优质体育(QPE)测量工具开发

IF 0.1 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Sports Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.30819/iss.45-2.02
Walter Ho, Dilsad Ahmed, Klaudia Rafael, Rosa López de D’amico, B. Antala, Min Liu, Xiaoxi Dong, Yang Yang Xie
{"title":"优质体育(QPE)测量工具开发","authors":"Walter Ho, Dilsad Ahmed, Klaudia Rafael, Rosa López de D’amico, B. Antala, Min Liu, Xiaoxi Dong, Yang Yang Xie","doi":"10.30819/iss.45-2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The research on the measurement tool development for Quality Physical Education (QPE)\nstarted in 2010 with the collection of statements on QPE involving 436 professionals from\n44 countries. These statements were sorted into 105 items, and a two-stage content-validity\nprocess narrowed the number down to 65 items under eight dimensions. The selection\nof 65 items served as the basis for developing the questionnaire survey in late 2014,\nwith 1669 responses collected from physical education (PE) professionals across 24\ncountries. The data were analysed by continent, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA)\nwas adopted to exclude items with low factor loadings. The Asian model comprises 48\nitems in eight dimensions and exhibits a good fit structure for research purposes. This\npattern differs from the structure of Europe and Latin America, in which fewer dimensions\nwere retained. The Asian model was independently accessed and matched expectations\nfrom works by UNESCO and other vital documents for QPE improvement. The discovery\nfacilitates the establishment of a good tool for QPE study. This paper shares the\ndifferent stages to inform initiatives for the quality development of PE in schools.\n\n","PeriodicalId":40315,"journal":{"name":"International Sports Studies","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Physical Education (QPE) Measurement Tool Development\",\"authors\":\"Walter Ho, Dilsad Ahmed, Klaudia Rafael, Rosa López de D’amico, B. Antala, Min Liu, Xiaoxi Dong, Yang Yang Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.30819/iss.45-2.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The research on the measurement tool development for Quality Physical Education (QPE)\\nstarted in 2010 with the collection of statements on QPE involving 436 professionals from\\n44 countries. These statements were sorted into 105 items, and a two-stage content-validity\\nprocess narrowed the number down to 65 items under eight dimensions. The selection\\nof 65 items served as the basis for developing the questionnaire survey in late 2014,\\nwith 1669 responses collected from physical education (PE) professionals across 24\\ncountries. The data were analysed by continent, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA)\\nwas adopted to exclude items with low factor loadings. The Asian model comprises 48\\nitems in eight dimensions and exhibits a good fit structure for research purposes. This\\npattern differs from the structure of Europe and Latin America, in which fewer dimensions\\nwere retained. The Asian model was independently accessed and matched expectations\\nfrom works by UNESCO and other vital documents for QPE improvement. The discovery\\nfacilitates the establishment of a good tool for QPE study. This paper shares the\\ndifferent stages to inform initiatives for the quality development of PE in schools.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Sports Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Sports Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.45-2.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sports Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.45-2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于优质体育教育(QPE)测量工具开发的研究始于 2010 年,当时收集了来自 44 个国家的 436 名专业人员关于优质体育教育的陈述。这些陈述被分类为 105 个条目,经过两个阶段的内容验证过程,将条目数量缩减为八个维度下的 65 个条目。选定的 65 个项目成为 2014 年末开展问卷调查的基础,共收集到来自 24 个国家体育教育(PE)专业人员的 1669 份答复。数据按洲进行分析,并采用探索性因子分析(EFA)排除因子载荷较低的项目。亚洲模型包括八个维度的 48 个项目,在研究目的上表现出良好的拟合结构。这种结构与欧洲和拉丁美洲的结构不同,后者保留的维度较少。亚洲模式是独立获取的,与联合国教科文组织的著作和其他有关改善 QPE 的重要文件中的预期相吻合。这一发现有助于为 QPE 研究建立一个良好的工具。本文分享了不同阶段的研究成果,为学校体育的质量发展提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Physical Education (QPE) Measurement Tool Development
The research on the measurement tool development for Quality Physical Education (QPE) started in 2010 with the collection of statements on QPE involving 436 professionals from 44 countries. These statements were sorted into 105 items, and a two-stage content-validity process narrowed the number down to 65 items under eight dimensions. The selection of 65 items served as the basis for developing the questionnaire survey in late 2014, with 1669 responses collected from physical education (PE) professionals across 24 countries. The data were analysed by continent, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was adopted to exclude items with low factor loadings. The Asian model comprises 48 items in eight dimensions and exhibits a good fit structure for research purposes. This pattern differs from the structure of Europe and Latin America, in which fewer dimensions were retained. The Asian model was independently accessed and matched expectations from works by UNESCO and other vital documents for QPE improvement. The discovery facilitates the establishment of a good tool for QPE study. This paper shares the different stages to inform initiatives for the quality development of PE in schools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Sports Studies
International Sports Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: International Sports Studies (ISS) is a scholarly journal in the field of physical education and sport with a unique focus. Its aim is to advance understanding and communication between members of the global community who share a professional, personal or scholarly interest in the state and development of physical education and sport around the world. International Sports Studies (ISS) is today without paradigmatic prejudice and reflects an eclectic approach to the task of understanding physical education and sport in the contemporary world. It asks only that its contributors can add to knowledge about international physical education and sport studies through studies involving comparisons between regional, national and international settings or by providing unique insights into specific national and local phenomena which contribute to an understanding that can be shared across as well as within national borders.
期刊最新文献
Quality Physical Education Perceptions Among PE Professionals: an Exploratory Factor Analysis Understanding Quality Physical Education from the Perspective of Asian PE Professionals The Perception of Quality Physical Education in China Voices from PE Professionals in Mindanao: Expectations Underlying Quality Physical Education Development Quality Physical Education (QPE) Measurement Tool Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1