证据等级和研究设计:皮肤流行病学研究方法简介

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.4103/ds.ds-d-23-00159
Yen-Ning Chen, Ching-Chi Chi*
{"title":"证据等级和研究设计:皮肤流行病学研究方法简介","authors":"Yen-Ning Chen, Ching-Chi Chi*","doi":"10.4103/ds.ds-d-23-00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Levels of evidence (LOE), also known as hierarchies of evidence, are determined primarily by the inherent bias and validity of the study designs. Understanding LOE is a crucial preliminary step in practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM) or evidence-based dermatology. These hierarchies facilitate the efficient acquisition of the best available evidence for clinicians in decision-making, as well as guiding researchers in conducting new studies with appropriate designs while considering the next higher LOE necessary to improve the quality of currently available evidence. This article provides a concise overview of LOE and study designs based on the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine LOE for treatment benefits. We utilize examples from medical literature to elucidate the strengths and limitations of various study designs. Furthermore, we shed light on the key concepts of the updated evidence pyramid and how the EBM research roadmap functions to bridge the gap between current best evidence and clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels of evidence and study designs: A brief introduction to dermato-epidemiologic research methodology\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Ning Chen, Ching-Chi Chi*\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ds.ds-d-23-00159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Levels of evidence (LOE), also known as hierarchies of evidence, are determined primarily by the inherent bias and validity of the study designs. Understanding LOE is a crucial preliminary step in practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM) or evidence-based dermatology. These hierarchies facilitate the efficient acquisition of the best available evidence for clinicians in decision-making, as well as guiding researchers in conducting new studies with appropriate designs while considering the next higher LOE necessary to improve the quality of currently available evidence. This article provides a concise overview of LOE and study designs based on the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine LOE for treatment benefits. We utilize examples from medical literature to elucidate the strengths and limitations of various study designs. Furthermore, we shed light on the key concepts of the updated evidence pyramid and how the EBM research roadmap functions to bridge the gap between current best evidence and clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ds.ds-d-23-00159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ds.ds-d-23-00159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

证据等级(LOE)又称证据层次,主要由研究设计的内在偏差和有效性决定。了解 LOE 是实践循证医学(EBM)或循证皮肤病学的重要第一步。这些分级有助于临床医生在决策过程中有效地获取最佳可用证据,并指导研究人员以适当的设计开展新的研究,同时考虑提高现有证据质量所需的下一个更高的LOE。本文以2011年牛津循证医学中心(Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine)的治疗效益LOE为基础,简要概述了LOE和研究设计。我们利用医学文献中的实例来阐明各种研究设计的优势和局限性。此外,我们还阐明了最新证据金字塔的关键概念,以及循证医学研究路线图如何发挥弥合当前最佳证据与临床实践之间差距的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Levels of evidence and study designs: A brief introduction to dermato-epidemiologic research methodology
Levels of evidence (LOE), also known as hierarchies of evidence, are determined primarily by the inherent bias and validity of the study designs. Understanding LOE is a crucial preliminary step in practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM) or evidence-based dermatology. These hierarchies facilitate the efficient acquisition of the best available evidence for clinicians in decision-making, as well as guiding researchers in conducting new studies with appropriate designs while considering the next higher LOE necessary to improve the quality of currently available evidence. This article provides a concise overview of LOE and study designs based on the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine LOE for treatment benefits. We utilize examples from medical literature to elucidate the strengths and limitations of various study designs. Furthermore, we shed light on the key concepts of the updated evidence pyramid and how the EBM research roadmap functions to bridge the gap between current best evidence and clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1