{"title":"用于测井曲线校准的经验型 CNN 模型","authors":"Xinyu Hu, Hui Li, Hao Zhang, Baohai Wu, Li Ma, Xiaogang Wen, Jinghuai Gao","doi":"10.1190/geo2022-0696.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental calibration of logging curves is critical to petrophysical interpretation and sweet spot characterization. Wellbore failure frequently occurs in clay-rich (shalely) rocks during drilling, leading to biased logging interpretation and uncertainty. To reduce the biased correction or erroneous decision-making in the interpreter-dominated logging curve calibration process, we develop an empirically-informed CNN (EiCNN) logging curve correction strategy to calibrate the borehole failure-induced logging curve abnormity more accurately. The EiCNN method, together with high-quality logging curves as labeled samples, provides a nonlinear mapping between input logging curves and calibrations for the distorted curves. The EiCNN method completely alleviates biased correction or decision-making by the interpreter-dominated method. It has strong generalization ability, using many empirically interpreted high-quality data as input samples. The field validation wells demonstrate that the EiCNN model can precisely correct the distorted logging curves of mudstone segments with a correlation coefficient of >0.95. Moreover, the validation and test wells illustrate that the EiCNN method is capable of precisely correcting logging curves of interlayer mudstone, implying that the EiCNN method, to a certain degree, can also accurately perform environmental correction of logging curves from thin mudstone layers.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirically-informed CNN model for logging curve calibration\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Hu, Hui Li, Hao Zhang, Baohai Wu, Li Ma, Xiaogang Wen, Jinghuai Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1190/geo2022-0696.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental calibration of logging curves is critical to petrophysical interpretation and sweet spot characterization. Wellbore failure frequently occurs in clay-rich (shalely) rocks during drilling, leading to biased logging interpretation and uncertainty. To reduce the biased correction or erroneous decision-making in the interpreter-dominated logging curve calibration process, we develop an empirically-informed CNN (EiCNN) logging curve correction strategy to calibrate the borehole failure-induced logging curve abnormity more accurately. The EiCNN method, together with high-quality logging curves as labeled samples, provides a nonlinear mapping between input logging curves and calibrations for the distorted curves. The EiCNN method completely alleviates biased correction or decision-making by the interpreter-dominated method. It has strong generalization ability, using many empirically interpreted high-quality data as input samples. The field validation wells demonstrate that the EiCNN model can precisely correct the distorted logging curves of mudstone segments with a correlation coefficient of >0.95. Moreover, the validation and test wells illustrate that the EiCNN method is capable of precisely correcting logging curves of interlayer mudstone, implying that the EiCNN method, to a certain degree, can also accurately perform environmental correction of logging curves from thin mudstone layers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0696.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0696.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empirically-informed CNN model for logging curve calibration
Environmental calibration of logging curves is critical to petrophysical interpretation and sweet spot characterization. Wellbore failure frequently occurs in clay-rich (shalely) rocks during drilling, leading to biased logging interpretation and uncertainty. To reduce the biased correction or erroneous decision-making in the interpreter-dominated logging curve calibration process, we develop an empirically-informed CNN (EiCNN) logging curve correction strategy to calibrate the borehole failure-induced logging curve abnormity more accurately. The EiCNN method, together with high-quality logging curves as labeled samples, provides a nonlinear mapping between input logging curves and calibrations for the distorted curves. The EiCNN method completely alleviates biased correction or decision-making by the interpreter-dominated method. It has strong generalization ability, using many empirically interpreted high-quality data as input samples. The field validation wells demonstrate that the EiCNN model can precisely correct the distorted logging curves of mudstone segments with a correlation coefficient of >0.95. Moreover, the validation and test wells illustrate that the EiCNN method is capable of precisely correcting logging curves of interlayer mudstone, implying that the EiCNN method, to a certain degree, can also accurately perform environmental correction of logging curves from thin mudstone layers.
期刊介绍:
Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics.
Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research.
Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring.
The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.