部门专业学习社区和教师领导力如何影响教师的自我效能感?多层次分析

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Professional Capital and Community Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1108/jpcc-07-2023-0051
Xin Zheng, Ying Luo
{"title":"部门专业学习社区和教师领导力如何影响教师的自我效能感?多层次分析","authors":"Xin Zheng, Ying Luo","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-07-2023-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWhilst professional learning communities (PLCs) have been widely explored at the school level, they have received less attention at the departmental level. The study takes the variance between departments and the role of departmental teacher leaders into consideration, and the relationships amongst departmental-level PLC dimensions, two types of teacher leadership (TL) and individual teacher self-efficacy are investigated.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 907 teachers from 81 departments in Chinese schools. The associations between the studied variables were explored through a multi-level analysis approach.FindingsThe results show that two specific characteristics of departmental PLCs, namely reflective dialogue (RD) and collective responsibility (CR), exhibit a positive correlation with individual teacher self-efficacy. Additionally, the findings indicate that teacher transformational leadership significantly predicts teacher self-efficacy, whereas teacher instructional leadership (IL) does not emerge as a significant predictor. These findings may be attributed to the contextual factors of Chinese teachers' collective work and the practice of teacher leaders.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the existing literature by addressing the variance between departments and uncovering the impacts of departmental PLC dimensions on individual teachers. Furthermore, two TL styles at the departmental level are differentiated, and their distinct influences on teacher self-efficacy are further analysed.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":"37 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do departmental professional learning communities and teacher leadership matter for teacher self-efficacy? A multi-level analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xin Zheng, Ying Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpcc-07-2023-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeWhilst professional learning communities (PLCs) have been widely explored at the school level, they have received less attention at the departmental level. The study takes the variance between departments and the role of departmental teacher leaders into consideration, and the relationships amongst departmental-level PLC dimensions, two types of teacher leadership (TL) and individual teacher self-efficacy are investigated.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 907 teachers from 81 departments in Chinese schools. The associations between the studied variables were explored through a multi-level analysis approach.FindingsThe results show that two specific characteristics of departmental PLCs, namely reflective dialogue (RD) and collective responsibility (CR), exhibit a positive correlation with individual teacher self-efficacy. Additionally, the findings indicate that teacher transformational leadership significantly predicts teacher self-efficacy, whereas teacher instructional leadership (IL) does not emerge as a significant predictor. These findings may be attributed to the contextual factors of Chinese teachers' collective work and the practice of teacher leaders.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the existing literature by addressing the variance between departments and uncovering the impacts of departmental PLC dimensions on individual teachers. Furthermore, two TL styles at the departmental level are differentiated, and their distinct influences on teacher self-efficacy are further analysed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-07-2023-0051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-07-2023-0051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 虽然专业学习社区(PLC)在学校层面得到了广泛的探讨,但在部门层面却较少受到关注。本研究考虑了系部之间的差异和系部教师领导的作用,探讨了系部层面的 PLC 维度、两种类型的教师领导(TL)和教师个体自我效能感之间的关系。研究结果表明,部门 PLC 的两个具体特征,即反思性对话(RD)和集体责任(CR),与教师个体自我效能感呈正相关。此外,研究结果表明,教师的变革型领导对教师的自我效能感有显著的预测作用,而教师的教学型领导(IL)对教师的自我效能感没有显著的预测作用。这些发现可能归因于中国教师集体工作的情境因素和教师领导的实践。此外,研究还区分了部门层面的两种教师领导风格,并进一步分析了它们对教师自我效能感的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do departmental professional learning communities and teacher leadership matter for teacher self-efficacy? A multi-level analysis
PurposeWhilst professional learning communities (PLCs) have been widely explored at the school level, they have received less attention at the departmental level. The study takes the variance between departments and the role of departmental teacher leaders into consideration, and the relationships amongst departmental-level PLC dimensions, two types of teacher leadership (TL) and individual teacher self-efficacy are investigated.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consisted of 907 teachers from 81 departments in Chinese schools. The associations between the studied variables were explored through a multi-level analysis approach.FindingsThe results show that two specific characteristics of departmental PLCs, namely reflective dialogue (RD) and collective responsibility (CR), exhibit a positive correlation with individual teacher self-efficacy. Additionally, the findings indicate that teacher transformational leadership significantly predicts teacher self-efficacy, whereas teacher instructional leadership (IL) does not emerge as a significant predictor. These findings may be attributed to the contextual factors of Chinese teachers' collective work and the practice of teacher leaders.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the existing literature by addressing the variance between departments and uncovering the impacts of departmental PLC dimensions on individual teachers. Furthermore, two TL styles at the departmental level are differentiated, and their distinct influences on teacher self-efficacy are further analysed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A call to adopt pedagogies of optimism in times of armed conflicts: theoretical and practical insights Learning with and from each other: creating safe spaces in a professional community for school leadership development How teachers enhance ICT integration practices within professional learning communities: a qualitative study in Tanzania The unbearable lightness of being implicated in conflict-affected societies: can teachers do anything about it? Educational leadership during a time of war in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1