{"title":"二分法","authors":"I. Narița","doi":"10.2478/saec-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.","PeriodicalId":42120,"journal":{"name":"SAECULUM","volume":"238 ","pages":"26 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dichotomy\",\"authors\":\"I. Narița\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/saec-2023-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAECULUM\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"26 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAECULUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2023-0015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAECULUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2023-0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Among Zeno paradoxes the most known are Dichotomy, Achilles, Arrow, and Stadium. These argumentations state that movement is impossible since it is not thinkable. According to the ascendant form of dichotomy, a mobile cannot touch its destination since it always must to reach the half of the distance. The solutions of Diogenes, Aristotle and mathematical analysis are not satisfactory. Finally, the difference between rest and movement can be only conventionally established.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
