RAS 进行手术。前瞻性地记录了机器人系统的任何故障或失灵以及术中和术后并发症的相关数据:20例患者中有15例(75.0%)接受了良性子宫疾病手术,5例(25.0%)接受了预防性手术。在整个系列中,有一例(5.0%)发生了器械故障。该问题在 4.8 分钟内得到解决,患者没有出现并发症。手术总时间中位数为 127 分钟(98-255 分钟不等)。估计失血量中位数为 50 毫升(范围:30-125 毫升)。术中未观察到并发症。一名患者(5.0%)术后出现克拉维恩-丁度 2 级并发症:在这项试验性研究中,Hugo™ RAS 显示出与其他机器人设备相似的高可靠性:目前的研究结果表明,Hugo™ RAS 是大型外科手术的可行选择,值得在临床实践中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS for total hysterectomy: a pilot study.

Background: With the rising popularity of robotic surgery, Hugo™ RAS is one of the newest surgical robotic platforms. Investigating the reliability of this tool is the first step toward validating its use in clinical practice; and presently there arelimited data available regarding this. The literature is constantly enriched with initial experiences, however no study has demonstrated the safety of this platform yet.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate its reliability during total hysterectomy.

Materials and methods: A series of 20 consecutive patients scheduled for minimally invasive total hysterectomy with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign disease or prophylactic surgery were selected to undergo surgery with Hugo™ RAS. Data regarding any malfunction or breakdown of the robotic system as well as intra- and post-operative complications were prospectively recorded.

Results: Fifteen of the twenty patients (75.0%) underwent surgery for benign uterine diseases, and five (25.0%) underwent prophylactic surgery. Among the entire series, an instrument fault occurred in one case (5.0%). The problem was solved in 4.8 minutes and without complications for the patient. The median total operative time was 127 min (range, 98-255 min). The median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range:30-125 mL). No intraoperative complications were observed. One patient (5.0%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade 2 post-operative complication.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, Hugo™ RAS showed high reliability, similar to other robotic devices.

What is new?: Present findings suggest that Hugo™ RAS is a viable option for major surgical procedures and deserves further investigation in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1