用于治疗食管憩室的口周内窥镜肌切开术:隧道式前移

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tige.2023.12.003
Matt Pelton , Michel Kahaleh , Amy Tyberg
{"title":"用于治疗食管憩室的口周内窥镜肌切开术:隧道式前移","authors":"Matt Pelton ,&nbsp;Michel Kahaleh ,&nbsp;Amy Tyberg","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy<span><span> (D-POEM) has emerged as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective option for Zenker's diverticula<span> (ZDs) and several other types of esophageal diverticula<span>. D-POEM involves submucosal dissection to create tunnels on the luminal and diverticular aspects of the diverticular septum, allowing for precise visualization of the septum. The operator then performs a myotomy, releasing the diverticula and reconnecting the diverticular and esophageal lumens. Approaches for D-POEM vary on the basis of the location of the initial </span></span></span>incision<span> for the submucosal dissection; in the long D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection 1-2 cm above the septum, whereas in the ultra-short D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection directly on the septum. Observational studies and systematic reviews demonstrate consistent technical success (93.4%-100%), high clinical success (87.1%-94.1%), few adverse events (4.6%-16.9%), and low recurrence rates (0.9%-4.4%). Meta-analyses of observational studies comparing D-POEM with surgical approaches (flexible endoscopic septotomy and rigid endoscopic septotomy) have found that D-POEM may have higher rates of clinical success (RR 1.13, CI 1.05-1.22 and RR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.18) with comparable technical success, adverse event, and recurrence rates. However, further rigorous prospective and randomized trials are warranted. Early comparisons of the ultra-short and long approaches to D-POEM have not found significant differences in efficacy. Outside of ZD, D-POEM should be further investigated for Killian-Jamieson, epiphrenic, and Rokitansky diverticula</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 56-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Management of Esophageal Diverticula: Tunneling Forward\",\"authors\":\"Matt Pelton ,&nbsp;Michel Kahaleh ,&nbsp;Amy Tyberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tige.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy<span><span> (D-POEM) has emerged as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective option for Zenker's diverticula<span> (ZDs) and several other types of esophageal diverticula<span>. D-POEM involves submucosal dissection to create tunnels on the luminal and diverticular aspects of the diverticular septum, allowing for precise visualization of the septum. The operator then performs a myotomy, releasing the diverticula and reconnecting the diverticular and esophageal lumens. Approaches for D-POEM vary on the basis of the location of the initial </span></span></span>incision<span> for the submucosal dissection; in the long D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection 1-2 cm above the septum, whereas in the ultra-short D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection directly on the septum. Observational studies and systematic reviews demonstrate consistent technical success (93.4%-100%), high clinical success (87.1%-94.1%), few adverse events (4.6%-16.9%), and low recurrence rates (0.9%-4.4%). Meta-analyses of observational studies comparing D-POEM with surgical approaches (flexible endoscopic septotomy and rigid endoscopic septotomy) have found that D-POEM may have higher rates of clinical success (RR 1.13, CI 1.05-1.22 and RR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.18) with comparable technical success, adverse event, and recurrence rates. However, further rigorous prospective and randomized trials are warranted. Early comparisons of the ultra-short and long approaches to D-POEM have not found significant differences in efficacy. Outside of ZD, D-POEM should be further investigated for Killian-Jamieson, epiphrenic, and Rokitansky diverticula</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 56-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072300079X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259003072300079X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

憩室口周内镜下肌切开术(D-POEM)已成为一种微创、安全、有效的治疗 Zenker 食管憩室(ZDs)和其他几种食管憩室的方法。D-POEM 包括粘膜下剥离,在憩室隔膜的管腔和憩室方面创建隧道,以便精确观察憩室隔膜。然后,操作者进行肌层切开术,释放憩室并重新连接憩室和食管管腔。D-POEM 方法因粘膜下剥离初始切口的位置不同而各异;在长 D-POEM 方法中,操作者在隔膜上方 1-2 厘米处开始粘膜下剥离,而在超短 D-POEM 方法中,操作者直接在隔膜上开始粘膜下剥离。观察性研究和系统性综述显示了一致的技术成功率(93.4%-100%)、较高的临床成功率(87.1%-94.1%)、较少的不良事件(4.6%-16.9%)和较低的复发率(0.9%-4.4%)。将 D-POEM 与外科手术方法(柔性内窥镜隔膜切除术和刚性内窥镜隔膜切除术)进行比较的观察性研究的 Meta 分析发现,D-POEM 的临床成功率可能更高(RR 1.13,CI 1.05-1.22 和 RR 1.11,CI 1.03-1.18),而技术成功率、不良事件和复发率相当。不过,还需要进一步进行严格的前瞻性随机试验。早期对 D-POEM 的超短和超长方法进行的比较并未发现疗效上的显著差异。除 ZD 外,应进一步研究 D-POEM 对 Killian-Jamieson、虹吸管憩室和 Rokitansky 憩室的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Management of Esophageal Diverticula: Tunneling Forward

Diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy (D-POEM) has emerged as a minimally invasive, safe, and effective option for Zenker's diverticula (ZDs) and several other types of esophageal diverticula. D-POEM involves submucosal dissection to create tunnels on the luminal and diverticular aspects of the diverticular septum, allowing for precise visualization of the septum. The operator then performs a myotomy, releasing the diverticula and reconnecting the diverticular and esophageal lumens. Approaches for D-POEM vary on the basis of the location of the initial incision for the submucosal dissection; in the long D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection 1-2 cm above the septum, whereas in the ultra-short D-POEM approach, operators begin submucosal dissection directly on the septum. Observational studies and systematic reviews demonstrate consistent technical success (93.4%-100%), high clinical success (87.1%-94.1%), few adverse events (4.6%-16.9%), and low recurrence rates (0.9%-4.4%). Meta-analyses of observational studies comparing D-POEM with surgical approaches (flexible endoscopic septotomy and rigid endoscopic septotomy) have found that D-POEM may have higher rates of clinical success (RR 1.13, CI 1.05-1.22 and RR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.18) with comparable technical success, adverse event, and recurrence rates. However, further rigorous prospective and randomized trials are warranted. Early comparisons of the ultra-short and long approaches to D-POEM have not found significant differences in efficacy. Outside of ZD, D-POEM should be further investigated for Killian-Jamieson, epiphrenic, and Rokitansky diverticula

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Repair for Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks Is Associated With a High Rate of Leak Resolution The Endoscopic Role and Indications of Through-the-Scope Tack and Suture System for Gastrointestinal Closure Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage With 2 Stents Versus 1 Stent Reduces Reinterventions: A Multicenter Study Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1