医护人员在基层医疗机构和疗养院提供姑息关怀时遇到的障碍:一项调查研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524231216994
Katrin Kochems, Everlien de Graaf, Ginette M Hesselmann, Marieke J E Ausems, Saskia C C M Teunissen
{"title":"医护人员在基层医疗机构和疗养院提供姑息关怀时遇到的障碍:一项调查研究。","authors":"Katrin Kochems, Everlien de Graaf, Ginette M Hesselmann, Marieke J E Ausems, Saskia C C M Teunissen","doi":"10.1177/26323524231216994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care in primary care and nursing home settings is becoming increasingly important. A multidimensional palliative care approach, provided by a multiprofessional team, is essential to meeting patients' and relatives' values, wishes, and needs. Factors that hamper the provision of palliative care in this context have not yet been fully explored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the barriers to providing palliative care for patients at home or in nursing homes as perceived by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of nurses, doctors, chaplains, and rehabilitation therapists working in primary care and at nursing homes in the Netherlands is used. The primary outcome is barriers, defined as statements with ⩾20% negative response. The survey contained 56 statements on palliative reasoning, communication, and multiprofessional collaboration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 249 healthcare professionals completed the survey (66% completion rate). The main barriers identified in the provision of palliative care were the use of measurement tools (43%), consultation of an expert (31%), estimation of life expectancy (29%), and documentation in the electronic health record (21% and 37%). In primary care, mainly organizational barriers were identified, whereas in nursing homes, most barriers were related to care content. Chaplains and rehabilitation therapists perceived the most barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primary care and nursing homes, there are barriers to the provision of palliative care. The provision of palliative care depends on the identification of patients with palliative care needs and is influenced by individual healthcare professionals, possibilities for consultation, and the electronic health record. An unambiguous and systematic approach within the multiprofessional team is needed, which should be patient-driven and tailored to the setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers in providing palliative care in primary care and nursing homes: a survey study.\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Kochems, Everlien de Graaf, Ginette M Hesselmann, Marieke J E Ausems, Saskia C C M Teunissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524231216994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care in primary care and nursing home settings is becoming increasingly important. A multidimensional palliative care approach, provided by a multiprofessional team, is essential to meeting patients' and relatives' values, wishes, and needs. Factors that hamper the provision of palliative care in this context have not yet been fully explored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the barriers to providing palliative care for patients at home or in nursing homes as perceived by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of nurses, doctors, chaplains, and rehabilitation therapists working in primary care and at nursing homes in the Netherlands is used. The primary outcome is barriers, defined as statements with ⩾20% negative response. The survey contained 56 statements on palliative reasoning, communication, and multiprofessional collaboration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 249 healthcare professionals completed the survey (66% completion rate). The main barriers identified in the provision of palliative care were the use of measurement tools (43%), consultation of an expert (31%), estimation of life expectancy (29%), and documentation in the electronic health record (21% and 37%). In primary care, mainly organizational barriers were identified, whereas in nursing homes, most barriers were related to care content. Chaplains and rehabilitation therapists perceived the most barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In primary care and nursing homes, there are barriers to the provision of palliative care. The provision of palliative care depends on the identification of patients with palliative care needs and is influenced by individual healthcare professionals, possibilities for consultation, and the electronic health record. An unambiguous and systematic approach within the multiprofessional team is needed, which should be patient-driven and tailored to the setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231216994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231216994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景基层医疗机构和疗养院中的姑息关怀正变得越来越重要。由多专业团队提供的多维姑息关怀方法对于满足患者和亲属的价值观、愿望和需求至关重要。在这种情况下,阻碍提供姑息关怀的因素尚未得到充分探讨:确定医护人员认为在家中或疗养院为患者提供姑息关怀的障碍:设计:横断面调查研究:方法:对荷兰基层医疗机构和疗养院的护士、医生、牧师和康复治疗师进行抽样调查。主要结果是障碍,其定义为20%否定回答的陈述。调查包含 56 项陈述,涉及姑息推理、沟通和多专业合作。数据采用描述性统计进行分析:共有 249 名医护人员完成了调查(完成率为 66%)。在提供姑息关怀方面发现的主要障碍是测量工具的使用(43%)、专家咨询(31%)、预期寿命估计(29%)和电子病历中的文档记录(21% 和 37%)。在初级保健中,主要发现了组织方面的障碍,而在疗养院中,大多数障碍与护理内容有关。牧师和康复治疗师感知到的障碍最多:结论:在基层医疗机构和疗养院,姑息关怀的提供存在障碍。姑息关怀的提供取决于对有姑息关怀需求的病人的识别,并受到医护人员个人、咨询可能性和电子健康记录的影响。需要在多专业团队中采用一种明确而系统的方法,这种方法应以患者为导向,并根据具体情况量身定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers in providing palliative care in primary care and nursing homes: a survey study.

Background: Palliative care in primary care and nursing home settings is becoming increasingly important. A multidimensional palliative care approach, provided by a multiprofessional team, is essential to meeting patients' and relatives' values, wishes, and needs. Factors that hamper the provision of palliative care in this context have not yet been fully explored.

Objectives: To identify the barriers to providing palliative care for patients at home or in nursing homes as perceived by healthcare professionals.

Design: Cross-sectional survey study.

Methods: A convenience sample of nurses, doctors, chaplains, and rehabilitation therapists working in primary care and at nursing homes in the Netherlands is used. The primary outcome is barriers, defined as statements with ⩾20% negative response. The survey contained 56 statements on palliative reasoning, communication, and multiprofessional collaboration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: In total, 249 healthcare professionals completed the survey (66% completion rate). The main barriers identified in the provision of palliative care were the use of measurement tools (43%), consultation of an expert (31%), estimation of life expectancy (29%), and documentation in the electronic health record (21% and 37%). In primary care, mainly organizational barriers were identified, whereas in nursing homes, most barriers were related to care content. Chaplains and rehabilitation therapists perceived the most barriers.

Conclusion: In primary care and nursing homes, there are barriers to the provision of palliative care. The provision of palliative care depends on the identification of patients with palliative care needs and is influenced by individual healthcare professionals, possibilities for consultation, and the electronic health record. An unambiguous and systematic approach within the multiprofessional team is needed, which should be patient-driven and tailored to the setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical influence: what does success look like? Palliative care consultation in the last week of life and associated factors: a cross-sectional general population study. Using relational ethics to approach equity in palliative care. Fostering timely integrated palliative care in nursing homes through critical companionship: experiences from a Padi-Palli interventional study in France. Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1