临床试验失败的原因:回顾

S. Chaudhry, Abhijit Trailokya
{"title":"临床试验失败的原因:回顾","authors":"S. Chaudhry, Abhijit Trailokya","doi":"10.46610/jctr.2023.v05i02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical Trials are often labelled as failure or negative when the anticipated results are not observed. The negative results can be due to multiple factors such as primary and secondary endpoints not being met higher incidence of adverse reactions, and sluggish recruitment of trial subjects due to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, higher dropout rates due to changed biochemical parameters such as raised liver or hepatic enzymes. Trial Failures are reported globally but within developing countries, the reports are meagre. Inclusion in trials imposes a financial burden on patients and hence dropout rates proportionately increase. Recruitment of patients is often better in open trials as compared to blind studies as drug awareness imposes better confidence in the recruited subjects. The oncology trials that use biomarkers in patient selection have higher overall success probabilities than trials without biomarkers. Complexities in drug development and the inherent uncertainties in medical research also play an important role in a high rate of clinical trial failures.","PeriodicalId":73671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials and regulations","volume":"49 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis of Clinical Trial Failure: A Review\",\"authors\":\"S. Chaudhry, Abhijit Trailokya\",\"doi\":\"10.46610/jctr.2023.v05i02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical Trials are often labelled as failure or negative when the anticipated results are not observed. The negative results can be due to multiple factors such as primary and secondary endpoints not being met higher incidence of adverse reactions, and sluggish recruitment of trial subjects due to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, higher dropout rates due to changed biochemical parameters such as raised liver or hepatic enzymes. Trial Failures are reported globally but within developing countries, the reports are meagre. Inclusion in trials imposes a financial burden on patients and hence dropout rates proportionately increase. Recruitment of patients is often better in open trials as compared to blind studies as drug awareness imposes better confidence in the recruited subjects. The oncology trials that use biomarkers in patient selection have higher overall success probabilities than trials without biomarkers. Complexities in drug development and the inherent uncertainties in medical research also play an important role in a high rate of clinical trial failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical trials and regulations\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical trials and regulations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46610/jctr.2023.v05i02.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials and regulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46610/jctr.2023.v05i02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当临床试验没有达到预期结果时,通常会被称为失败或负面结果。负面结果可能由多种因素造成,如主要和次要终点未达到,不良反应发生率较高,严格的纳入和排除标准导致受试者招募缓慢,生化指标变化(如肝酶或肝酶升高)导致辍学率较高。全球都有试验失败的报告,但发展中国家的报告很少。纳入试验会给患者带来经济负担,因此辍学率也会相应增加。与盲法研究相比,公开试验通常能更好地招募患者,因为对药物的认识能增强被招募者的信心。与不使用生物标志物的试验相比,使用生物标志物选择患者的肿瘤试验的总体成功概率更高。药物开发的复杂性和医学研究固有的不确定性也是导致临床试验失败率高的重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genesis of Clinical Trial Failure: A Review
Clinical Trials are often labelled as failure or negative when the anticipated results are not observed. The negative results can be due to multiple factors such as primary and secondary endpoints not being met higher incidence of adverse reactions, and sluggish recruitment of trial subjects due to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, higher dropout rates due to changed biochemical parameters such as raised liver or hepatic enzymes. Trial Failures are reported globally but within developing countries, the reports are meagre. Inclusion in trials imposes a financial burden on patients and hence dropout rates proportionately increase. Recruitment of patients is often better in open trials as compared to blind studies as drug awareness imposes better confidence in the recruited subjects. The oncology trials that use biomarkers in patient selection have higher overall success probabilities than trials without biomarkers. Complexities in drug development and the inherent uncertainties in medical research also play an important role in a high rate of clinical trial failures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genesis of Clinical Trial Failure: A Review Medico-Legal Cases: An Overview In Silico Exploration of Dietary Polyphenol, Bisdemethoxycurcumin as a Potential CXCL12 Inhibitor in Breast Cancer Treatment Gel of Betel (Areca Catechu Linn.) Nut Ethanol Extract Activity Test as Cuts Healing against Diabetic Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) A Review on Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1