{"title":"食品、膳食补充剂、宠物食品和动物饲料中的高效阴离子交换色谱法与脉冲安培检测法的糖谱分析方法:实验室间验证研究,最终行动 2018.16。","authors":"Andrew J Ruosch, David J Ellingson","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A method for sugar profile analysis granted First Action 2018.16 was subjected to a multi-laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perform a multi-laboratory study with this method to determine the performance parameters of repeatability and reproducibility against the AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirements (AOAC SMPR 2018.001) for Final Action status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven laboratories from three different countries participated in the study. Each laboratory was provided practice materials for successful method setup. Each laboratory then proceeded with analysis of blind duplicates of 10 different products covering the scope of the method. Results were reported to the study directors with any modifications and assessed following the procedures of Appendix D of the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (guidelines for collaborative study procedures).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of results from the study met the SMPR requirements. The data is presented along with any outlying observations or modifications. The method was proven to be flexible across different instrumentation and laboratories, and the method was updated to provide further system suitability and guidelines to maintain the performance of the method across the large scope of matrixes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from the collaborative study supported the method for Final Action status. The Expert Review Panel reviewed and voted to move the method forward to Final Action and was followed by review from the Official Methods Board and granted approval.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The method was granted Final Action Official Methods status.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sugar Profile Method by High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection in Food, Dietary Supplements, Pet Food, and Animal Feeds: Interlaboratory Validation Study, Final Action 2018.16.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J Ruosch, David J Ellingson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A method for sugar profile analysis granted First Action 2018.16 was subjected to a multi-laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perform a multi-laboratory study with this method to determine the performance parameters of repeatability and reproducibility against the AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirements (AOAC SMPR 2018.001) for Final Action status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven laboratories from three different countries participated in the study. Each laboratory was provided practice materials for successful method setup. Each laboratory then proceeded with analysis of blind duplicates of 10 different products covering the scope of the method. Results were reported to the study directors with any modifications and assessed following the procedures of Appendix D of the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (guidelines for collaborative study procedures).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of results from the study met the SMPR requirements. The data is presented along with any outlying observations or modifications. The method was proven to be flexible across different instrumentation and laboratories, and the method was updated to provide further system suitability and guidelines to maintain the performance of the method across the large scope of matrixes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from the collaborative study supported the method for Final Action status. The Expert Review Panel reviewed and voted to move the method forward to Final Action and was followed by review from the Official Methods Board and granted approval.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The method was granted Final Action Official Methods status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"303-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对获得2018.16号第一个行动批准的糖剖面分析方法进行了多实验室研究:对该方法进行多实验室研究,以确定其重复性和再现性的性能参数是否符合 AOAC 标准方法性能要求(AOAC SMPR 2018.001),从而获得最终行动资格:来自三个不同国家的 11 家实验室参与了这项研究。每个实验室都获得了成功建立方法的练习材料。然后,每个实验室对涵盖方法范围的 10 种不同产品进行盲法重复分析。按照 AOAC 官方分析方法 SM 附录 D 的程序(合作研究程序指南),向研究负责人报告结果及任何修改和评估:结果:大部分研究结果都符合 SMPR 的要求。数据连同任何偏离的观察结果或修改都一并列出。该方法在不同的仪器和实验室中被证明是灵活的,并且该方法已被更新,以提供进一步的系统适用性和指南,从而在大量基质中保持该方法的性能:结论:合作研究的结果支持该方法进入最终行动阶段。专家评审小组审查并投票决定将该方法推进到最终行动阶段,随后由正式方法委员会进行审查并批准:该方法被授予 "最终行动 "正式方法 SM 地位。
Sugar Profile Method by High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection in Food, Dietary Supplements, Pet Food, and Animal Feeds: Interlaboratory Validation Study, Final Action 2018.16.
Background: A method for sugar profile analysis granted First Action 2018.16 was subjected to a multi-laboratory study.
Objective: Perform a multi-laboratory study with this method to determine the performance parameters of repeatability and reproducibility against the AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirements (AOAC SMPR 2018.001) for Final Action status.
Methods: Eleven laboratories from three different countries participated in the study. Each laboratory was provided practice materials for successful method setup. Each laboratory then proceeded with analysis of blind duplicates of 10 different products covering the scope of the method. Results were reported to the study directors with any modifications and assessed following the procedures of Appendix D of the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (guidelines for collaborative study procedures).
Results: The majority of results from the study met the SMPR requirements. The data is presented along with any outlying observations or modifications. The method was proven to be flexible across different instrumentation and laboratories, and the method was updated to provide further system suitability and guidelines to maintain the performance of the method across the large scope of matrixes.
Conclusion: The results from the collaborative study supported the method for Final Action status. The Expert Review Panel reviewed and voted to move the method forward to Final Action and was followed by review from the Official Methods Board and granted approval.
Highlights: The method was granted Final Action Official Methods status.