曲妥珠单抗联合帕妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的元分析研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1155/2023/2274965
Qingdong Gao, Xufang Duan
{"title":"曲妥珠单抗联合帕妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2阳性乳腺癌的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的元分析研究","authors":"Qingdong Gao, Xufang Duan","doi":"10.1155/2023/2274965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741), \n \n P\n \n  < 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856), \n \n P\n \n  < 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869), \n \n P\n \n  = 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease (\n \n P\n \n  > 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437), \n \n P\n \n  < 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494), \n \n P\n \n  < 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"5 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Combined with Pertuzumab for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Study of Randomized Control Trials\",\"authors\":\"Qingdong Gao, Xufang Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2274965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741), \\n \\n P\\n \\n  < 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856), \\n \\n P\\n \\n  < 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869), \\n \\n P\\n \\n  = 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease (\\n \\n P\\n \\n  > 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437), \\n \\n P\\n \\n  < 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494), \\n \\n P\\n \\n  < 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2274965\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2274965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。本系统综述旨在评估曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体-2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌(BC)的有效性和安全性。研究方法对PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网和万方数据库进行了全面检索。纳入了自数据库建立至2022年10月期间所有关于曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌的随机对照试验。使用 STATA 17.0 软件对纳入的文献进行了荟萃分析。结果。共纳入8项研究,涉及7628名患者,包括治疗组和对照组各3814名患者。荟萃分析结果显示,治疗组(曲妥珠单抗联合百妥珠单抗)的中位无进展生存期比对照组(安慰剂)短得多(OR = 0.656,95% CI (0.581, 0.741),P 0.05)。然而,治疗组的皮疹发生率远高于对照组(OR = 1.915,95% CI (1.505,2.437),P <0.001)。治疗组患者发生严重不良反应的风险明显高于对照组(OR = 1.342,95% CI (1.206, 1.494),P < 0.001)。结论曲妥珠单抗和百妥珠单抗联合治疗不能有效改善患者的中期无进展生存期。然而,包括腹泻和皮疹在内的不良反应是目前推广这种联合疗法的限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Combined with Pertuzumab for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Study of Randomized Control Trials
Objective. This systematic review was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases was conducted. All randomized controlled trials on trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab for HER2-positive BC from the time of database construction to October 2022 were included. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Results. A total of 8 studies were included, involving a total of 7628 patients, including 3814 patients in the treatment group and 3814 patients in the control groups. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the median progression-free survival was much shorter in the treatment group (trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab) than in the control group (placebo) (OR = 0.656, 95% CI (0.581, 0.741), P  < 0.001) and that patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more cases of diarrhea than those in the control group (OR = 2.429, 95% CI (2.065, 2.856), P  < 0.001) while experiencing significantly less cases of constipation (OR = 0.641, 95% CI (0.473, 0.869), P  = 0.004). Notably, the incidence of nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of systemic adverse effects such as neutropenia, fatigue, myalgia, and cardiac disease ( P  > 0.05). However, the treatment group had a much higher incidence of rash than the control group (OR = 1.915, 95% CI (1.505, 2.437), P  < 0.001). The risk of serious adverse reactions was markedly higher in patients in the treatment group than that in the control group (OR = 1.342, 95% CI (1.206, 1.494), P  < 0.001). Conclusion. The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab was not effective in improving the intermediate progression-free survival of patients. However, adverse effects, including diarrhea and rash, are the limiting factors for the current promotion of this combination method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
期刊最新文献
Medication Errors: An Update From the Central Region of Ghana Synergistic Inhibitory Effect of Gliquidone Against Cisplatin-Resistant Human Lung Adenocarcinoma TH-302: A Highly Selective Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug for Treating PARP Inhibitor–Resistant Cancers Potential Role of APC Mutations in the Prognosis and Targeted Therapy of Gastric Adenocarcinoma The Evaluation for Expandable Applications of Tislelizumab in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1