绿光激光前列腺切除术对尿潴留的疗效

Anastasia MacDonald, Moustafa Fathy, Parsa Nikoufar, A. Hodhod, Ruba Abdul Hadi, Saud Alhelal, Husain Alaradi, A. Zakaria, W. Shahrour, H. Elmansy
{"title":"绿光激光前列腺切除术对尿潴留的疗效","authors":"Anastasia MacDonald, Moustafa Fathy, Parsa Nikoufar, A. Hodhod, Ruba Abdul Hadi, Saud Alhelal, Husain Alaradi, A. Zakaria, W. Shahrour, H. Elmansy","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of GreenLight laser prostatectomy for the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and chronic urinary retention (CUR) and to determine outcomes compared to patients without preoperative urinary retention (UR).\nMethods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy at our institution from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure, median urinary volume drained, or median postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before catheterization or GreenLight laser prostatectomy. CUR was defined as PVR >300 mL in males able to void and initial catheter drainage >1000 mL in males unable to void in the absence of pain. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and catheter-free status.\nResults: One hundred sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included in our study. The UR group consisted of 88 patients (50 AUR and 38 CUR), and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) group was comprised of 80 individuals. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUR and CUR subgroups regarding demographics. The UR group had a significantly higher age and a significantly higher postoperative catheterization length (p=0.000 and 0.000, respectively) compared to the LUTS cohort. The CUR subgroup had a significantly higher PVR at one, three, and six months compared to the AUR subgroup, although other outcome measures were similar between the two cohorts. During three- and 6-month followup visits, the UR group had a significantly higher PVR than the LUTS cohort. At 12 months postoperative, the LUTS group had a higher catheter-free rate than the UR group (p=0.001). The successful first trial of void (TOV) rate for the UR and LUTS groups were 83% and 80%, respectively. At 12 months followup, the catheter-free rate for the UR and LUTS cohorts was 87.5% and 100%, respectively.\nConclusions: GreenLight laser prostatectomy is an effective and durable treatment for UR with a high catheter-free rate and comparable outcomes when performed to manage LUTS.","PeriodicalId":38001,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in urinary retention\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia MacDonald, Moustafa Fathy, Parsa Nikoufar, A. Hodhod, Ruba Abdul Hadi, Saud Alhelal, Husain Alaradi, A. Zakaria, W. Shahrour, H. Elmansy\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of GreenLight laser prostatectomy for the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and chronic urinary retention (CUR) and to determine outcomes compared to patients without preoperative urinary retention (UR).\\nMethods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy at our institution from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure, median urinary volume drained, or median postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before catheterization or GreenLight laser prostatectomy. CUR was defined as PVR >300 mL in males able to void and initial catheter drainage >1000 mL in males unable to void in the absence of pain. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and catheter-free status.\\nResults: One hundred sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included in our study. The UR group consisted of 88 patients (50 AUR and 38 CUR), and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) group was comprised of 80 individuals. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUR and CUR subgroups regarding demographics. The UR group had a significantly higher age and a significantly higher postoperative catheterization length (p=0.000 and 0.000, respectively) compared to the LUTS cohort. The CUR subgroup had a significantly higher PVR at one, three, and six months compared to the AUR subgroup, although other outcome measures were similar between the two cohorts. During three- and 6-month followup visits, the UR group had a significantly higher PVR than the LUTS cohort. At 12 months postoperative, the LUTS group had a higher catheter-free rate than the UR group (p=0.001). The successful first trial of void (TOV) rate for the UR and LUTS groups were 83% and 80%, respectively. At 12 months followup, the catheter-free rate for the UR and LUTS cohorts was 87.5% and 100%, respectively.\\nConclusions: GreenLight laser prostatectomy is an effective and durable treatment for UR with a high catheter-free rate and comparable outcomes when performed to manage LUTS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介我们的研究旨在评估 GreenLight 激光前列腺切除术治疗急性尿潴留(AUR)和慢性尿潴留(CUR)的疗效和耐久性,并确定与术前无尿潴留(UR)患者相比的结果:我们对 2018 年 5 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在我院接受 GreenLight 激光前列腺切除术的患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性研究。我们记录了患者的人口统计学特征和结果测量指标,包括手术适应症、中位排尿量或导尿或 GreenLight 激光前列腺切除术前的中位排尿后残余尿量(PVR)。如果男性能够排尿,PVR>300 毫升;如果男性在无疼痛的情况下无法排尿,导尿管初始排尿量>1000 毫升,则定义为CUR。所有患者均在术后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月进行了随访。我们的评估包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量(QoL)评估、最大尿流率(Qmax)、PVR 和无导尿管状态:共有 168 名男性接受了绿光激光前列腺切除术。UR组有88名患者(50名AUR患者和38名CUR患者),下尿路症状(LUTS)组有80名患者。在人口统计学方面,AUR 和 CUR 亚组之间没有明显差异。与 LUTS 组相比,UR 组的年龄明显较高,术后导尿时间明显较长(P=0.000 和 0.000)。与 AUR 亚组相比,CUR 亚组在 1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时的 PVR 明显更高,但两组的其他结果指标相似。在 3 个月和 6 个月的随访中,UR 组的 PVR 明显高于 LUTS 组。术后 12 个月,LUTS 组的无导管率高于 UR 组(P=0.001)。UR 组和 LUTS 组的首次排空成功率(TOV)分别为 83% 和 80%。在12个月的随访中,UR组和LUTS组的无导管率分别为87.5%和100%:结论:绿光激光前列腺切除术是一种有效、持久的治疗 UR 的方法,无导管率高,治疗 LUTS 的疗效相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in urinary retention
