迈向梦想史学

Q3 Arts and Humanities Poligrafi Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.35469/poligrafi.2023.414
Laura J. Vollmer
{"title":"迈向梦想史学","authors":"Laura J. Vollmer","doi":"10.35469/poligrafi.2023.414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historiography of dreams has yet to emerge as a distinct field, and key changes in dream research are worthy of consideration to reflect on tacit knowledge in academia. Gesturing toward such a historiography, the historical construction of the “dream” is examined from a discursive perspective via localization in the internal/external and subjective/objective, communicative and social imagined spaces of dreams, as well as the theoretical paradigms of essentialism and contextualism. Premodern to post-postmodern epistemes are considered as shaping forces in these discourses, involving power and authority in determining what counts as legitimate or significant knowledge. The discussion concludes with reflections on the current state of dream research from a post-postmodern perspective, suggesting the ontological multiplicity of the “dream.”","PeriodicalId":36657,"journal":{"name":"Poligrafi","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Historiography of Dreams\",\"authors\":\"Laura J. Vollmer\",\"doi\":\"10.35469/poligrafi.2023.414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The historiography of dreams has yet to emerge as a distinct field, and key changes in dream research are worthy of consideration to reflect on tacit knowledge in academia. Gesturing toward such a historiography, the historical construction of the “dream” is examined from a discursive perspective via localization in the internal/external and subjective/objective, communicative and social imagined spaces of dreams, as well as the theoretical paradigms of essentialism and contextualism. Premodern to post-postmodern epistemes are considered as shaping forces in these discourses, involving power and authority in determining what counts as legitimate or significant knowledge. The discussion concludes with reflections on the current state of dream research from a post-postmodern perspective, suggesting the ontological multiplicity of the “dream.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":36657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poligrafi\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poligrafi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2023.414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poligrafi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35469/poligrafi.2023.414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梦的历史学作为一个独特的领域尚未出现,梦研究的主要变化值得思考,以反思学术界的隐性知识。以这种历史学为导向,通过梦的内部/外部、主观/客观、交流和社会想象空间的定位,以及本质主义和语境主义的理论范式,从话语的角度考察了 "梦 "的历史建构。从前现代到后现代的认识论被认为是这些论述的塑造力量,涉及到决定什么是合法或重要知识的权力和权威。讨论最后从后后现代的角度反思了梦的研究现状,提出了 "梦 "在本体论上的多重性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward a Historiography of Dreams
The historiography of dreams has yet to emerge as a distinct field, and key changes in dream research are worthy of consideration to reflect on tacit knowledge in academia. Gesturing toward such a historiography, the historical construction of the “dream” is examined from a discursive perspective via localization in the internal/external and subjective/objective, communicative and social imagined spaces of dreams, as well as the theoretical paradigms of essentialism and contextualism. Premodern to post-postmodern epistemes are considered as shaping forces in these discourses, involving power and authority in determining what counts as legitimate or significant knowledge. The discussion concludes with reflections on the current state of dream research from a post-postmodern perspective, suggesting the ontological multiplicity of the “dream.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Poligrafi
Poligrafi Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Somaesthetics of Heaviness and Hara in Zen Buddhist Meditation Last Sanctum of Archetypes Intentio Spiritus Ancient Disease in a Modern World Dreaming in the Digital Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1