自动化动态放射肿瘤处方检查系统:放射处方检查系统。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.002
I.M. Pashtan MD , T. Kosak MEd , K.-Y. Shin MS , C. Molodowitch BS , J.H. Killoran PhD , C. Hancox PhD , M. Czerminska MS , J.S. Bredfeldt PhD , D.W. Cail MS , M. Kearney MS , R.B. Tishler MD, PhD , R.H. Mak MD
{"title":"自动化动态放射肿瘤处方检查系统:放射处方检查系统。","authors":"I.M. Pashtan MD ,&nbsp;T. Kosak MEd ,&nbsp;K.-Y. Shin MS ,&nbsp;C. Molodowitch BS ,&nbsp;J.H. Killoran PhD ,&nbsp;C. Hancox PhD ,&nbsp;M. Czerminska MS ,&nbsp;J.S. Bredfeldt PhD ,&nbsp;D.W. Cail MS ,&nbsp;M. Kearney MS ,&nbsp;R.B. Tishler MD, PhD ,&nbsp;R.H. Mak MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite serving as a critical communication tool, radiation oncology prescriptions are entered manually and prone to error. An automated prescription checking system was developed and implemented to help address this problem.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Rules defining clinically appropriate prescriptions were generated, examining specific types of errors: (1) unapproved dose per fraction for a given disease site; (2) dose per fraction too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique; and (3) dose per fraction too low. With a goal of catching errors as upstream as possible to minimize their propagation, a report was created and ran every 30 minutes to check all newly written or approved prescriptions against the 3 rules. When a prescription violated these rules, an automated email was immediately sent to the prescriber alerting them of the potential error. System performance was continuously monitored and the criteria triggering an alert adjusted to balance error detection against false positives. Alerts leading to prescription amendment were considered true errors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to November 2022, the system checked 24,047 prescriptions. A total of 241 email alerts were triggered, for an average alert rate of 1%. Of the 241 alerts, 198 (82.2%) were unapproved doses per fraction for the disease site, 14 (5.8%) were doses per fraction that were too low, and 29 (12%) were doses too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique. Thirty-one percent of alerts led to a change of prescription, suggesting they were true errors. The baseline rate of erroneous prescription entry was 0.3%. A regression model showed that trainee prescription entry and dose per fraction &lt;150 cGy were significantly associated with true errors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the significant consequences of erroneous prescription entry, which ranged from wasted resources and treatment delays to potentially serious misadministration, there is significant value in implementing automated prescription checking systems in radiation oncology clinics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated, Dynamic Radiation Oncology Prescription Checking System\",\"authors\":\"I.M. Pashtan MD ,&nbsp;T. Kosak MEd ,&nbsp;K.-Y. Shin MS ,&nbsp;C. Molodowitch BS ,&nbsp;J.H. Killoran PhD ,&nbsp;C. Hancox PhD ,&nbsp;M. Czerminska MS ,&nbsp;J.S. Bredfeldt PhD ,&nbsp;D.W. Cail MS ,&nbsp;M. Kearney MS ,&nbsp;R.B. Tishler MD, PhD ,&nbsp;R.H. Mak MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite serving as a critical communication tool, radiation oncology prescriptions are entered manually and prone to error. An automated prescription checking system was developed and implemented to help address this problem.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Rules defining clinically appropriate prescriptions were generated, examining specific types of errors: (1) unapproved dose per fraction for a given disease site; (2) dose per fraction too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique; and (3) dose per fraction too low. With a goal of catching errors as upstream as possible to minimize their propagation, a report was created and ran every 30 minutes to check all newly written or approved prescriptions against the 3 rules. When a prescription violated these rules, an automated email was immediately sent to the prescriber alerting them of the potential error. System performance was continuously monitored and the criteria triggering an alert adjusted to balance error detection against false positives. Alerts leading to prescription amendment were considered true errors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to November 2022, the system checked 24,047 prescriptions. A total of 241 email alerts were triggered, for an average alert rate of 1%. Of the 241 alerts, 198 (82.2%) were unapproved doses per fraction for the disease site, 14 (5.8%) were doses per fraction that were too low, and 29 (12%) were doses too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique. Thirty-one percent of alerts led to a change of prescription, suggesting they were true errors. The baseline rate of erroneous prescription entry was 0.3%. A regression model showed that trainee prescription entry and dose per fraction &lt;150 cGy were significantly associated with true errors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given the significant consequences of erroneous prescription entry, which ranged from wasted resources and treatment delays to potentially serious misadministration, there is significant value in implementing automated prescription checking systems in radiation oncology clinics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850023003454\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850023003454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管放射肿瘤学处方是一种重要的交流工具,但仍需手动输入,且容易出错。为帮助解决这一问题,我们开发并实施了一套自动处方检查系统:方法:生成定义临床适当处方的规则,检查特定类型的错误:1)针对特定疾病部位的每分剂量未经批准;2)非立体定向治疗技术的每分剂量过大;3)每分剂量过低。为了尽可能在第一时间发现错误以减少其传播,我们创建了一份报告,每 30 分钟运行一次,根据上述 3 条规则检查所有新开具或批准的处方。当处方违反这些规则时,系统会立即向处方开具人自动发送一封电子邮件,提醒他们注意潜在的错误。对系统性能进行持续监控,并调整触发警报的标准,以平衡错误检测与误报之间的关系。导致处方修改的警报被视为真正的错误:从 2021 年 6 月到 2022 年 11 月,系统共检查了 24,047 份处方。共触发 241 次电子邮件警报,平均警报率为 1%。在这 241 次警报中,198 次(82.2%)是未经批准的疾病部位每分剂量,14 次(5.8%)是每分剂量过低,29 次(12%)是非立体定向治疗技术剂量过大。31%的警报导致了处方的更改,这表明它们是真正的错误。错误处方输入的基线率为 0.3%。回归模型显示,受训人员的处方输入与每分剂量有关:鉴于错误处方输入会造成严重后果,从浪费资源、延误治疗到潜在的严重用药错误,在放射肿瘤诊所实施自动处方检查系统具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Automated, Dynamic Radiation Oncology Prescription Checking System

