Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok
{"title":"认知能力的 10 年变化与后续死亡率之间的关系:积极的","authors":"Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"190 ","pages":"392 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 10-YEAR CHANGES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT MORTALITY: FINDINGS FROM THE ACTIVE\",\"authors\":\"Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"392 - 392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 认知能力和认知能力下降与老年人的死亡率有关。然而,人们对认知干预对这一人群死亡率结果的作用知之甚少。我们利用 "独立和活力老年人高级认知训练(ACTIVE)"试验的 20 年随访数据,研究了认知变化与死亡风险之间的关系,以及 ACTIVE 认知训练(记忆、推理和处理速度)对死亡风险的影响。死亡率是通过与国家死亡指数数据库的链接确定的。为了将死亡时间作为认知变化和训练效果的函数来建模,我们使用了共享的成长-生存模型,并将同时估算的潜在截距和斜率作为预测因子。在2802名参与者中,有2021人在2019年或之前死亡(占72.1%)。在调整协变量后,较高的基线水平和较慢的全球认知下降速度都与较低的全因死亡率相关(HR = 0.68,95% CI 0.58,0.79;HR = 0.42,95% CI 0.40,0.44)。我们没有观察到 ACTIVE 认知训练在记忆、推理或处理速度方面对全因死亡率有任何明显影响。我们的研究结果表明,认知变化轨迹与老年人死亡率之间存在关联,与认知训练干预措施无关。我们还需要做更多的工作,以确定可促进健康长寿的非药物干预的相关时机和方式。
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 10-YEAR CHANGES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT MORTALITY: FINDINGS FROM THE ACTIVE
Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.