俄乌战争的虚假信息反应

KOME Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.17646/kome.of.2
J. Baptista, Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, Anabela Gradim, Marlene Loureiro
{"title":"俄乌战争的虚假信息反应","authors":"J. Baptista, Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, Anabela Gradim, Marlene Loureiro","doi":"10.17646/kome.of.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The beginning of the war in Ukraine generated a wave of disinformation in Europe. Our research intends to cognise the reaction of disinformation agents to the outbreak of war, analysing publications checked by Iberian fact-checkers during the first ten days of the conflict. Specifically, we used Voyant Tools online software to perform a quantitative textual analysis, which allowed us to survey the most relevant topics, formats for spreading disinformation and media platforms. We also analysed the presence of political leaders, countries and military terminologies. Our findings indicate that video is the most common format to disseminate disinformation content, namely, to illustrate war scenarios. In addition, our research also showed that online video platforms, especially YouTube, are closer to terms that portray military actions. This may have implications for fostering a warmongering feeling. Finally, we found that the fake content checked was mostly favourable to Ukraine, which raises new poignant arguments for the contemporary debate about disinformation in war.","PeriodicalId":501550,"journal":{"name":"KOME","volume":"43 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Disinformation Reaction to the Russia–Ukraine War\",\"authors\":\"J. Baptista, Rubén Rivas-de-Roca, Anabela Gradim, Marlene Loureiro\",\"doi\":\"10.17646/kome.of.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The beginning of the war in Ukraine generated a wave of disinformation in Europe. Our research intends to cognise the reaction of disinformation agents to the outbreak of war, analysing publications checked by Iberian fact-checkers during the first ten days of the conflict. Specifically, we used Voyant Tools online software to perform a quantitative textual analysis, which allowed us to survey the most relevant topics, formats for spreading disinformation and media platforms. We also analysed the presence of political leaders, countries and military terminologies. Our findings indicate that video is the most common format to disseminate disinformation content, namely, to illustrate war scenarios. In addition, our research also showed that online video platforms, especially YouTube, are closer to terms that portray military actions. This may have implications for fostering a warmongering feeling. Finally, we found that the fake content checked was mostly favourable to Ukraine, which raises new poignant arguments for the contemporary debate about disinformation in war.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KOME\",\"volume\":\"43 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KOME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.of.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KOME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.of.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乌克兰战争爆发后,欧洲掀起了一股虚假信息浪潮。我们的研究旨在了解虚假信息传播者对战争爆发的反应,分析伊比利亚事实核查员在冲突爆发后头十天内核查过的出版物。具体而言,我们使用 Voyant Tools 在线软件进行了定量文本分析,从而调查了最相关的主题、传播虚假信息的形式和媒体平台。我们还分析了政治领导人、国家和军事术语的存在。我们的研究结果表明,视频是传播虚假信息内容最常见的形式,即展示战争场景。此外,我们的研究还表明,在线视频平台,尤其是 YouTube,更接近于描绘军事行动的术语。这可能会产生助长战争贩子情绪的影响。最后,我们发现所检查的虚假内容大多对乌克兰有利,这为当代关于战争中虚假信息的辩论提出了新的有力论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Disinformation Reaction to the Russia–Ukraine War
The beginning of the war in Ukraine generated a wave of disinformation in Europe. Our research intends to cognise the reaction of disinformation agents to the outbreak of war, analysing publications checked by Iberian fact-checkers during the first ten days of the conflict. Specifically, we used Voyant Tools online software to perform a quantitative textual analysis, which allowed us to survey the most relevant topics, formats for spreading disinformation and media platforms. We also analysed the presence of political leaders, countries and military terminologies. Our findings indicate that video is the most common format to disseminate disinformation content, namely, to illustrate war scenarios. In addition, our research also showed that online video platforms, especially YouTube, are closer to terms that portray military actions. This may have implications for fostering a warmongering feeling. Finally, we found that the fake content checked was mostly favourable to Ukraine, which raises new poignant arguments for the contemporary debate about disinformation in war.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns and Actors of Disinformation: Analysis of Debunked Hoaxes in Spain in 2022 Stigmatisation or Destigmatisation? Social Media Influencers Defined by Adolescents The Disinformation Reaction to the Russia–Ukraine War Political influencers/leaders on Twitter. An analysis of the Spanish digital and media agendas in the context of the Catalan elections of 21 December 2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1