复杂平等与统计公平的抽象性:利用社会商品分析简历扫描仪和福利欺诈检测器

Bauke Wielinga
{"title":"复杂平等与统计公平的抽象性:利用社会商品分析简历扫描仪和福利欺诈检测器","authors":"Bauke Wielinga","doi":"10.1007/s43681-023-00384-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the possibility of using Michael Walzer’s theory of <i>Spheres of Justice</i> (or <i>Complex Equality)</i> as a means to counter some of the pitfalls of current statistical approaches to algorithmic fairness. Walzer’s account of justice, which is based on social goods and their distributive criteria, is used to analyze two hypothetical algorithms: a CV scanner and a welfare fraud detector. It is argued that using complex equality in this way can help address some of the problems caused by the abstractness of statistical fairness metrics and can help guide the choice of an appropriate metric.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 1","pages":"617 - 632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex equality and the abstractness of statistical fairness: using social goods to analyze a CV scanner and a welfare fraud detector\",\"authors\":\"Bauke Wielinga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43681-023-00384-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper explores the possibility of using Michael Walzer’s theory of <i>Spheres of Justice</i> (or <i>Complex Equality)</i> as a means to counter some of the pitfalls of current statistical approaches to algorithmic fairness. Walzer’s account of justice, which is based on social goods and their distributive criteria, is used to analyze two hypothetical algorithms: a CV scanner and a welfare fraud detector. It is argued that using complex equality in this way can help address some of the problems caused by the abstractness of statistical fairness metrics and can help guide the choice of an appropriate metric.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI and ethics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"617 - 632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00384-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00384-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了使用Michael Walzer的正义领域(或复杂平等)理论作为一种手段来对抗当前算法公平统计方法的一些陷阱的可能性。沃尔泽对正义的描述是基于社会商品及其分配标准的,他用来分析两种假设的算法:简历扫描器和福利欺诈检测器。有人认为,以这种方式使用复等式可以帮助解决由统计公平指标的抽象性引起的一些问题,并可以帮助指导选择适当的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Complex equality and the abstractness of statistical fairness: using social goods to analyze a CV scanner and a welfare fraud detector

This paper explores the possibility of using Michael Walzer’s theory of Spheres of Justice (or Complex Equality) as a means to counter some of the pitfalls of current statistical approaches to algorithmic fairness. Walzer’s account of justice, which is based on social goods and their distributive criteria, is used to analyze two hypothetical algorithms: a CV scanner and a welfare fraud detector. It is argued that using complex equality in this way can help address some of the problems caused by the abstractness of statistical fairness metrics and can help guide the choice of an appropriate metric.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Responsible Artificial Intelligence for Earth observation: human rights and the EU AI act A ternary logic framework for institutional governance: addressing the enforcement gap in global economic systems The end of prescriptive ethics: toward an ontology of co-consciousness in hybrid human–AI systems The safety failures we are not instrumenting: a perspective on hidden safety-critical challenges in modern AI systems Social stereotypes in AI text-to-image generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1