各种社会工作环境要素与混血工人幸福感之间的关系

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Facilities Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1108/f-03-2023-0019
Peter Lindeberg, Minna Saunila, Pia Lappalainen, Juhani Ukko, Hannu Rantanen
{"title":"各种社会工作环境要素与混血工人幸福感之间的关系","authors":"Peter Lindeberg, Minna Saunila, Pia Lappalainen, Juhani Ukko, Hannu Rantanen","doi":"10.1108/f-03-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Work environments are undergoing a transition and COVID-19 accelerated this change. Prior studies have associated various physical, digital and social work environment elements with occupational well-being. However, holistic approaches to the social work environment to compare the effects of the different elements have received less attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of various social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being. The findings help organizations design their work environments and cultures for the post-COVID era.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study builds on a quantitative survey with 1,057 respondents. The respondents were randomly selected, the answers were anonymous and the results were based on regression analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis indicated that working methods and practices, leadership and management practices, organizational communality and social interaction associate with hybrid worker well-being. Organizational values, reward systems and organizational structures yield no association with hybrid worker well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The value of this paper is in that it investigates elements of the social work environment, presents a research model that examines the relationship of social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being and provides new empirical data on their implications in a comparative manner.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between various social work environment elements and hybrid worker well-being\",\"authors\":\"Peter Lindeberg, Minna Saunila, Pia Lappalainen, Juhani Ukko, Hannu Rantanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/f-03-2023-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Work environments are undergoing a transition and COVID-19 accelerated this change. Prior studies have associated various physical, digital and social work environment elements with occupational well-being. However, holistic approaches to the social work environment to compare the effects of the different elements have received less attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of various social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being. The findings help organizations design their work environments and cultures for the post-COVID era.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The study builds on a quantitative survey with 1,057 respondents. The respondents were randomly selected, the answers were anonymous and the results were based on regression analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The analysis indicated that working methods and practices, leadership and management practices, organizational communality and social interaction associate with hybrid worker well-being. Organizational values, reward systems and organizational structures yield no association with hybrid worker well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The value of this paper is in that it investigates elements of the social work environment, presents a research model that examines the relationship of social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being and provides new empirical data on their implications in a comparative manner.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facilities\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-03-2023-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-03-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的工作环境正在经历转型,而 COVID-19 则加速了这一变化。先前的研究已将各种物理、数字和社会工作环境因素与职业幸福感联系起来。然而,对社会工作环境采取整体方法来比较不同要素的影响却较少受到关注。本研究的目的是探讨各种社会工作环境要素与混合型员工幸福感之间的关系。研究结果有助于各组织为后 COVID 时代设计其工作环境和文化。结果分析表明,工作方法和实践、领导和管理实践、组织社区性和社会互动与混合型工人的幸福感有关。原创性/价值本文的价值在于它调查了社会工作环境的要素,提出了一个研究模型来研究社会工作环境要素与混血工人幸福感之间的关系,并以比较的方式提供了关于其影响的新的经验数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between various social work environment elements and hybrid worker well-being

Purpose

Work environments are undergoing a transition and COVID-19 accelerated this change. Prior studies have associated various physical, digital and social work environment elements with occupational well-being. However, holistic approaches to the social work environment to compare the effects of the different elements have received less attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of various social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being. The findings help organizations design their work environments and cultures for the post-COVID era.

Design/methodology/approach

The study builds on a quantitative survey with 1,057 respondents. The respondents were randomly selected, the answers were anonymous and the results were based on regression analysis.

Findings

The analysis indicated that working methods and practices, leadership and management practices, organizational communality and social interaction associate with hybrid worker well-being. Organizational values, reward systems and organizational structures yield no association with hybrid worker well-being.

Originality/value

The value of this paper is in that it investigates elements of the social work environment, presents a research model that examines the relationship of social work environment elements with hybrid worker well-being and provides new empirical data on their implications in a comparative manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
期刊最新文献
Facility network design by using k-mean and elbow method: a case of Indian handloom industry Investigating the role of path architecture complexity in users’ movement patterns in hospital circulation systems: case studies in Golestan, Iran Students with disabilities (SWDs) and facilities accessibility in a northern Nigerian public university: dismantling exclusion in achieving SDG4 Students’ support facilities and academic adjustment among first-year undergraduates: evidence from a Nigerian public university Barriers to the adoption of energy management systems in residential buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1