Purpose

Despite serving as a critical communication tool, radiation oncology prescriptions are entered manually and prone to error. An automated prescription checking system was developed and implemented to help address this problem.

Methods and Materials

Rules defining clinically appropriate prescriptions were generated, examining specific types of errors: (1) unapproved dose per fraction for a given disease site; (2) dose per fraction too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique; and (3) dose per fraction too low. With a goal of catching errors as upstream as possible to minimize their propagation, a report was created and ran every 30 minutes to check all newly written or approved prescriptions against the 3 rules. When a prescription violated these rules, an automated email was immediately sent to the prescriber alerting them of the potential error. System performance was continuously monitored and the criteria triggering an alert adjusted to balance error detection against false positives. Alerts leading to prescription amendment were considered true errors.

Results

From June 2021 to November 2022, the system checked 24,047 prescriptions. A total of 241 email alerts were triggered, for an average alert rate of 1%. Of the 241 alerts, 198 (82.2%) were unapproved doses per fraction for the disease site, 14 (5.8%) were doses per fraction that were too low, and 29 (12%) were doses too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique. Thirty-one percent of alerts led to a change of prescription, suggesting they were true errors. The baseline rate of erroneous prescription entry was 0.3%. A regression model showed that trainee prescription entry and dose per fraction <150 cGy were significantly associated with true errors.

Conclusions

Given the significant consequences of erroneous prescription entry, which ranged from wasted resources and treatment delays to potentially serious misadministration, there is significant value in implementing automated prescription checking systems in radiation oncology clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Centralized Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study Number 2005: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Lung Cancer Surgery or Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Operable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (VALOR). Comprehensive Clinical Usability-oriented Contour Quality Evaluation for Deep learning Auto-segmentation: Combining Multiple Quantitative Metrics through Machine Learning. Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Guide to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Challenging Cases of Spinal Metastases. Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1