认知能力的 10 年变化与后续死亡率之间的关系:积极的

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297
Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok
{"title":"认知能力的 10 年变化与后续死亡率之间的关系:积极的","authors":"Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"190 ","pages":"392 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 10-YEAR CHANGES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT MORTALITY: FINDINGS FROM THE ACTIVE\",\"authors\":\"Diefei Chen, Alden L. Gross, Sherry Willis, George W. Rebok\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"392 - 392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.1297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 认知能力和认知能力下降与老年人的死亡率有关。然而,人们对认知干预对这一人群死亡率结果的作用知之甚少。我们利用 "独立和活力老年人高级认知训练(ACTIVE)"试验的 20 年随访数据,研究了认知变化与死亡风险之间的关系,以及 ACTIVE 认知训练(记忆、推理和处理速度)对死亡风险的影响。死亡率是通过与国家死亡指数数据库的链接确定的。为了将死亡时间作为认知变化和训练效果的函数来建模,我们使用了共享的成长-生存模型,并将同时估算的潜在截距和斜率作为预测因子。在2802名参与者中,有2021人在2019年或之前死亡(占72.1%)。在调整协变量后,较高的基线水平和较慢的全球认知下降速度都与较低的全因死亡率相关(HR = 0.68,95% CI 0.58,0.79;HR = 0.42,95% CI 0.40,0.44)。我们没有观察到 ACTIVE 认知训练在记忆、推理或处理速度方面对全因死亡率有任何明显影响。我们的研究结果表明,认知变化轨迹与老年人死亡率之间存在关联,与认知训练干预措施无关。我们还需要做更多的工作,以确定可促进健康长寿的非药物干预的相关时机和方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 10-YEAR CHANGES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT MORTALITY: FINDINGS FROM THE ACTIVE
Abstract Cognitive ability and cognitive decline have been linked with mortality in older adults. However, little was understood about the role of cognitive interventions on mortality outcomes in this population. Using twenty-year follow-up data from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, we examined the association between cognitive change and mortality risk, and the effect of ACTIVE cognitive training (memory, reasoning, and speed of processing) on mortality risk. Mortality was ascertained through linkage to the National Death Index database. To model time to death as a function of cognitive change and training effect, we used shared growth-survival models with simultaneously estimated latent intercepts and slopes as predictors. Among the 2802 participants, 2021 died on or before the year 2019 (72.1%). Both higher baseline level and slower decline in global cognition were associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58, 0.79; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.40, 0.44, respectively). We did not observe any significant effects of ACTIVE cognitive training in memory, reasoning, or speed of processing on all-cause mortality. Our findings demonstrated the association between the trajectory of cognitive change and mortality among older adults, independent of cognitive training interventions. More work is needed to identify relevant timing as well as modalities of non-pharmaceutical interventions that can promote healthy longevity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
期刊最新文献
Life-Course Multidisciplinary Psychosocial Predictors of Dementia Among Older Adults: Results From the Health and Retirement Study. What Characteristics Modify the Relation of Neighborhood Walkability and Walking Behavior in Older Adults? Gender Selectively Mediates the Association Between Sex and Memory in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. The Effects of Social Interaction Intervention on Cognitive Functions Among Older Adults Without Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Association Between Social Isolation and Incident Dementia Among Older Adults: Evidence From National Health and Aging Trend Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1