Introduction: The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of GreenLight laser prostatectomy for the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and chronic urinary retention (CUR) and to determine outcomes compared to patients without preoperative urinary retention (UR). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from individuals who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy at our institution from May 2018 to July 2022. Patient demographics and outcome measures were recorded, including indications for the procedure, median urinary volume drained, or median postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before catheterization or GreenLight laser prostatectomy. CUR was defined as PVR >300 mL in males able to void and initial catheter drainage >1000 mL in males unable to void in the absence of pain. All patients had postoperative followup visits at one, three, six, and 12 months. Our evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), PVR, and catheter-free status. Results: One hundred sixty-eight males who underwent GreenLight laser prostatectomy were included in our study. The UR group consisted of 88 patients (50 AUR and 38 CUR), and the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) group was comprised of 80 individuals. There were no statistically significant differences between the AUR and CUR subgroups regarding demographics. The UR group had a significantly higher age and a significantly higher postoperative catheterization length (p=0.000 and 0.000, respectively) compared to the LUTS cohort. The CUR subgroup had a significantly higher PVR at one, three, and six months compared to the AUR subgroup, although other outcome measures were similar between the two cohorts. During three- and 6-month followup visits, the UR group had a significantly higher PVR than the LUTS cohort. At 12 months postoperative, the LUTS group had a higher catheter-free rate than the UR group (p=0.001). The successful first trial of void (TOV) rate for the UR and LUTS groups were 83% and 80%, respectively. At 12 months followup, the catheter-free rate for the UR and LUTS cohorts was 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: GreenLight laser prostatectomy is an effective and durable treatment for UR with a high catheter-free rate and comparable outcomes when performed to manage LUTS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Published by the Canadian Urological Association, the Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ) released its first issue in March 2007, and was published four times that year under the guidance of founding editor (Editor Emeritus as of 2012), Dr. Laurence H. Klotz. In 2008, CUAJ became a bimonthly publication. As of 2013, articles have been published monthly, alternating between print and online-only versions (print issues are available in February, April, June, August, October, and December; online-only issues are produced in January, March, May, July, September, and November). In 2017, the journal launched an ahead-of-print publishing strategy, in which accepted manuscripts are published electronically on our website and cited on PubMed ahead of their official issue-based publication date. By significantly shortening the time to article availability, we offer our readers more flexibility in the way they engage with our content: as a continuous stream, or in a monthly “package,” or both. CUAJ covers a broad range of urological topics — oncology, pediatrics, transplantation, endourology, female urology, infertility, and more. We take pride in showcasing the work of some of Canada’s top investigators and providing our readers with the latest relevant evidence-based research, and on being the primary repository for major guidelines and other important practice recommendations. Our long-term vision is to become an essential destination for urology-based research, education, and advocacy for both physicians and patients, and to act as a springboard for discussions within the urologic community.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-assisted bedside ureteric stent placement 2024 Canadian Urological Association endorsement of an expert report: Kidney involvement in tuberous sclerosis complex Sacral neuromodulation in pediatric refractory bladder and bowel dysfunction Fostering the continued growth of our association On vacation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1