医学生健康、自我效能感和 "后 COVID "期间学习成绩之间的关系。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1152/advan.00190.2023
Jonathan Ruiz, Phillip Kaminnik, Jonathan Kibble, Christine Kauffman
{"title":"医学生健康、自我效能感和 \"后 COVID \"期间学习成绩之间的关系。","authors":"Jonathan Ruiz, Phillip Kaminnik, Jonathan Kibble, Christine Kauffman","doi":"10.1152/advan.00190.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was a part of a longitudinal study investigating the relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and performance. Eighty-two eligible students were asked to complete online surveys during their second (M2) and third (M3) years. Performance outcomes included scores on various summative assessments during the M.D. program. Wellness survey results indicated that the sample of 38 M2 and 28 M3 students were overall well and self-efficacious, and they broadly maintained similar wellness characteristics across their medical education despite COVID-19 disruptions. Twenty-three students completed both surveys, and a paired analysis for this subgroup showed modest increases in stress and burnout in the M3 year. Notable correlations were observed between self-efficacy for academic work and a whole range of wellness variables for M2 students. M2 academic performance was modestly correlated to self-efficacy (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>n</i> = 38) and student burnout (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = -0.34, <i>P</i> = 0.04, <i>n</i> = 38). In contrast, for the M3 students there was little correlation between wellness, clinical self-efficacy, and clinical performance, with the only significant relationships observed to be between overall clinical self-efficacy and the strength of social networks (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.41, <i>P</i> = 0.03, <i>n</i> = 28) and between scores for postencounter notes during Objective Structure Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-efficacy in evidence-based medicine (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>n</i> = 28). In conclusion, <i>1</i>) students remained generally well throughout the post-COVID period, and <i>2</i>) self-efficacy for academic work is a good predictor of student wellness and performance during the preclerkship period but not during clinical training.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study followed a group of medical students through the \"post-COVID\" period to assess their wellness as they transitioned from basic sciences to clinical training. We found that their wellness and belief in their ability to succeed (self-efficacy) remained strong, showing their resiliency. We observed correlations between self-efficacy and their level of wellness and academic performance during basic science classes but not during clinical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and academic performance during the \\\"post-COVID\\\" period.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Ruiz, Phillip Kaminnik, Jonathan Kibble, Christine Kauffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00190.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was a part of a longitudinal study investigating the relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and performance. Eighty-two eligible students were asked to complete online surveys during their second (M2) and third (M3) years. Performance outcomes included scores on various summative assessments during the M.D. program. Wellness survey results indicated that the sample of 38 M2 and 28 M3 students were overall well and self-efficacious, and they broadly maintained similar wellness characteristics across their medical education despite COVID-19 disruptions. Twenty-three students completed both surveys, and a paired analysis for this subgroup showed modest increases in stress and burnout in the M3 year. Notable correlations were observed between self-efficacy for academic work and a whole range of wellness variables for M2 students. M2 academic performance was modestly correlated to self-efficacy (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>n</i> = 38) and student burnout (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = -0.34, <i>P</i> = 0.04, <i>n</i> = 38). In contrast, for the M3 students there was little correlation between wellness, clinical self-efficacy, and clinical performance, with the only significant relationships observed to be between overall clinical self-efficacy and the strength of social networks (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.41, <i>P</i> = 0.03, <i>n</i> = 28) and between scores for postencounter notes during Objective Structure Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-efficacy in evidence-based medicine (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.44, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>n</i> = 28). In conclusion, <i>1</i>) students remained generally well throughout the post-COVID period, and <i>2</i>) self-efficacy for academic work is a good predictor of student wellness and performance during the preclerkship period but not during clinical training.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study followed a group of medical students through the \\\"post-COVID\\\" period to assess their wellness as they transitioned from basic sciences to clinical training. We found that their wellness and belief in their ability to succeed (self-efficacy) remained strong, showing their resiliency. We observed correlations between self-efficacy and their level of wellness and academic performance during basic science classes but not during clinical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00190.2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00190.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是一项纵向研究的一部分,调查医学生健康、自我效能感和成绩之间的关系。82名符合条件的学生被要求在二年级和三年级期间完成在线调查。成绩结果包括医学博士课程期间各种总结性评估的分数。健康调查结果显示,38 名 M2 和 28 名 M3 学生总体健康,自我效能感良好,尽管受到 COVID-19 的干扰,但他们在整个医学教育过程中大致保持了相似的健康特征。23 名学生同时完成了这两项调查,对这一分组进行的配对分析表明,M3 学年的压力和倦怠感略有增加。在 M2 学生中,学术工作自我效能感与一系列健康变量之间存在显著的相关性。M2 的学习成绩与自我效能感(rs = 0.38,p = 0.02,n = 38)和学生倦怠(rs = -0.34,p = 0.04,n = 38)略有相关。与此相反,M3 学生的健康状况、临床自我效能感和临床表现之间几乎没有相关性,观察到的唯一显著关系是整体临床自我效能感和社交网络强度之间的关系(rs = 0.41,p = 0.03,n = 28),以及 OSCE 考试中的会后记录得分和循证医学自我效能感之间的关系(rs = 0.44,p = 0.02,n = 28)。总之:1)学生在COVID后的整个期间总体保持良好;2)学术工作的自我效能感能很好地预测学生在实习前期间的健康状况和表现,但不能预测临床培训期间的健康状况和表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and academic performance during the "post-COVID" period.

This study was a part of a longitudinal study investigating the relationships between medical student wellness, self-efficacy, and performance. Eighty-two eligible students were asked to complete online surveys during their second (M2) and third (M3) years. Performance outcomes included scores on various summative assessments during the M.D. program. Wellness survey results indicated that the sample of 38 M2 and 28 M3 students were overall well and self-efficacious, and they broadly maintained similar wellness characteristics across their medical education despite COVID-19 disruptions. Twenty-three students completed both surveys, and a paired analysis for this subgroup showed modest increases in stress and burnout in the M3 year. Notable correlations were observed between self-efficacy for academic work and a whole range of wellness variables for M2 students. M2 academic performance was modestly correlated to self-efficacy (rs = 0.38, P = 0.02, n = 38) and student burnout (rs = -0.34, P = 0.04, n = 38). In contrast, for the M3 students there was little correlation between wellness, clinical self-efficacy, and clinical performance, with the only significant relationships observed to be between overall clinical self-efficacy and the strength of social networks (rs = 0.41, P = 0.03, n = 28) and between scores for postencounter notes during Objective Structure Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-efficacy in evidence-based medicine (rs = 0.44, P = 0.02, n = 28). In conclusion, 1) students remained generally well throughout the post-COVID period, and 2) self-efficacy for academic work is a good predictor of student wellness and performance during the preclerkship period but not during clinical training.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study followed a group of medical students through the "post-COVID" period to assess their wellness as they transitioned from basic sciences to clinical training. We found that their wellness and belief in their ability to succeed (self-efficacy) remained strong, showing their resiliency. We observed correlations between self-efficacy and their level of wellness and academic performance during basic science classes but not during clinical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
期刊最新文献
Assembling a physical model helps students grasp human somatosensory pathways. 11th Annual Michigan Physiological Society Meeting: June 24-25, 2024. Upskilling the cell therapy manufacturing workforce: design, implementation, and evaluation of a massive open online course. Carbohydrate storage in cells: a laboratory activity for the assessment of glycogen stores in biological tissues. The conversational AI "ChatGPT" outperforms medical students on a physiology university examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1