认知症状类型可与认知测试、感知压力和症状困扰相关联,适用于认知正常和患有痴呆症的老年人。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000595
Shana D Stites, Brian N Lee, Jonathan D Rubright, Kristin Harkins, Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton
{"title":"认知症状类型可与认知测试、感知压力和症状困扰相关联,适用于认知正常和患有痴呆症的老年人。","authors":"Shana D Stites, Brian N Lee, Jonathan D Rubright, Kristin Harkins, Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined how cognitive complaint types (CCTs) correlate with cognitive testing, perceived stress, and symptom distress in older adults with normal cognition and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults (n = 259) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or mild-stage Alzheimer disease completed cognitive testing and self-report measures (Cognitive Difficulties Scale, Global Distress Index, Perceived Stress Scale). Cross-sectional analyses examined: (1) CCT composition by classification method,( 2) CCTs by diagnostic group, (3) correlations of CCTs with cognitive testing scores, and (4) correlations of CCTs with perceived stress and symptom distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCTs derived from 2 classification approaches loaded onto 4 factors: memory, attention-concentration (AC), temporal orientation, and praxis. Memory contained complaints about both memory and executive functioning. AC contained both classifications of AC complaints. Complaints about AC (AC1 and AC2) differed by diagnostic group (all P < 0.05). One of 2 classifications of AC (AC1) complaints discerned between impaired and unimpaired long-delay memory scores (both P < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, that same classification of AC (AC1) complaints correlated with higher perceived stress (both P < 0.001) but not symptom distress (both P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTs showed a factor structure that was mostly robust between classification methods; however, some content-divergent CCTs shared factors, suggesting construct overlap. Relatively slight variations in content altered how CCTs correlated with diagnostic groups, perceived stress, and symptom distress. Most CCTs did not discern between impaired and unimpaired cognitive test scores. Research is needed to better understand CCTs as clinical markers and targets of clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10922433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Complaint Types Can Correlate With Cognitive Testing, Perceived Stress, and Symptom Distress in Older Adults With Normal Cognition and Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Shana D Stites, Brian N Lee, Jonathan D Rubright, Kristin Harkins, Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined how cognitive complaint types (CCTs) correlate with cognitive testing, perceived stress, and symptom distress in older adults with normal cognition and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older adults (n = 259) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or mild-stage Alzheimer disease completed cognitive testing and self-report measures (Cognitive Difficulties Scale, Global Distress Index, Perceived Stress Scale). Cross-sectional analyses examined: (1) CCT composition by classification method,( 2) CCTs by diagnostic group, (3) correlations of CCTs with cognitive testing scores, and (4) correlations of CCTs with perceived stress and symptom distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCTs derived from 2 classification approaches loaded onto 4 factors: memory, attention-concentration (AC), temporal orientation, and praxis. Memory contained complaints about both memory and executive functioning. AC contained both classifications of AC complaints. Complaints about AC (AC1 and AC2) differed by diagnostic group (all P < 0.05). One of 2 classifications of AC (AC1) complaints discerned between impaired and unimpaired long-delay memory scores (both P < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, that same classification of AC (AC1) complaints correlated with higher perceived stress (both P < 0.001) but not symptom distress (both P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTs showed a factor structure that was mostly robust between classification methods; however, some content-divergent CCTs shared factors, suggesting construct overlap. Relatively slight variations in content altered how CCTs correlated with diagnostic groups, perceived stress, and symptom distress. Most CCTs did not discern between impaired and unimpaired cognitive test scores. Research is needed to better understand CCTs as clinical markers and targets of clinical interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10922433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了认知抱怨类型(CCTs)与认知测试的相关性:我们研究了认知投诉类型(CCTs)与认知测试、感知压力和症状困扰的相关性:认知正常、轻度认知障碍或轻度阿尔茨海默病的老年人(n = 259)完成了认知测试和自我报告测量(认知困难量表、总体压力指数、感知压力量表)。横断面分析研究了:(1)按分类方法划分的 CCT 构成;(2)按诊断组划分的 CCT;(3)CCT 与认知测试得分的相关性;以及(4)CCT 与感知压力和症状困扰的相关性:根据两种分类方法得出的 CCT 包含 4 个因子:记忆、注意力集中(AC)、时间定向和实践。记忆包含对记忆和执行功能的抱怨。注意力集中(AC)包含两种注意力集中投诉分类。不同诊断组的交流投诉(AC1 和 AC2)有所不同(所有 P 均小于 0.05)。AC 投诉(AC1)的两个分类中,有一个可区分长延时记忆得分受损和未受损(均为 P <0.05)。在多变量分析中,同样的 AC(AC1)主诉分类与较高的感知压力相关(均为 P <0.001),但与症状困扰无关(均为 P >0.05):CCTs显示了一种因子结构,这种结构在不同分类方法之间大多是稳健的;然而,一些内容不同的CCTs共享因子,这表明了结构重叠。内容上相对轻微的差异改变了 CCT 与诊断组、感知压力和症状困扰的相关性。大多数 CCT 无法区分认知测试成绩受损和未受损。要想更好地了解作为临床标记和临床干预目标的 CCT,还需要进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Complaint Types Can Correlate With Cognitive Testing, Perceived Stress, and Symptom Distress in Older Adults With Normal Cognition and Dementia.

Objective: We examined how cognitive complaint types (CCTs) correlate with cognitive testing, perceived stress, and symptom distress in older adults with normal cognition and dementia.

Methods: Older adults (n = 259) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or mild-stage Alzheimer disease completed cognitive testing and self-report measures (Cognitive Difficulties Scale, Global Distress Index, Perceived Stress Scale). Cross-sectional analyses examined: (1) CCT composition by classification method,( 2) CCTs by diagnostic group, (3) correlations of CCTs with cognitive testing scores, and (4) correlations of CCTs with perceived stress and symptom distress.

Results: CCTs derived from 2 classification approaches loaded onto 4 factors: memory, attention-concentration (AC), temporal orientation, and praxis. Memory contained complaints about both memory and executive functioning. AC contained both classifications of AC complaints. Complaints about AC (AC1 and AC2) differed by diagnostic group (all P < 0.05). One of 2 classifications of AC (AC1) complaints discerned between impaired and unimpaired long-delay memory scores (both P < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, that same classification of AC (AC1) complaints correlated with higher perceived stress (both P < 0.001) but not symptom distress (both P > 0.05).

Conclusion: CCTs showed a factor structure that was mostly robust between classification methods; however, some content-divergent CCTs shared factors, suggesting construct overlap. Relatively slight variations in content altered how CCTs correlated with diagnostic groups, perceived stress, and symptom distress. Most CCTs did not discern between impaired and unimpaired cognitive test scores. Research is needed to better understand CCTs as clinical markers and targets of clinical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: ​Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Cognitive Profiles Between Patients With Alzheimer Dementia With and Without Psychosis: A Rapid Review. Mapping the Landscape of Those Left Behind When a Person With Dementia Dies: Roles of Race and Ethnicity. DXA-Measured Abdominal Adipose Depots and Structural Brain Integrity in Postmenopausal Women. Association of Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity With Cognitive Performance: Evidence From Brazil. Incidence of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Iran From 2010 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1