{"title":"累积和顺序变化点测试七十年后的状况 Page","authors":"Alexander Aue, Claudia Kirch","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asad079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Quality control charts aim at raising an alarm as soon as sequentially obtained observations of an underlying random process no longer seem to be within stochastic fluctuations prescribed by an ‘in-control’ scenario. Such random processes can often be modelled using the concept of stationarity, or even independence as in most classical works. An important out-of-control scenario is the changepoint alternative, for which the distribution of the process changes at an unknown point in time. In his seminal 1954 Biometrika paper, E. S. Page introduced the famous cumulative sum control charts for changepoint monitoring. Innovatively, decision rules based on cumulative sum procedures took the full history of the process into account, whereas previous procedures were based only on a fixed and typically small number of the most recent observations. The extreme case of using only the most recent observation, often referred to as the Shewhart chart, is more akin to serial outlier than changepoint detection. Page’s cumulative sum approach, introduced seven decades ago, is ubiquitous in modern changepoint analysis, and his original paper has led to a multitude of follow-up papers in different research communities. This review is focused on a particular subfield of this research, namely nonparametric sequential, or online, changepoint tests which are constructed to maintain a desired Type 1 error as opposed to the more traditional approach seeking to minimize the average run length of the procedures. Such tests have originated at the intersection of econometrics and statistics. We trace the development of these tests and highlight their properties, mostly using a simple location model for clarity of exposition, but also review more complex situations such as regression and time series models.","PeriodicalId":9001,"journal":{"name":"Biometrika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of cumulative sum sequential change point testing seventy years after Page\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Aue, Claudia Kirch\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomet/asad079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Quality control charts aim at raising an alarm as soon as sequentially obtained observations of an underlying random process no longer seem to be within stochastic fluctuations prescribed by an ‘in-control’ scenario. Such random processes can often be modelled using the concept of stationarity, or even independence as in most classical works. An important out-of-control scenario is the changepoint alternative, for which the distribution of the process changes at an unknown point in time. In his seminal 1954 Biometrika paper, E. S. Page introduced the famous cumulative sum control charts for changepoint monitoring. Innovatively, decision rules based on cumulative sum procedures took the full history of the process into account, whereas previous procedures were based only on a fixed and typically small number of the most recent observations. The extreme case of using only the most recent observation, often referred to as the Shewhart chart, is more akin to serial outlier than changepoint detection. Page’s cumulative sum approach, introduced seven decades ago, is ubiquitous in modern changepoint analysis, and his original paper has led to a multitude of follow-up papers in different research communities. This review is focused on a particular subfield of this research, namely nonparametric sequential, or online, changepoint tests which are constructed to maintain a desired Type 1 error as opposed to the more traditional approach seeking to minimize the average run length of the procedures. Such tests have originated at the intersection of econometrics and statistics. We trace the development of these tests and highlight their properties, mostly using a simple location model for clarity of exposition, but also review more complex situations such as regression and time series models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrika","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
质量控制图的目的是,一旦连续获得的底层随机过程的观测结果似乎不再符合 "在控 "方案所规定的随机波动范围,就会发出警报。此类随机过程通常可以使用静止概念建模,甚至可以使用大多数经典著作中的独立概念建模。一个重要的失控情景是变化点替代方案,即过程的分布在一个未知的时间点发生变化。E. S. Page 在 1954 年发表的开创性论文《Biometrika》中,提出了著名的用于变化点监控的累积和控制图。创新性的是,基于累积总和程序的决策规则考虑到了整个过程的历史,而以前的程序仅基于固定的、通常为数不多的最新观测数据。仅使用最近观测值的极端情况通常被称为休哈特图表,它更类似于序列离群值,而非变化点检测。佩奇在七十年前提出的累积和方法在现代变化点分析中无处不在,他的原始论文在不同研究领域引发了大量后续论文。本综述的重点是这一研究的一个特殊子领域,即非参数序列或在线变化点检验,其构建目的是保持理想的 1 类误差,而不是寻求最小化程序平均运行长度的传统方法。这类检验起源于计量经济学和统计学的交叉学科。我们追溯了这些检验的发展历程,并强调了它们的特性,为了论述清晰,我们主要使用了简单的位置模型,但也回顾了回归和时间序列模型等更复杂的情况。
The state of cumulative sum sequential change point testing seventy years after Page
Quality control charts aim at raising an alarm as soon as sequentially obtained observations of an underlying random process no longer seem to be within stochastic fluctuations prescribed by an ‘in-control’ scenario. Such random processes can often be modelled using the concept of stationarity, or even independence as in most classical works. An important out-of-control scenario is the changepoint alternative, for which the distribution of the process changes at an unknown point in time. In his seminal 1954 Biometrika paper, E. S. Page introduced the famous cumulative sum control charts for changepoint monitoring. Innovatively, decision rules based on cumulative sum procedures took the full history of the process into account, whereas previous procedures were based only on a fixed and typically small number of the most recent observations. The extreme case of using only the most recent observation, often referred to as the Shewhart chart, is more akin to serial outlier than changepoint detection. Page’s cumulative sum approach, introduced seven decades ago, is ubiquitous in modern changepoint analysis, and his original paper has led to a multitude of follow-up papers in different research communities. This review is focused on a particular subfield of this research, namely nonparametric sequential, or online, changepoint tests which are constructed to maintain a desired Type 1 error as opposed to the more traditional approach seeking to minimize the average run length of the procedures. Such tests have originated at the intersection of econometrics and statistics. We trace the development of these tests and highlight their properties, mostly using a simple location model for clarity of exposition, but also review more complex situations such as regression and time series models.
期刊介绍:
Biometrika is primarily a journal of statistics in which emphasis is placed on papers containing original theoretical contributions of direct or potential value in applications. From time to time, papers in bordering fields are also published.