影响不同病房住院病人耐万古霉素肠球菌定植的因素

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_117_23
Yun-Cheng Wang, Lih-Shinn Wang, Tsung-Cheng Hsieh, Hui-Chun Chung
{"title":"影响不同病房住院病人耐万古霉素肠球菌定植的因素","authors":"Yun-Cheng Wang, Lih-Shinn Wang, Tsung-Cheng Hsieh, Hui-Chun Chung","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_117_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus\n faecium (VRE) infection at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan rose to 80.6%, exceeding the average prevalence of 55.6% among all medical centers nationwide during the same period. In recent years, the number of cases of VRE infection detected among hospitalized patients has increased annually. However, most of these patients in different wards are asymptomatic carriers. Therefore, restricting active screening to high-risk units will not improve the current situation, and it is necessary to review the risk factors for VRE colonization to provide a reference for future infection control policies.\n \n \n \n Between 2014 and 2019, there were 3188 VRE-positive cultures reported at our institution, as per the electronic medical records system.\n \n \n \n In the medical and surgical wards, patients who received penicillin (odds ratios [ORs]: 2.84 and 4.16, respectively) and third-generation cephalosporins (ORs: 3.17 and 6.19, respectively) were at higher risk of VRE colonization. In intensive care units, the use of carbapenems (OR: 2.08) was the most significant variable.\n \n \n \n This study demonstrated that the risk factors for VRE colonization differed between wards. Thus, policies should be established according to the attributes of patients in each ward, and active screening tests should be performed according to individual risks, instead of a policy for comprehensive mass screening.\n","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization of in-hospital patients in different wards\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Cheng Wang, Lih-Shinn Wang, Tsung-Cheng Hsieh, Hui-Chun Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_117_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n The prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus\\n faecium (VRE) infection at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan rose to 80.6%, exceeding the average prevalence of 55.6% among all medical centers nationwide during the same period. In recent years, the number of cases of VRE infection detected among hospitalized patients has increased annually. However, most of these patients in different wards are asymptomatic carriers. Therefore, restricting active screening to high-risk units will not improve the current situation, and it is necessary to review the risk factors for VRE colonization to provide a reference for future infection control policies.\\n \\n \\n \\n Between 2014 and 2019, there were 3188 VRE-positive cultures reported at our institution, as per the electronic medical records system.\\n \\n \\n \\n In the medical and surgical wards, patients who received penicillin (odds ratios [ORs]: 2.84 and 4.16, respectively) and third-generation cephalosporins (ORs: 3.17 and 6.19, respectively) were at higher risk of VRE colonization. In intensive care units, the use of carbapenems (OR: 2.08) was the most significant variable.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study demonstrated that the risk factors for VRE colonization differed between wards. Thus, policies should be established according to the attributes of patients in each ward, and active screening tests should be performed according to individual risks, instead of a policy for comprehensive mass screening.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_117_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_117_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 台湾东部某医疗中心耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)感染率高达 80.6%,超过同期全国医疗中心 55.6% 的平均感染率。近年来,在住院病人中发现的 VRE 感染病例逐年增加。然而,这些住在不同病房的患者大多是无症状的病毒携带者。因此,仅限于对高风险病房进行主动筛查并不能改善目前的状况,有必要重新审视VRE定植的风险因素,为今后的感染控制政策提供参考。 根据电子病历系统显示,2014 年至 2019 年期间,我院共报告了 3188 例 VRE 阳性培养。 在内科和外科病房,使用青霉素(几率比 [ORs]:分别为 2.84 和 4.16)和第三代头孢菌素(ORs:分别为 3.17 和 6.19)的患者出现 VRE 定植的风险较高。在重症监护病房,使用碳青霉烯类(OR:2.08)是最重要的变量。 这项研究表明,不同病房的 VRE 定植风险因素各不相同。因此,应根据每个病房患者的属性制定相应的政策,并根据个体风险进行积极的筛查测试,而不是制定全面的大规模筛查政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors affecting vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium colonization of in-hospital patients in different wards
ABSTRACT The prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) infection at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan rose to 80.6%, exceeding the average prevalence of 55.6% among all medical centers nationwide during the same period. In recent years, the number of cases of VRE infection detected among hospitalized patients has increased annually. However, most of these patients in different wards are asymptomatic carriers. Therefore, restricting active screening to high-risk units will not improve the current situation, and it is necessary to review the risk factors for VRE colonization to provide a reference for future infection control policies. Between 2014 and 2019, there were 3188 VRE-positive cultures reported at our institution, as per the electronic medical records system. In the medical and surgical wards, patients who received penicillin (odds ratios [ORs]: 2.84 and 4.16, respectively) and third-generation cephalosporins (ORs: 3.17 and 6.19, respectively) were at higher risk of VRE colonization. In intensive care units, the use of carbapenems (OR: 2.08) was the most significant variable. This study demonstrated that the risk factors for VRE colonization differed between wards. Thus, policies should be established according to the attributes of patients in each ward, and active screening tests should be performed according to individual risks, instead of a policy for comprehensive mass screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic modification in radiotherapy and immunotherapy for cancers. Natural phytochemicals as small-molecule proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia. Unraveling the interplay between inflammation and stem cell mobilization or homing: Implications for tissue repair and therapeutics. Evaluating the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy in the management of endophthalmitis after following the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1