{"title":"在载荷和阻力模型偏差数据有限的情况下,估算简单极限状态下计算阻力系数的置信度","authors":"R. Bathurst, Reza Jamshidi Chenari","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of the resistance factor in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for simple soil-structure limit states is most often based on model bias data of limited size. Frequently, the bias data are only available or required for the resistance term. In this paper, the confidence in the estimate of the mean of the resistance factor is computed for the case of one resistance factor and one load factor where limited model bias data are available for both load and resistance terms. The bootstrap method is used to compute synthetic load and resistance bias data sets from which confidence intervals on the point (mean) estimate of the resistance factor and load factor are computed. A closed-form solution is used to calculate the resistance factor for a single prescribed load factor and target reliability index, bias data, and nominal load and resistance variables that are lognormally distributed. However, the approach is general using Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated using the case of the internal stability pullout limit state for steel strip mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The example demonstrates the quantitative influence on pullout design using upper and lower 95% confidence interval limits for load and resistance factors.","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":"104 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of confidence in the calculated resistance factor for simple limit states with limited data for load and resistance model bias\",\"authors\":\"R. Bathurst, Reza Jamshidi Chenari\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cgj-2023-0424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Estimation of the resistance factor in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for simple soil-structure limit states is most often based on model bias data of limited size. Frequently, the bias data are only available or required for the resistance term. In this paper, the confidence in the estimate of the mean of the resistance factor is computed for the case of one resistance factor and one load factor where limited model bias data are available for both load and resistance terms. The bootstrap method is used to compute synthetic load and resistance bias data sets from which confidence intervals on the point (mean) estimate of the resistance factor and load factor are computed. A closed-form solution is used to calculate the resistance factor for a single prescribed load factor and target reliability index, bias data, and nominal load and resistance variables that are lognormally distributed. However, the approach is general using Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated using the case of the internal stability pullout limit state for steel strip mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The example demonstrates the quantitative influence on pullout design using upper and lower 95% confidence interval limits for load and resistance factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"volume\":\"104 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of confidence in the calculated resistance factor for simple limit states with limited data for load and resistance model bias
Estimation of the resistance factor in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for simple soil-structure limit states is most often based on model bias data of limited size. Frequently, the bias data are only available or required for the resistance term. In this paper, the confidence in the estimate of the mean of the resistance factor is computed for the case of one resistance factor and one load factor where limited model bias data are available for both load and resistance terms. The bootstrap method is used to compute synthetic load and resistance bias data sets from which confidence intervals on the point (mean) estimate of the resistance factor and load factor are computed. A closed-form solution is used to calculate the resistance factor for a single prescribed load factor and target reliability index, bias data, and nominal load and resistance variables that are lognormally distributed. However, the approach is general using Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated using the case of the internal stability pullout limit state for steel strip mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The example demonstrates the quantitative influence on pullout design using upper and lower 95% confidence interval limits for load and resistance factors.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling.
Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.