{"title":"曲妥珠单抗联合帕妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的元分析研究","authors":"Qingdong Gao, Xufang Duan","doi":"10.1155/2023/2274965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741), \n \n P\n \n < 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856), \n \n P\n \n < 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869), \n \n P\n \n = 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease (\n \n P\n \n > 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437), \n \n P\n \n < 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494), \n \n P\n \n < 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"5 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Combined with Pertuzumab for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Study of Randomized Control Trials\",\"authors\":\"Qingdong Gao, Xufang Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2274965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741), \\n \\n P\\n \\n < 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856), \\n \\n P\\n \\n < 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869), \\n \\n P\\n \\n = 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease (\\n \\n P\\n \\n > 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437), \\n \\n P\\n \\n < 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494), \\n \\n P\\n \\n < 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2274965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2274965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的。本系统综述旨在评估曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌(BC)的有效性和安全性。研究方法对PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网和万方数据库进行了全面检索。纳入了自数据库建立至2022年10月期间所有关于曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌的随机对照试验。使用 STATA 17.0 软件对纳入的文献进行了荟萃分析。结果。共纳入8项研究,涉及7628名患者,包括治疗组和对照组各3814名患者。荟萃分析结果显示,治疗组(曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗)的中位无进展生存期比对照组(安慰剂)短得多(OR = 0.656,95% CI (0.581, 0.741),P 0.05)。然而,治疗组的皮疹发生率远高于对照组(OR = 1.915,95% CI (1.505,2.437),P <0.001)。治疗组患者发生严重不良反应的风险明显高于对照组(OR = 1.342,95% CI (1.206, 1.494),P < 0.001)。结论曲妥珠单抗和百妥珠单抗联合治疗不能有效改善患者的中期无进展生存期。然而,包括腹泻和皮疹在内的不良反应是目前推广这种联合疗法的限制因素。
Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Combined with Pertuzumab for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Study of Randomized Control Trials
Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741),
P
< 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856),
P
< 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869),
P
= 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease (
P
> 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437),
P
< 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494),
P
< 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including:
Rational therapeutics
Evidence-based practice
Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs
Drug interactions
Clinical impact of drug formulations
Pharmacogenetics
Personalised, stratified and translational medicine
Clinical pharmacokinetics.