Hyunseok Lee, D. Oh, Y. Ahn, Hongryull Pyo, Kyungmi Yang, J. Noh
{"title":"胸腺上皮肿瘤患者术后放疗技术比较","authors":"Hyunseok Lee, D. Oh, Y. Ahn, Hongryull Pyo, Kyungmi Yang, J. Noh","doi":"10.3857/roj.2023.00360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lower mean lung dose (4.4 Gy vs. 7.6 Gy vs. 10.9 Gy, respectively; p < 0.001), lower mean heart dose (5.4 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy vs. 13.1 Gy, respectively; p = 0.003), and lower mean esophageal dose than patients in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups (6.3 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy vs. 13.5 Gy, respectively; p = 0.011). Twenty patients (19.8%) showed disease recurrence, and seven patients (6.9%) died. The differences in the survival rates between RT groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In patients with TET who underwent adjuvant RT, PBT resulted in a lower dose of exposure to adjacent organs at risk. Survival outcomes for patients in PBT group were not significantly different from those in other groups.","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Hyunseok Lee, D. Oh, Y. Ahn, Hongryull Pyo, Kyungmi Yang, J. Noh\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2023.00360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"lower mean lung dose (4.4 Gy vs. 7.6 Gy vs. 10.9 Gy, respectively; p < 0.001), lower mean heart dose (5.4 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy vs. 13.1 Gy, respectively; p = 0.003), and lower mean esophageal dose than patients in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups (6.3 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy vs. 13.5 Gy, respectively; p = 0.011). Twenty patients (19.8%) showed disease recurrence, and seven patients (6.9%) died. The differences in the survival rates between RT groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In patients with TET who underwent adjuvant RT, PBT resulted in a lower dose of exposure to adjacent organs at risk. Survival outcomes for patients in PBT group were not significantly different from those in other groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与 3D-CRT 组和 IMRT 组患者相比,3D-CRT 组患者的平均肺部剂量(分别为 4.4 Gy vs. 7.6 Gy vs. 10.9 Gy;p < 0.001)、平均心脏剂量(分别为 5.4 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy vs. 13.1 Gy;p = 0.003)和平均食管剂量(分别为 6.3 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy vs. 13.5 Gy;p = 0.011)更低。20名患者(19.8%)出现疾病复发,7名患者(6.9%)死亡。不同 RT 组的存活率差异无统计学意义。结论在接受辅助 RT 的 TET 患者中,PBT 对邻近危险器官的照射剂量较低。PBT组患者的存活率与其他组没有明显差异。
Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy
lower mean lung dose (4.4 Gy vs. 7.6 Gy vs. 10.9 Gy, respectively; p < 0.001), lower mean heart dose (5.4 Gy vs. 10.0 Gy vs. 13.1 Gy, respectively; p = 0.003), and lower mean esophageal dose than patients in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups (6.3 Gy vs. 9.8 Gy vs. 13.5 Gy, respectively; p = 0.011). Twenty patients (19.8%) showed disease recurrence, and seven patients (6.9%) died. The differences in the survival rates between RT groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In patients with TET who underwent adjuvant RT, PBT resulted in a lower dose of exposure to adjacent organs at risk. Survival outcomes for patients in PBT group were not significantly different from those in other groups.