不同水溶性磷对中国新疆玉米中磷的分布和利用的影响

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Use and Management Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1111/sum.13010
Yuxin Tian, Dao Liu, Xinghong Liu, Fei Liang, Mengjie Liu, Q. Li, Guodong Wang, Peishan Liu, Hongtao Jia
{"title":"不同水溶性磷对中国新疆玉米中磷的分布和利用的影响","authors":"Yuxin Tian, Dao Liu, Xinghong Liu, Fei Liang, Mengjie Liu, Q. Li, Guodong Wang, Peishan Liu, Hongtao Jia","doi":"10.1111/sum.13010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phosphorus (P) is the main limiting nutrient in agriculture. Most of the P fertilizers applied to the soil remain ineffective because of the weak movement and transfer of P in the soil. Current agricultural production requires large amounts of P fertilizers, leading to the accumulation of residual P in the soil and serious ecological problems. Fixation of P is a vital reason for limited fertilizer effectiveness. Therefore, improving soil P effectiveness is the key to reducing soil P accumulation. This study explored the effects of different water‐soluble P fertilizers on maize yield and economic benefits by comparing the relationships between soil P distribution and P absorption and utilisation of maize in a calcareous soil of Xinjiang province in China. The main results indicated that (1) the drip application of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and urea phosphate (UR) was more beneficial for increasing the total P content in the deep soil layer; the drip application of APP was beneficial in increasing the available P content of the deep soil layer. (2) Dripping acid fertilizer was more conducive to reducing soil acidity and alkalinity (pH). (3) The application of different P fertilizers favoured the accumulation of P in all organs of maize, among which APP and UP were the most effective since they increased accumulation by 75.8% and 60.4% (at flowering stage) and 98.2% and 62.3% (at maturity stage), respectively, compared with CK (without P fertilizer). (4) pH was the main factor affecting P uptake and transformation, and the drip application of P fertilizer had the most significant effect on pH. (5) The application of different water‐soluble P fertilizers increased maize yield and economic benefits. Among the five water‐soluble P fertilizers selected in this study, APP had the greatest economic benefits, followed by UP and Monoammonium phosphate (MAP); they increased yields by 31.6%, 24.5%, and 22.0%, respectively, compared with CK.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Water‐Soluble Phosphorus on the Distribution and Utilization of Phosphorus in Maize in Xinjiang, China\",\"authors\":\"Yuxin Tian, Dao Liu, Xinghong Liu, Fei Liang, Mengjie Liu, Q. Li, Guodong Wang, Peishan Liu, Hongtao Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sum.13010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phosphorus (P) is the main limiting nutrient in agriculture. Most of the P fertilizers applied to the soil remain ineffective because of the weak movement and transfer of P in the soil. Current agricultural production requires large amounts of P fertilizers, leading to the accumulation of residual P in the soil and serious ecological problems. Fixation of P is a vital reason for limited fertilizer effectiveness. Therefore, improving soil P effectiveness is the key to reducing soil P accumulation. This study explored the effects of different water‐soluble P fertilizers on maize yield and economic benefits by comparing the relationships between soil P distribution and P absorption and utilisation of maize in a calcareous soil of Xinjiang province in China. The main results indicated that (1) the drip application of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and urea phosphate (UR) was more beneficial for increasing the total P content in the deep soil layer; the drip application of APP was beneficial in increasing the available P content of the deep soil layer. (2) Dripping acid fertilizer was more conducive to reducing soil acidity and alkalinity (pH). (3) The application of different P fertilizers favoured the accumulation of P in all