大学语文学生对生态、社会、文化和经济可持续性的评价及其在语文教学中的重要性

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1108/ijshe-05-2023-0169
Salla-Riikka Kuusalu, Päivi Laine, Minna Maijala, Maarit Mutta, Mareen Patzelt
{"title":"大学语文学生对生态、社会、文化和经济可持续性的评价及其在语文教学中的重要性","authors":"Salla-Riikka Kuusalu, Päivi Laine, Minna Maijala, Maarit Mutta, Mareen Patzelt","doi":"10.1108/ijshe-05-2023-0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to explore how university language students evaluate different sustainability themes and examine the overall relevance of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability dimensions in language education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A questionnaire was designed to study Finnish university language students’ (<em>n</em> = 55) order of priority for sustainability dimensions and their sub-themes and the justifications for the priority orders using a mixed methods design. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using NVivo software, and weighted rankings were used to analyse the quantitative data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings of the study showed that language students evaluated the social and cultural dimensions as the most relevant in language teaching. In all dimensions, students approached sustainability mainly by prioritising larger issues and advancing towards smaller ones. Most non-directional responses appeared in the economic dimension. In addition, individual prioritising and justification approaches varied between different sustainability dimensions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have examined language students’ evaluations of and justifications for all four sustainability dimensions. The results highlight the need to use multiple, holistic approaches and systems thinking to incorporate education for sustainable development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University language students’ evaluations of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability and their importance in language teaching\",\"authors\":\"Salla-Riikka Kuusalu, Päivi Laine, Minna Maijala, Maarit Mutta, Mareen Patzelt\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijshe-05-2023-0169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to explore how university language students evaluate different sustainability themes and examine the overall relevance of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability dimensions in language education.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A questionnaire was designed to study Finnish university language students’ (<em>n</em> = 55) order of priority for sustainability dimensions and their sub-themes and the justifications for the priority orders using a mixed methods design. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using NVivo software, and weighted rankings were used to analyse the quantitative data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings of the study showed that language students evaluated the social and cultural dimensions as the most relevant in language teaching. In all dimensions, students approached sustainability mainly by prioritising larger issues and advancing towards smaller ones. Most non-directional responses appeared in the economic dimension. In addition, individual prioritising and justification approaches varied between different sustainability dimensions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have examined language students’ evaluations of and justifications for all four sustainability dimensions. The results highlight the need to use multiple, holistic approaches and systems thinking to incorporate education for sustainable development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2023-0169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2023-0169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨大学语言专业学生如何评价不同的可持续发展主题,以及生态、社会、文化和经济可持续发展维度在语言教育中的总体相关性。设计/方法/途径采用混合方法设计了一份调查问卷,以研究芬兰大学语言专业学生(n = 55)对可持续发展维度及其子主题的优先顺序,以及优先顺序的理由。研究结果表明,语言专业学生认为社会和文化维度与语言教学最为相关。在所有维度中,学生主要通过优先考虑大问题和推进小问题的方式来处理可持续性问题。大多数非指向性回答出现在经济维度。此外,在不同的可持续性维度中,个人的优先排序和理由说明方法也不尽相同。 原创性/价值 据作者所知,以前没有任何研究考察过语言学生对所有四个可持续性维度的评价和理由说明。研究结果突出表明,有必要采用多元、整体的方法和系统思维来纳入可持续发展教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University language students’ evaluations of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability and their importance in language teaching

Purpose

This study aims to explore how university language students evaluate different sustainability themes and examine the overall relevance of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability dimensions in language education.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire was designed to study Finnish university language students’ (n = 55) order of priority for sustainability dimensions and their sub-themes and the justifications for the priority orders using a mixed methods design. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using NVivo software, and weighted rankings were used to analyse the quantitative data.

Findings

The findings of the study showed that language students evaluated the social and cultural dimensions as the most relevant in language teaching. In all dimensions, students approached sustainability mainly by prioritising larger issues and advancing towards smaller ones. Most non-directional responses appeared in the economic dimension. In addition, individual prioritising and justification approaches varied between different sustainability dimensions.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have examined language students’ evaluations of and justifications for all four sustainability dimensions. The results highlight the need to use multiple, holistic approaches and systems thinking to incorporate education for sustainable development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The aim of International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education is to provide up-to-date information on new developments and trends on sustainability in a higher education context, and to catalyse networking and information exchange on sustainable development as a whole, and on the SDGs in particular, on a global basis. Authors are invited to submit papers from the following areas: Environmental management systems, Sustainable development, Sustainable Development Goals, Curricular innovation, Campus greening, Operational aspects of universities, Energy, water, recycling, waste management, Planning and design of campuses, Environmental reports, Environmental policies and action plans, Staff and student initiatives. Other themes associated to the above or emerging topics will also be considered
期刊最新文献
The role of the socio-professional characteristics of university professors in the implementation of sustainability Integrating the SDGs into the agenda of an Argentine university Pro-environmental choices in Indonesia’s campus life: examining the extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) for sustainable behavior in a university setting Impact of sustainability education on senior student attitudes and behaviors: evidence from India Employee green behavior in laboratories of higher education institutions: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1