根据术前规划准确恢复髋关节旋转中心与临床疗效改善无关

Surgeries Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.3390/surgeries4040065
S. Morgan, N. Amzallag, O. Shaked, N. Snir, A. Gold, I. Ashkenazi, S. Factor, Y. Warschawski
{"title":"根据术前规划准确恢复髋关节旋转中心与临床疗效改善无关","authors":"S. Morgan, N. Amzallag, O. Shaked, N. Snir, A. Gold, I. Ashkenazi, S. Factor, Y. Warschawski","doi":"10.3390/surgeries4040065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main objectives of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to recreate the center of rotation (COR). Accurate reconstruction of the COR is suggested to be within 5 mm of its anatomical location. The goal of our study was to assess whether accurate reconstruction of the COR, based on preoperative planning, is associated with improved clinical outcomes. The study population consisted of patients who underwent THA at our institution between August 2018 and May 2020. All patients underwent preoperative digital templating. The position of the predicted COR was compared to its actual postoperative position. Patients were subsequently stratified into two subgroups based on the difference between the distance of the predicted COR and the reconstructed COR, over or under 5 mm. A 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were taken for each patient. 90 patients were included in this study. 60 patients (66%) had their COR reconstructed within 5 mm of preoperative planning, whereas for 30 patients (33%), reconstruction was outside of 5 mm of preoperative planning. Between the two cohorts, no significant difference existed in the physical component summary (PCS) (p = 0.33), the mental component summary (MCS = 0.16), or the visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.12). The accurate restoration of COR based on preoperative planning is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. During postoperative evaluation, surgeons should feel confident if the COR is slightly greater than 5 mm of preoperative limitations.","PeriodicalId":93623,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate Restoration of the Center of Rotation of the Hip Joint Based on Preoperative Planning Is Not Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"S. Morgan, N. Amzallag, O. Shaked, N. Snir, A. Gold, I. Ashkenazi, S. Factor, Y. Warschawski\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/surgeries4040065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the main objectives of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to recreate the center of rotation (COR). Accurate reconstruction of the COR is suggested to be within 5 mm of its anatomical location. The goal of our study was to assess whether accurate reconstruction of the COR, based on preoperative planning, is associated with improved clinical outcomes. The study population consisted of patients who underwent THA at our institution between August 2018 and May 2020. All patients underwent preoperative digital templating. The position of the predicted COR was compared to its actual postoperative position. Patients were subsequently stratified into two subgroups based on the difference between the distance of the predicted COR and the reconstructed COR, over or under 5 mm. A 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were taken for each patient. 90 patients were included in this study. 60 patients (66%) had their COR reconstructed within 5 mm of preoperative planning, whereas for 30 patients (33%), reconstruction was outside of 5 mm of preoperative planning. Between the two cohorts, no significant difference existed in the physical component summary (PCS) (p = 0.33), the mental component summary (MCS = 0.16), or the visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.12). The accurate restoration of COR based on preoperative planning is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. During postoperative evaluation, surgeons should feel confident if the COR is slightly greater than 5 mm of preoperative limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4040065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4040065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全髋关节置换术(THA)的主要目标之一是重建旋转中心(COR)。准确重建的旋转中心应在其解剖位置的 5 毫米范围内。我们研究的目的是评估根据术前规划准确重建COR是否与临床疗效的改善相关。研究对象包括 2018 年 8 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在我院接受 THA 手术的患者。所有患者均接受了术前数字模板制作。将预测的 COR 位置与其术后的实际位置进行比较。随后,根据预测的COR与重建的COR之间的距离差异(大于或小于5毫米),将患者分为两个亚组。对每位患者进行了 12 项简表健康调查(SF-12)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。本研究共纳入 90 名患者。60名患者(66%)的COR重建在术前规划的5毫米以内,而30名患者(33%)的COR重建在术前规划的5毫米以外。两组患者的体力部分总结(PCS)(P = 0.33)、精神部分总结(MCS = 0.16)或视觉模拟量表(VAS)(P = 0.12)均无明显差异。根据术前规划准确恢复 COR 与临床结果的改善无关。在术后评估中,如果COR略大于术前限制的5毫米,外科医生就应该有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accurate Restoration of the Center of Rotation of the Hip Joint Based on Preoperative Planning Is Not Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes
One of the main objectives of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to recreate the center of rotation (COR). Accurate reconstruction of the COR is suggested to be within 5 mm of its anatomical location. The goal of our study was to assess whether accurate reconstruction of the COR, based on preoperative planning, is associated with improved clinical outcomes. The study population consisted of patients who underwent THA at our institution between August 2018 and May 2020. All patients underwent preoperative digital templating. The position of the predicted COR was compared to its actual postoperative position. Patients were subsequently stratified into two subgroups based on the difference between the distance of the predicted COR and the reconstructed COR, over or under 5 mm. A 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were taken for each patient. 90 patients were included in this study. 60 patients (66%) had their COR reconstructed within 5 mm of preoperative planning, whereas for 30 patients (33%), reconstruction was outside of 5 mm of preoperative planning. Between the two cohorts, no significant difference existed in the physical component summary (PCS) (p = 0.33), the mental component summary (MCS = 0.16), or the visual analogue scale (VAS) (p = 0.12). The accurate restoration of COR based on preoperative planning is not associated with improved clinical outcomes. During postoperative evaluation, surgeons should feel confident if the COR is slightly greater than 5 mm of preoperative limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
N-Acetylcysteine’s Potential Role in Prophylaxis and Treatment of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: From Evidence to Patient-Side Research Transversus Abdominis Plane with Rectus Sheath Blocks Versus Port Site Infiltration of Local Anaesthesia in Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy—Does It Reduce Postoperative Opiate Requirement? A Pilot Study Mechanisms of Degradation of Collagen or Gelatin Materials (Hemostatic Sponges) in Oral Surgery: A Systematic Review Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis in Adults: A Life-Threatening Emergency in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery The Influence of Root Prominence on the Onset of Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1