organs of maize, among which APP and UP were the most effective since they increased accumulation by 75.8% and 60.4% (at flowering stage) and 98.2% and 62.3% (at maturity stage), respectively, compared with CK (without P fertilizer). (4) pH was the main factor affecting P uptake and transformation, and the drip application of P fertilizer had the most significant effect on pH. (5) The application of different water‐soluble P fertilizers increased maize yield and economic benefits. Among the five water‐soluble P fertilizers selected in this study, APP had the greatest economic benefits, followed by UP and Monoammonium phosphate (MAP); they increased yields by 31.6%, 24.5%, and 22.0%, respectively, compared with CK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Use and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磷(P)是农业中的主要限制性养分。由于磷在土壤中的移动和转移能力较弱,施入土壤中的大部分磷肥仍然无效。目前的农业生产需要施用大量的磷肥,导致土壤中残留磷的积累和严重的生态问题。磷的固定是肥效有限的重要原因。因此,提高土壤中 P 的有效性是减少土壤中 P 累积的关键。本研究通过比较中国新疆石灰性土壤中土壤磷的分布与玉米对磷的吸收利用之间的关系,探讨了不同水溶性磷肥对玉米产量和经济效益的影响。主要结果表明:(1)滴施多磷酸铵(APP)和磷酸脲(UR)更有利于提高土壤深层总磷含量;滴施多磷酸铵(APP)有利于提高土壤深层可利用磷含量。(2)滴施酸性肥料更有利于降低土壤酸碱度(pH 值)。(3)施用不同的钾肥有利于钾在玉米各器官中的积累,其中 APP 和 UP 的效果最好,与 CK(不施钾肥)相比,它们分别增加了 75.8%和 60.4%(开花期)以及 98.2%和 62.3%(成熟期)的钾积累。(4)pH 值是影响钾吸收和转化的主要因素,滴施钾肥对 pH 值的影响最大。(5)施用不同的水溶性磷肥可提高玉米产量和经济效益。在本研究选择的五种水溶性磷肥中,APP的经济效益最大,其次是UP和磷酸一铵(MAP);与CK相比,它们分别增产31.6%、24.5%和22.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Different Water‐Soluble Phosphorus on the Distribution and Utilization of Phosphorus in Maize in Xinjiang, China
Phosphorus (P) is the main limiting nutrient in agriculture. Most of the P fertilizers applied to the soil remain ineffective because of the weak movement and transfer of P in the soil. Current agricultural production requires large amounts of P fertilizers, leading to the accumulation of residual P in the soil and serious ecological problems. Fixation of P is a vital reason for limited fertilizer effectiveness. Therefore, improving soil P effectiveness is the key to reducing soil P accumulation. This study explored the effects of different water‐soluble P fertilizers on maize yield and economic benefits by comparing the relationships between soil P distribution and P absorption and utilisation of maize in a calcareous soil of Xinjiang province in China. The main results indicated that (1) the drip application of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) and urea phosphate (UR) was more beneficial for increasing the total P content in the deep soil layer; the drip application of APP was beneficial in increasing the available P content of the deep soil layer. (2) Dripping acid fertilizer was more conducive to reducing soil acidity and alkalinity (pH). (3) The application of different P fertilizers favoured the accumulation of P in all organs of maize, among which APP and UP were the most effective since they increased accumulation by 75.8% and 60.4% (at flowering stage) and 98.2% and 62.3% (at maturity stage), respectively, compared with CK (without P fertilizer). (4) pH was the main factor affecting P uptake and transformation, and the drip application of P fertilizer had the most significant effect on pH. (5) The application of different water‐soluble P fertilizers increased maize yield and economic benefits. Among the five water‐soluble P fertilizers selected in this study, APP had the greatest economic benefits, followed by UP and Monoammonium phosphate (MAP); they increased yields by 31.6%, 24.5%, and 22.0%, respectively, compared with CK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status Approaching soil health from a practitioner perspective – Placing practices before indicators for Australian cotton and other producers Soil carbon in the boreal region under climate and land use change Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil with Mg‐Fe‐Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) synthesized from waste red mud Effects of unbalanced fertilizer use on system productivity and profitability under rice‐based cropping systems: Evidence from Eastern Gangetic Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1