{"title":"减压颅骨切除术在治疗创伤性脑损伤中的作用 - 随机对照试验的 Meta 分析","authors":"Qiang Zhang, Yuhuan Li, Xiaozan Chang","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_432_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious medical condition that often leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is now widely recognized as a primary or secondary treatment option for managing intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe TBI. However, there is a lack of clarity in reviews regarding the impact of DC on TBI outcomes.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of DC in terms of overall mortality and long-term prognosis among patients with TBI.\n \n \n \n We conducted a systematic search of four common databases to include all parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We selected studies that reported outcomes for TBI cases, with DC as a treatment option. The outcomes examined included reduction in mortality, ICP levels, and the proportion of patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score >4.\n \n \n \n Our review finally included eight RCTs [n = 1458, with 749 and 709 patients in the DC and control groups, respectively]. The weighted mean difference for ICP was estimated at -4.01 (95% Confidence interval [CI -5.31–-2.71), indicating a statistically significant reduction in ICP levels in the DC group compared to the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.51–0.89), suggesting a statistically significant 31% decrease in mortality levels in the DC group. Subgroup and sensitivity analyzes were also conducted to address heterogeneity.\n \n \n \n In conclusion, based on our meta-analysis, we find that DC can be considered a crucial surgical intervention for reducing mortality among patients with TBI when compared to control groups.\n","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Zhang, Yuhuan Li, Xiaozan Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aian.aian_432_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious medical condition that often leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is now widely recognized as a primary or secondary treatment option for managing intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe TBI. However, there is a lack of clarity in reviews regarding the impact of DC on TBI outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of DC in terms of overall mortality and long-term prognosis among patients with TBI.\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a systematic search of four common databases to include all parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We selected studies that reported outcomes for TBI cases, with DC as a treatment option. The outcomes examined included reduction in mortality, ICP levels, and the proportion of patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score >4.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our review finally included eight RCTs [n = 1458, with 749 and 709 patients in the DC and control groups, respectively]. The weighted mean difference for ICP was estimated at -4.01 (95% Confidence interval [CI -5.31–-2.71), indicating a statistically significant reduction in ICP levels in the DC group compared to the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.51–0.89), suggesting a statistically significant 31% decrease in mortality levels in the DC group. Subgroup and sensitivity analyzes were also conducted to address heterogeneity.\\n \\n \\n \\n In conclusion, based on our meta-analysis, we find that DC can be considered a crucial surgical intervention for reducing mortality among patients with TBI when compared to control groups.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":8036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_432_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_432_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一种严重的内科疾病,通常会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。目前,减压开颅术(DC)被广泛认为是控制严重 TBI 患者颅内压(ICP)的主要或辅助治疗方案。然而,有关减压开颅术对创伤性脑损伤预后影响的综述尚不明确。 本研究旨在评估 DC 对创伤性脑损伤患者总死亡率和长期预后的有效性。 我们对四个常用数据库进行了系统性检索,以纳入所有平行臂随机对照试验(RCT)。我们选择了以 DC 作为治疗方案的创伤性脑损伤病例的结果报告研究。我们的综述最终纳入了 8 项 RCT [n = 1458,DC 组和对照组分别有 749 和 709 名患者]。ICP的加权平均差估计为-4.01(95% 置信区间[CI -5.31--2.71]),表明与对照组相比,DC组ICP水平的下降具有统计学意义。汇总风险比为 0.67 (95% CI 0.51-0.89),表明 DC 组的死亡率在统计学上显著降低了 31%。我们还针对异质性进行了分组分析和敏感性分析。 总之,根据我们的荟萃分析,我们发现与对照组相比,直流电可被视为降低创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的重要外科干预措施。
Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious medical condition that often leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is now widely recognized as a primary or secondary treatment option for managing intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe TBI. However, there is a lack of clarity in reviews regarding the impact of DC on TBI outcomes.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of DC in terms of overall mortality and long-term prognosis among patients with TBI.
We conducted a systematic search of four common databases to include all parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We selected studies that reported outcomes for TBI cases, with DC as a treatment option. The outcomes examined included reduction in mortality, ICP levels, and the proportion of patients with a Glasgow Outcome Scale score >4.
Our review finally included eight RCTs [n = 1458, with 749 and 709 patients in the DC and control groups, respectively]. The weighted mean difference for ICP was estimated at -4.01 (95% Confidence interval [CI -5.31–-2.71), indicating a statistically significant reduction in ICP levels in the DC group compared to the control group. The pooled risk ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.51–0.89), suggesting a statistically significant 31% decrease in mortality levels in the DC group. Subgroup and sensitivity analyzes were also conducted to address heterogeneity.
In conclusion, based on our meta-analysis, we find that DC can be considered a crucial surgical intervention for reducing mortality among patients with TBI when compared to control groups.
期刊介绍:
The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.